On Thu, 11 Oct 2012 12:37:23 +0200 Pedro Antonio Vico Solano
wrote:
> We are developing a solution based on the SQLite module for Kamailio
> and we've found some bugs/errors regarding it. We use kamailio 3.2.4
> and SQLite 3.7.14.1. The errors are about this:
Thanks for the config examples.
To
Indeed, onreply_route, like the other tm specific routing blocks, is
property of the transaction. No tm routing block is specific per branch,
this was the behaviour from the beginning, branch index PV is supposed
to give indication about what branch is executed.
Setting/resetting a tm routing
I haven't used MSRP yet - but the error messages indicates that the
client closed/reset the TCP connection. You could use tcpdump/wireshark
to verify what really happens on the TCP connection (maybe a firewall or
NAT device resets the TCP connection)
regards
Klaus
On 11.10.2012 17:35, Ed Brad
Hello Everyone,
Has anyone had any luck getting RLS working with presence.
I am seeing the following errors in my log file:
ct 10 17:20:22 RCS-Presence /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[2017]: DEBUG:
presence [hash.c:342]: record not found in hash table
Oct 10 17:20:22 RCS-Presence /usr/local/sbin/kam
I am testing connecting an MSRP client to my Kamailio instance, and I keep
getting the following error in my syslog:
/usr/sbin/kamailio[20055]: ERROR: [tcp_read.c:293]: error reading:
Connection reset by peer (104)
I believe this must be a misconfiguration on my part, I just don't know
where to
Seems like the reply route is a property of the transaction, and not of
each respective branch. I wouldn't call it "bug" at the moment, but
would call it a "limitation".
I second Juha's command - as soon as a branch is canceled I do not care
about any following responses and it may be useful t
I think $T_branch_idx is only available on branch_route, and besides, it
contains the current branch ID being processed so it wouldn't be useful
from replies outside the current branch.
Regards.
Carlos.
On Thu, Oct 11, 2012 at 11:48 AM, Alex Hermann wrote:
> On Thursday 11 October 2012, Carlos
On Thursday 11 October 2012, Carlos Ruiz Díaz wrote:
> I can confirm this behavior.
>
> I had a similar scenario when 2 or more branches were setup. First branch
> timed out, while second branch was being processed a reply from first
> branch arrived and handled improperly by a routing logic which
Stephen, see "transformations" for a full feature list:
http://www.kamailio.org/wiki/cookbooks/devel/transformations#uri_transformations
On 09.10.2012 19:31, Daniel-Constantin Mierla wrote:
On 10/9/12 5:45 PM, Stephen Dodge (Bistech) wrote:
Thanks Klaus, I did look through the cookbook but I
Hi ,
i need to register the time when arrive the following messages: invite,
alerting, progress , connected and hangup.
How can I make it ? it's is possible to store these value in the extra field
in the acc module ?
Thanks
___
SIP Express R
I can confirm this behavior.
I had a similar scenario when 2 or more branches were setup. First branch
timed out, while second branch was being processed a reply from first
branch arrived and handled improperly by a routing logic which was
configured for the second branch.
I isolated each respons
On Thursday 11 October 2012, Juha Heinanen wrote:
> Alex Hermann writes:
> > 1) set onreply_route to A
> > 2) relay 1st branch
> > 3) 1st branch times out, internal 408 is created
> > 4) tm send CANCEL to 1st branch
> >
> > 5) in failure route, onreply_route is set to B
> > 6) relay 2nd branch
> >
Well any gateway software that does protocol conversion is going to be more
overhead than pure sip.
Something has to do the protocol conversion.
Typically if you want to avoid using asterisk etc. The you can just buy a
true media gateway like audio codes which does exclusively that. Usually
the h
Hello Sir,
With due respect, the only answer for your question I have is that, I
think that the capacity handling of currently popular media servers is less
than that of Kamailio.
I agree that all of current media servers are getting better and stronger
but why should Kamailio get bottlenecked b
Alex Hermann writes:
> 1) set onreply_route to A
> 2) relay 1st branch
> 3) 1st branch times out, internal 408 is created
> 4) tm send CANCEL to 1st branch
>
> 5) in failure route, onreply_route is set to B
> 6) relay 2nd branch
> 7) 1st branch responds with 487, and goes into reply_route B inst
11 okt 2012 kl. 13:57 skrev SamyGo :
> :) "Soon..." But Not Today.
>
> Not everyone can afford the Gateways. Thanks for the replies. I was hoping
> maybe someone else be thinking of freeing the kamailio from Asterisks or
> Freeswitchs when it comes to interconnecting with PSTN.
>
Why? We ha
Hello,
i noticed thet in serial forking, replies to earlier branches arriving after
sending out a new branch use the onreply_route of the later branch instead of
the onreply_route set before sending the earlier branch
How to reproduce:
1) set onreply_route to A
2) relay 1st branch
3) 1st b
On Thursday 11 October 2012, Daniel-Constantin Mierla wrote:
> On 10/11/12 12:00 PM, Alex Hermann wrote:
> > On Thursday 11 October 2012, Daniel-Constantin Mierla wrote:
> >> Do you get any other error/debug
> >> message before that can give an hint why is failing?
> >
> > Unfortunately not.
>
>
:) "Soon..." But Not Today.
Not everyone can afford the Gateways. Thanks for the replies. I was hoping
maybe someone else be thinking of freeing the kamailio from Asterisks or
Freeswitchs when it comes to interconnecting with PSTN.
Cheers
Sammy
On Oct 11, 2012 4:09 PM, "Neill Wilkinson"
wrote
You might consider:
http://sangoma.com/products/voip_gateways/netborder_software/netborder_express.html
Then put Kamailio in front of that... Simple Gateway PRI -> SIP.
Neill;o)
Aeonvista Ltd
Opening Up New Ideas
On 11 October 2012 11:43, SamyGo wrote:
> Hi David,
>
> Thanks for this us
Hi David,
Thanks for this useful information. What I don't like is that if I've
couple of Sangoma cards, each supporting 120 channels each, is using any
of this B2BUAs in between the cards and Kamialio and get a limited capacity
application in front of Kamailio. !
If there is any driver for kam
Hello everyone,
We are developing a solution based on
the SQLite module for Kamailio and we've found some bugs/errors regarding
it. We use kamailio 3.2.4 and SQLite 3.7.14.1. The errors are about this:
- Memory leaks on querys via sqlops.
Kamailio main process leaks 4kB each 3 queries (aprox.) an
Asterisk yate or free switch.
You need something as a gateway between PRI and sip. Kamailio does not
handle this conversion
On Oct 11, 2012 6:24 AM, "SamyGo" wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I've a scenario in which I've to deploy a couple Sangoma PRI cards with
> kamailio. What I wish is that I've some driv
Hello,
I've a scenario in which I've to deploy a couple Sangoma PRI cards with
kamailio. What I wish is that I've some drivers for this purpose and so I
don't ned to install FreeSWITCH or Asterisk in between the PRIs and
Kamailio.
Kindly give any feedback on what are the possibilities and options
On 10/11/12 12:00 PM, Alex Hermann wrote:
On Thursday 11 October 2012, Daniel-Constantin Mierla wrote:
is USE_IPV6 compile flag still on?
Yes, the exact same verion is used on the IPv4 and IPv6 proxy processes.
They're even on the same host.
Do you get any other error/debug
message before t
On Thursday 11 October 2012, Daniel-Constantin Mierla wrote:
> is USE_IPV6 compile flag still on?
Yes, the exact same verion is used on the IPv4 and IPv6 proxy processes.
They're even on the same host.
> Do you get any other error/debug
> message before that can give an hint why is failing?
Un
Hello,
I recommend using 3.3.x if you start a new deployment.
Is the domain resolvable by DNS? What are the sockets kamailio is
listening on?
Cheers,
Daniel
On 10/10/12 5:21 PM, Christophe ROY wrote:
Hello
I'm quite new to SIP and TOIP so I may not understand the concepts
correctly.
I'm
Hello,
is USE_IPV6 compile flag still on? Do you get any other error/debug
message before that can give an hint why is failing?
Cheers,
Daniel
On 10/11/12 10:53 AM, Alex Hermann wrote:
Hello,
I am using the dispatcher module with a database table shared among multiple
proxies. Some proxie
What are the log messages you get with your patch? Was
uac_reg_timer() executed at startup?
Cheers,
Daniel
On 10/10/12 1:58 PM, Rene Bormann
wrote:
>> You added sleep(1000), which is sleep for 1000 seconds -- th
Hello,
I am using the dispatcher module with a database table shared among multiple
proxies. Some proxies do both IPv4 and IPv6, others only do IPv4. The problem
is when i use an IPv6 address in the dispatcher table. Then the IPv4-only
proxies fail to load the table.
ERROR: dispatcher [dispat
30 matches
Mail list logo
