Hi all,
I'm having trouble trying to execute fifo commands with "kamctl fifo
". Just after restarting Kamailio it works fine, however, sometimes
after some days running it doesn't respond.
kamailio1:~#* kamctl fifo which*
It doesn't respond so I input *Crtl+c* and I get:
/usr/local/lib/kamailio/
So
failure_route[FAIL_ONE] {
...
if (t_check_status("408")) {
t_reply("480","Temporarily Unavailable");
exit;
}
}
Thank you, but I am encountering particular problem, that there are 2
messages stored in the radius, the original 408 and my 480 Temporarily
unavailabe. Can I force to d
Hello,
do you get anything in kamailio log messages when the fifo is not
responding?
What version of kamailio do you have?
Removing and creating a new one will not help, since kamailio will not
reopen, so practically will still use the old file descriptor.
Cheers,
Daniel
On 1/18/11 10:54
Do you have failed transaction accounting enabled?
Can you watch the sip traffic (ngrep, wireshark), is the 408 sent to
caller as well?
Cheers,
Daniel
On 1/18/11 10:54 AM, Mino Haluz wrote:
So
failure_route[FAIL_ONE] {
...
if (t_check_status("408")) {
t_reply("480","Temporarily Un
Hello,
do you have an alias to server IP address only? If yes, then all ports
will be matched locally and r-uri will be consumed as strict route.
If not, can you run with high debug mode and send the output of ack
routing here?
Cheers,
Daniel
On 1/17/11 9:39 PM, Ricardo Martinez wrote:
Hi Daniel
I tested the patch but the mtree module fails to start:
Jan 18 04:15:55 kam-test ./kamailio[4616]: DEBUG: [db.c:202]: using
db bind api for db_postgres
Jan 18 04:15:55 kam-test ./kamailio[4616]: DEBUG: [db.c:285]:
connection 0x931768 not found in pool
Jan 18 04:15:55 kam-test ./kamail
These are my modparams.
modparam("acc", "failed_transaction_flag", 1)
modparam("acc", "report_cancels", 1)
modparam("acc", "report_ack", 0)
modparam("acc", "early_media",0)
modparam("acc", "log_level", 5)
modparam("acc", "log_flag", 1)
modparam("acc", "log_m
Hi,
my reply is inline
2011/1/18 Daniel-Constantin Mierla
> Hello,
>
> do you get anything in kamailio log messages when the fifo is not
> responding?
>
No, I didn't find anything regarding the fifo command in the logs.
>
> What version of kamailio do you have?
>
kamailio-3.0.2, the last ti
Hello,
I did a new tuning, skipping reconnect in submit query if connection is
ok - the result might be broken due to other reasons and will be
reported when fetching it. If you can try again and report, would be
appreciated.
Thanks,
Daniel
On 1/18/11 11:34 AM, Javier Gallart wrote:
Hi Da
Not sure if it is documented, but iirc, failed transactions accounting
reports each stage of a failed forwarding (i.e., each final negative
reply received for a transactions is reported).
Try:
modparam("acc", "failed_transaction_flag", 4)
And in failure route before t_reply(480...) do
setfla
Hello,
do you have ctl module loaded? If yes, you can connect with sercmd and
get the pid of the fifo listener:
sercmd> ps
Then connect with gdb:
gdb /path/to/kamailio pidoffifolistener
and get the backtrace.
That should show what the fifo process is doing.
Also, you can get the pid of fi
I changed the flag, and added:
if (t_check_status("408|480")) {
setflag(4);
t_reply("480","Temporarily unavailable");
exit;
}
But with no difference ..
On Tue, Jan 18, 2011 at 12:02 PM, Daniel-Constantin Mierla
wrote:
> Not sure if it is docum
Am 18.01.2011 12:02, schrieb Daniel-Constantin Mierla:
Not sure if it is documented, but iirc, failed transactions accounting
reports each stage of a failed forwarding (i.e., each final negative
reply received for a transactions is reported).
Try:
modparam("acc", "failed_transaction_flag", 4)
- Original Message -
From: "Mikko Lehto"
To: "Pan B. Christensen"
Cc:
Sent: Friday, January 14, 2011 6:08 AM
Subject: Re: [SR-Users] Bug in LDAP module?
Hi Pan
Do you have comment on the above patch by Daniel-Constantin?
I plan to use ldap module soon and would like to hear if th
Hello,
The diagram below shows the SIP message flow in our setup when Softphone
A places a call to Softphone B.
--- - -- - ---
|Softphone A|-<->-|Proxy|-<->-|Sip Server|-<->-|Proxy|-<->-|Softphone B|
--- - --
Vikram,
1. The port is not mandatory.
2. You can force the port in the RURI explicitly by manipulating the
mutable pseudovariable $rp prior to relay,
E.g.
$rp = 5067;
--
Alex Balashov - Principal
Evariste Systems LLC
260 Peachtree Street NW
Suite 2200
Atlanta, GA 30303
Tel: +1-678-954-06
Hello,
On 1/13/11 7:38 PM, Ovidiu Sas wrote:
Hello all,
The nathelper module in modules_k was split in two:
- nathelper (dealing with signaling);
- rtpproxy (dealing with rtpproxy protocol).
I would like to move the rtpproxy module from "modules_k" into
"modules" and remove rtpproxy functi
When A places a call to B, an INVITE is proxied to the Sip Server from
A. The Sip Server now sends another INVITE to the proxy, however the
R-URI of this INVITE does not contain the port number that the INVITE is
supposed to be sent to. Hence the proxy sends the INVITE to the default
SIP port 5060
Hello,
Alex, Klaus thank you for your replies.
Usually the softphones register to the proxy or SIP server. Thus, the
proxy or SIP server knows under which IP:port (The IP:port from which
the REGISTER was received) it can contact the sofpthone.
Yes, the softphones are registered to the SIP ser
It is assumed 5060 by default.
--
Alex Balashov - Principal
Evariste Systems LLC
260 Peachtree Street NW
Suite 2200
Atlanta, GA 30303
Tel: +1-678-954-0670
Fax: +1-404-961-1892
Web: http://www.evaristesys.com/
On Jan 18, 2011, at 2:27 PM, Vikram Ragukumar
wrote:
Hello,
Alex, Klaus thank yo
Hello,
Is there anything special that needs to be done for float comparison?
For example:
if([5.5 >= 4.3])
or
if(5.5 > 4.3)
The conditional does not seem to be coming back as true like it should?
This is simply an example... the precision in the actual case is different
(longer d
Am 18.01.2011 20:27, schrieb Vikram Ragukumar:
Hello,
Alex, Klaus thank you for your replies.
Usually the softphones register to the proxy or SIP server. Thus, the
proxy or SIP server knows under which IP:port (The IP:port from which
the REGISTER was received) it can contact the sofpthone.
Am 18.01.2011 21:26, schrieb Brandon Armstead:
Hello,
Is there anything special that needs to be done for float comparison?
For example:
if([5.5 >= 4.3])
or
if(5.5 > 4.3)
The conditional does not seem to be coming back as true like it should?
I have no idea if floating poin
23 matches
Mail list logo
