Thank Godness for your reply!!!
In RFC3261, section 10.2.4 Refreshing Bindings.
I've checked the packages of X-lite and Linphone, they act just like what
the RFC says.
the registration procedure of them like :
R+401+R(auth)+200+R(auth)+200+R(auth)+200+..
During registration, call id and from t
So far, I have a kamailio.cfg that routes INVITEs between Asterisk and the external networks. Now I want to start adding MSRP support. However, with my current configuration, the test client (Blink) sends an INVITE with a SDP payload that specifies msrps
media. This gets routed to Asterisk, and it
Hi,
I am trying to build a simple architecture like this:
UAC <--> Proxy1 <--> Proxy2 <--> UAS
(each on a different VM)
Is it possible to have this architecture built without any "registrar"
module?
I have simulated my UAC and UAS using SIPp and the routing in Proxy1 and
Proxy2 is to forward to
Hi Daniel,
In failure route, I used t_reply(). Shall I try send_reply()? What’s the
difference?
Cheers,
Allen
From: Daniel-Constantin Mierla [mailto:mico...@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, 23 June 2014 8:31 p.m.
To: Allen Zhang; Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List
Subject: Re: [SR-Users] kamailio not
Hi,
I have another update.
The problem that I had is fixed now and it is fixed in an unexpected way!
The fix seems to be in changing the SIPp default client scenario. In
specific, once I change the UAC.xml in SIPp trunk to generate the "BYE"
message's "To" field like this:
To: sut
>
inst
Just a quick question. What is supposed to be wrong with the below message?
Jun 23 12:47:16 elx /usr/sbin/kamailio[20891]: ERROR:
[parser/parse_fline.c:243]: parse_first_line(): parse_first_line: bad message
(offset: 22)
Jun 23 12:47:16 elx /usr/sbin/kamailio[20891]: ERROR: [parser/msg_parser
I want to announce that we are giving away 2 grants for students or
unemployed people willing to attend the development workshop and learn
how to extend Kamailio by writing C code. There are many companies
looking to hire persons with such knowledge, therefore it can be a good
chance for a nice
There was an alternative patch pushed -- if you change To header via
uac_replace_to(...), then the CANCEL has the new header value.
Cheers,
Daniel
On 20/06/14 19:23, Örn Arnarson wrote:
Found this on the issue:
http://lists.sip-router.org/pipermail/sr-dev/2012-October/016657.html
Seems that t
Hello,
On 20/06/14 18:30, Örn Arnarson wrote:
Hello,
I'm running Kamailio 4.0.4, and I'm running into problems when trying
to insert or update headers when the method is CANCEL. It just seems
that nothing at all happens to the message.
Is this a bug or a design choice?
the CANCEL is generated
Maybe you can give more details on what packetcable 2.0 is.
On the other hand, Kamailio is a SIP server with a proxy architecture as
foundation. SIP core is specified by IETF in RFC3261, and extended by a
rather large group of other RFCs.
Cheers,
Daniel
On 20/06/14 19:48, Horo, Priyam wrote:
On 21/06/14 13:22, nevious wrote:
Hello all!
I make kamailio1 remotely register to kamailio2.
Here I set K1 modparam("uac", "reg_timer_interval", 15), and expires
in uacreg as 30s.
Then K1 should refresh registration after 15s.
However the callid and from tag of every registration are differe
Hello,
what function are you using inside kamailio.cfg to send the 202? Iirc,
m_store() doesn't send anything internally, it is done via config. Be
sure you use send_reply() or t_reply() inside the failure route block.
Cheers,
Daniel
On 22/06/14 23:32, Allen Zhang wrote:
Hi Daniel,
R sent
12 matches
Mail list logo
