[SR-Users] RE:RE: ? about presence

2011-05-04 Thread hb
Dear:Bucur Marius: Thank you for your help. As you said the presence module does not work if I disable it's module. This time I used wireshark to get the packages. I found when I disable the presence module, one point send the Notify packages directly to the other, and there

Re: [SR-Users] ? about presence

2011-05-04 Thread hb
. haibo huang -- next part -- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.sip-router.org/pipermail/sr-users/attachments/20110504/3f6d4fb8/attachment.htm

[SR-Users] R: R: R: R: R: lcr module: strip and tag

2011-05-04 Thread Alida - Danilo SMALDONE
I'm sorry for boring you Juha and others, but I really can't find an explanation to this. The only difference in the Basic Scripting is based on the $tu=$ru statement in the LCR1 I attached you 2 debug files, one with the statement $tu=$ru and one without...it seems there is some hidden place

Re: [SR-Users] Calling t_on_reply in branch_route doesn't work in Kamailio 3.1 - did work in Kamailio 1.5

2011-05-04 Thread Alex Balashov
Wouldn't the same onreply_route be conserved for every branch? I can't see how any of our implementations would actually work if that weren't the case. On 05/04/2011 12:34 PM, Sebastian Damm wrote: Hi, I'm currently migrating a Kamailio 1.5 installation to Kamailio 3.1.3, and I got all

Re: [SR-Users] Calling t_on_reply in branch_route doesn't work in Kamailio 3.1 - did work in Kamailio 1.5

2011-05-04 Thread Daniel-Constantin Mierla
On 5/4/11 6:43 PM, Alex Balashov wrote: Wouldn't the same onreply_route be conserved for every branch? I can't see how any of our implementations would actually work if that weren't the case. Yes, the onreply_route will be conserved for the entire transaction and all its branches -- the