good morning
When provisioning subscriebrs to Kamailio with the kamctl tool i see the
passwords are stored in clear on the database. For my use-case I would not
like to have that passwords in clear on the db.
What can I do to avoid this problem? Should I provision the users in a
different way
Hi,
In the scenario i am using, the flow is as followed:
1. Getting the INVITE from the user
2. Sending an INVITE with RURI changes to the NP server (sip NP server)
3. Getting a 301 reply (using the reply for the NP code)
4. Sending the call to the destination.
My problem is that the NP
Hi,
when you are adding the new Contact-Header in Failure-Route (after you
received the 3xx reply), you are working on the original message
again. So the old Contact is still removed and the new Contact is
added (as for the initial request).
There are two options for you:
1) Move your
Thanks.
I read option 2 and i agree on 1 :-)
Didnt use any branch stuff yet :-(... it seems very logical to do so when
i send the call to the NP server.
Will hit the docs...
Hi,
when you are adding the new Contact-Header in Failure-Route (after you
received the 3xx reply), you are working on
On Tue, Mar 27, 2012 at 3:13 PM, Uri Shacked uri.shac...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
Following the advice I got on the subject “remove_hf and append_hf one
after the other , twice, issue”, I tried to work with the “append_branch()”
function.
What I need to do is, after I received the invite
Hi,
try the following:
route {
# Whatever you do in your main-route
t_on_branch(modify_contact);
# Whatever you do in your main-route, the branch route is
automatically triggered for each branch.
t_relay();
}
branch_route[modify_contact] {
remove_hf(Contact);
append_hf(Contact:
In my case i need to change the header and then send it.
Here the case works if i make the changes after i sent the invite and got
the reply. As i know the t_on_branch will work after the invite is sent...
am i wrong?
There are many questions to ask about the branches... when do they work in
a
Hi Uri,
you're wrong.
t_on_branch works before the request is sent out
The branches work in the manner, you program them in your logic (e.g.
set the timeout for a request, then use failure route for serial
branches). There is no general switch (and i'm not aware of any good
docs regarding
Are you searching for examples of serial / parallel forking config found in
the TM module documentation ?
Reda
On Tue, Mar 27, 2012 at 16:55, Carsten Bock cars...@ng-voice.com wrote:
Hi Uri,
you're wrong.
t_on_branch works before the request is sent out
The branches work in the
Another one bites the dust ;).
My problem was strict vs loose routing done by loose_route function.
In order to loop through B2BUA I have defined the loopback interface's
IP as a local alias for simplicity in checking myself in routing
script.
When doing loose_route, the route address was for
Hi,
On 03/27/2012 04:46 PM, Uri Shacked wrote:
In my case i need to change the header and then send it.
Here the case works if i make the changes after i sent the invite and
got the reply. As i know the t_on_branch will work after the invite is
sent... am i wrong?
There are many
Hi,
I'm getting the following error when attempting to load pv.so
kamailio: ERROR: core [sr_module.c:572]: ERROR: load_module: could not open
module /usr/local/lib64/kamailio/modules_k/pv.so:
/usr/local/lib64/kamailio/modules_k/pv.so: undefined symbol: msg_ctx_id_set
I'm running Kamailio
Hello,
are you sure you are running 3.2.x? That version does not have
msg_ctx_id_set() at all yet. Can you send the output of 'kamailio -V'?
Cheers,
Daniel
On 3/27/12 8:51 PM, Simpson Chua wrote:
Hi,
I'm getting the following error when attempting to load pv.so
kamailio: ERROR: core
Hello,
On 3/27/12 9:33 PM, Simpson Chua wrote:
Hi,
[..]
# /usr/local/kamailio/sbin/kamailio -V
version: kamailio 3.3.0-dev6 (x86_64/linux) 6853a8
for devel version be sure you run latest version from master branch. I
just started with default config and runs fine, no missing symbol.
There is no problem as such.
On Sat, Mar 24, 2012 at 5:20 AM, Daniel-Constantin Mierla mico...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hello,
On 3/23/12 3:15 PM, Jijo wrote:
Hello,
Yes it is sending CRLF after the second CRLF from client.
Another thing is, Kamailio would send CRLF even if the second CRLF
HI
I am trying to do the early media like this:
PSTN/GW1 - Kamailio - Asterisk
-- PSTN/GW2
GW1 send invite to Kamilio, Kamilio proxy to Asterisk,
Asterisk reply with 183 ( with to tag=A) and sdp
After the playing some medium, asterisk send 603
16 matches
Mail list logo
