[SR-Users] Interfaces guestures

2011-02-19 Thread Spinov Evgeniy
Hello, Alex. mhomed=1 exactly what is required, however, using this option is not solved my problem. Packets are passing OK, but when the call is made, for instance from 100->101, then INVITE is generated from 100 to K ( kamailio ). K is passing this INVITE to A ( Asterisk ). Asterisk is generati

[SR-Users] Interfaces guestures

2011-02-19 Thread Spinov Evgeniy
Hello, Alex. mhomed=1 exactly what is required, however, using this option is not solved my problem. Packets are passing OK, but when the call is made, for instance from 100->101, then INVITE is generated from 100 to K ( kamailio ). K is passing this INVITE to A ( Asterisk ). Asterisk is generati

Re: [SR-Users] Failure Route and Reply Routes

2011-02-19 Thread Klaus Darilion
Brandon Armstead wrote: Alex, Thank you for this information! This is now making some more sense as to the results I am seeing. Thanks again! As an addition: Reply routes can be separated in to the "default reply route" and "named reply routes": The "default reply route" is executed

[SR-Users] My new blog http://cciev.ciscovoicetech.com/

2011-02-19 Thread Arun Kumar
Hi Guys, Soon, I'll be starting a new section related to Asterisk (around 4 years of full time experience with Asterisk, Trixbox, SER, OpenSer, MediaProxy, AGI*) so let me know if you like to see some topic coming. Cheers Arun ___ SIP Express Router (SE