Re: [SR-Users] Kamailio behind NAT

2014-01-23 Thread Klaus Darilion
Am 21.01.2014 17:33, schrieb John Smith: The next test has been to comment out the rtpproxy_manage at NATMANAGE function and to put it both at route[RELAY] and onreply(route) following your post in this list from January 2013:http://lists.sip-router.org/pipermail/sr-users/2013-January/076254.h

Re: [SR-Users] SIP Update multi-homed

2014-01-23 Thread Daniel-Constantin Mierla
Hello, On 21/01/14 13:23, Keith wrote: Hi, Thanks for the replies so far, good news is I got it working by switching off mhomed (mhomed=0). However this seems to have broken my dispatcher as the SIP OPTIONS probing is being sent from the wrong interface! Any ideas how to set where dispatch

Re: [SR-Users] kamailio-4.0.2 core issue

2014-01-23 Thread Daniel-Constantin Mierla
Hello, can you give the output in gdb for: bt full Also, do you have 'listen' parameters or kamailio is listening on all interfaces? It is recommended to upgrade to latest version 4.0.x, to be sure there is not a side effect of a fixed issues. Cheers, Daniel On 17/01/14 13:50, Surendra w

Re: [SR-Users] Kamailio behind NAT

2014-01-23 Thread John Smith
Hello Klaus, I had already two sockets bound each to two independent physical interfaces. I have added the force_send_socket at each rtpproxy It is necessary to use the cwie / cwei flags in the rtpproxy_manage call? Currently audio does not flow back to the softphones, it gets lost at Kamailio

Re: [SR-Users] LCR help

2014-01-23 Thread Daniel Tryba
On Wednesday 22 January 2014 23:19:09 Juha Heinanen wrote: > prefix column cannot hold a regular expression. lcr routing is based on > longest match, which cannot be efficiently implemented using regular > expressions. If lcr is based on longest prefix, Pete could just use a little logic to impl

Re: [SR-Users] FW: Regd. t_suspend() and t_continue()

2014-01-23 Thread Jason Penton
Hi Shankar, I will setup and test case and try to reproduce as soon as I can. I suspect I will be able to get back to you early next week only Cheers Jason On Thu, Jan 23, 2014 at 8:48 AM, Shankar wrote: > Hi, > > > > From our repeated load tests what we can conclude irrespective of the > num

[SR-Users] Kamailio with extern Presence and XCAP server

2014-01-23 Thread mohammed alyaseen
Hi all, Since 2 weeks I am trying to get Kamailio presence and xcap servers working. I am testing with RCS clients (native android clients). Somehow the presence server of kamailio doesn't like some subscribe events of RCS for example "Event: xcap-diff;path="resource-lists/users/sip:22...@kamai

[SR-Users] P_usrloc - expired locations

2014-01-23 Thread Helena Garcia-Nieto
Hi All, I am testing the p_usrloc module in order to write the location information of my kamailo server (Kamailio is on version 4.0.2) in two db As first test both DB are on the same machine, as well as the master db. On final version master and one db would probably be on the same machine an

Re: [SR-Users] P_usrloc - expired locations

2014-01-23 Thread Henning Westerholt
Am Donnerstag, 23. Januar 2014, 16:59:30 schrieb Helena Garcia-Nieto: > I am testing the p_usrloc module in order to write the location information > of my kamailo server (Kamailio is on version 4.0.2) in two db > > As first test both DB are on the same machine, as well as the master db. On > fina

Re: [SR-Users] P_usrloc - expired locations

2014-01-23 Thread Helena Garcia-Nieto
Hello Henning Thanks for the advice! We probably need to do that! But... there is no module configuration or simple kamailio configuration to do it? Thanks again!! Helena -Original Message- From: Henning Westerholt [mailto:h...@kamailio.org] Sent: jueves, 23 de enero de 2014 17:05 To:

Re: [SR-Users] P_usrloc - expired locations

2014-01-23 Thread Henning Westerholt
Am Donnerstag, 23. Januar 2014, 17:13:11 schrieb Helena Garcia-Nieto: > Ok! > > Thank you very much for the advice, I'll set up some crontab job for that! Hello Helena, ok, you could implement it with the help of the timer and sqlops module as well. Just before somebody else correct me here. ;-

Re: [SR-Users] P_usrloc - expired locations

2014-01-23 Thread Henning Westerholt
Am Donnerstag, 23. Januar 2014, 17:06:12 schrieb Helena Garcia-Nieto: > Thanks for the advice! > > We probably need to do that! But... there is no module configuration or > simple kamailio configuration to do it? Hello Helena, no, there is no module configuration for that. I a big distributed se

Re: [SR-Users] P_usrloc - expired locations

2014-01-23 Thread Helena Garcia-Nieto
Ok! Thank you very much for the advice, I'll set up some crontab job for that! Helena -Original Message- From: Henning Westerholt [mailto:h...@kamailio.org] Sent: jueves, 23 de enero de 2014 17:11 To: Helena Garcia-Nieto Cc: sr-users@lists.sip-router.org Subject: Re: [SR-Users] P_usrloc

Re: [SR-Users] Kamailio behind NAT

2014-01-23 Thread Klaus Darilion
On 23.01.2014 10:29, John Smith wrote: Hello Klaus, I had already two sockets bound each to two independent physical interfaces. I have added the force_send_socket at each rtpproxy Just for clarity: force_send_socket is for near_end NAT traversal of the SIP signaling, whereas manage_rtppr

Re: [SR-Users] Replicate registration

2014-01-23 Thread Volkan Oransoy
First of all thank you for your replies. I think I am quite close to solution. But still have NAT issues in some cases. I have added a bunch of code to the standard kamailio script. I defined a new flag #!define SOCK_FLAG 8 added these parameters to registrar module. modparam("registrar", "sock

Re: [SR-Users] LCR help

2014-01-23 Thread Pete Ashdown
On 01/22/2014 03:19 PM, Juha Heinanen wrote: > Pete Ashdown writes: > >> 2) How do I populate the rest of the LCR database? It appears that >> using "kamctl lcr" has been depreciated. Am I supposed to use Siremis? >> Is there any way to do this via shell? Does anyone have any scripts >> that di

Re: [SR-Users] Replicate registration

2014-01-23 Thread Charles Chance
Hi Volkan, You probably should take a look at the Path module. For UACs behind NAT, the INVITEs should be proxied via the server with which the client is registered. Best regards, Charles On 23 January 2014 21:41, Volkan Oransoy wrote: > First of all thank you for your replies. > > I think