> I've read your article about Kamailio as an SBC and found uac module
> description with uac_restore_from() and uac_restore_to(). It looks
> like suitable for me, so I'll try to use it.
uac_restore_from() and uac_restore_to() works fine, but next I need to
modify ip address in SDP headers in resp
any thoughts on this?
-Veera
On Tue, Aug 26, 2014 at 6:03 AM, Veerabhara Gundu wrote:
> Hello Friends,
>
> I have a scenario, where clients are going away and re-registering with
> new IP and Port numbers. Presence server keep sending NOTIFY messages for
> both old Subscription and new Subscri
> ... basically no
I've read your article about Kamailio as an SBC and found uac module
description with uac_restore_from() and uac_restore_to(). It looks
like suitable for me, so I'll try to use it.
--
WBR,
Eugene Prokopiev
___
SIP Express Router (SE
On 08/25/14 19:25, Alex Villacís Lasso wrote:
> I have a rtpproxy configuration that spawns several rtpproxy instances,
> using bridge mode. An example is shown below:
>
> /usr/bin/rtpproxy -p /var/run/rtpproxy.pid-7723 -u rtpproxy -s
> udp:127.0.0.1 7723 192.168.2.18/127.0.0.1 -m 1 -M 2
On 08/26/14 20:58, Alex Balashov wrote:
> On 08/26/2014 08:56 PM, Paul Belanger wrote:
>
>> I'd agree 'drop-in' replacement is not correct. I ran into the same
>> issues as you. Current there is no bridge-mode in rtpengine, I point
>> you to an open issue about it [1].
>
> I think the idea behind
On 08/26/2014 08:56 PM, Paul Belanger wrote:
I'd agree 'drop-in' replacement is not correct. I ran into the same
issues as you. Current there is no bridge-mode in rtpengine, I point
you to an open issue about it [1].
I think the idea behind the formulation of "drop-in replacement" is that
the
Hi,
We have a Kamalio a configuration that forwards calls to a freeswitch server
(adding record-route). The SIP signaling becomes successful till Kamailio
receives 200 OK with session description from our carrier. After kamailio
forwards the 200 OK with session description to Freeswitch, Kamail
On Tue, Aug 26, 2014 at 2:20 PM, Alex Villacís Lasso
wrote:
> El 26/08/14 12:02, Alex Villacís Lasso escribió:
>
>> El 25/08/14 18:28, Alex Balashov escribió:
>>>
>>> On 08/25/2014 07:25 PM, Alex Villacís Lasso wrote:
>>>
However, I do not find an equivalent to bridge mode in the rtpengine
El 26/08/14 12:02, Alex Villacís Lasso escribió:
El 25/08/14 18:28, Alex Balashov escribió:
On 08/25/2014 07:25 PM, Alex Villacís Lasso wrote:
However, I do not find an equivalent to bridge mode in the rtpengine
command-line parameters.
Bridging mode of this type is not supported by rtpeng
Friends,
Any thoughts...
-VG
On Tue, Aug 26, 2014 at 6:03 AM, Veerabhara Gundu wrote:
> Hello Friends,
>
> I have a scenario, where clients are going away and re-registering with
> new IP and Port numbers. Presence server keep sending NOTIFY messages for
> both old Subscription and new Subsc
El 25/08/14 18:28, Alex Balashov escribió:
On 08/25/2014 07:25 PM, Alex Villacís Lasso wrote:
However, I do not find an equivalent to bridge mode in the rtpengine
command-line parameters.
Bridging mode of this type is not supported by rtpengine.
If this is true, then mediaproxy-ng/rtpengin
On 26/08/14 18:41, Eugene Prokopiev wrote:
Apart from topoh module (an experimental hack in my opinion)
Why experimental? It is used in production in many places.
How it can be used? Mask IP must be different than SIP server local
IP, so it looks like impossible to rewrite public IP address to
On 08/26/2014 12:45 PM, Eugene Prokopiev wrote:
I have some experience with FreeSWITCH but have no one with SEMS. Have
SEMS any advantages over FreeSWITCH for topology hiding?
More narrow and specialised use-cases, so you don't have to deal with
stripping it of PBX and miscellaneous applicati
> You are describing a b2bua, back to back user agent. Freeswitch is what I
> use. There is SEMS and of course asterisk. I don't recommend asterisk.
I have some experience with FreeSWITCH but have no one with SEMS. Have
SEMS any advantages over FreeSWITCH for topology hiding?
--
WBR,
Eugene
I really want to use top hide using dialog module but having very difficult
time..
[UA]--[Opensips]-[Asterisk]
I want to hide UA so Asterisk doesn't know its IP. I have following config,
Please correct me if anything wrong in my config, Problem is if callee
whoever connected to asterisk h
>> Apart from topoh module (an experimental hack in my opinion)
>
> Why experimental? It is used in production in many places.
How it can be used? Mask IP must be different than SIP server local
IP, so it looks like impossible to rewrite public IP address to server
local IP address :(
--
WBR,
Eu
Hello,
can you send a trace that includes the registration as well as the call?
The pub-gruu is using the AoR, iirc.
Also, the line you refer to is not matching anymore with latest 4.1.x --
paste the code around it to locate it properly.
Cheers,
Daniel
On 26/08/14 18:05, samuel wrote:
Hi a
Hi all,
I'm having some issues treating requests within dialogs with gruu enabled
with kamailio 4.1.2.
I've got the "standard" configuration of WITHIN route with the adition of
the next lines:
if(is_gruu()){
route(LOCATION);
It is not needed to see the memory operations logs. Just to dump the
chunks in memory.
You would need ctl and ctl_rpc modules (iirc -- they should be in the
default config file), then run:
kamcmd cfg.set_now_int core mem_dump_shm 1
Extract the logs of the dump from the shared memory and send
Thank you.
I have recompiled with MEMDBG, however I am not observing any additional output
in my log files.
I think I have something set incorrectly in kamailio.cfg.
Here are my log settings from Kamailio.cfg
debug=3
log_stderror=no
log_facility=LOG_LOCAL0
memdbg=2
memlog=2
...
modparam("debugg
On 26/08/14 15:54, Alex Balashov wrote:
On 26 August 2014 09:52:59 GMT-04:00, Daniel-Constantin Mierla
wrote:
On 26/08/14 15:48, Alex Balashov wrote:
Apart from topoh module (an experimental hack in my opinion)
Why experimental? It is used in production in many places.
Does it still have
On 26 August 2014 09:52:59 GMT-04:00, Daniel-Constantin Mierla
wrote:
>
>On 26/08/14 15:48, Alex Balashov wrote:
>> Apart from topoh module (an experimental hack in my opinion)
>Why experimental? It is used in production in many places.
Does it still have the bug where the IP of the bound int
On Aug 26, 2014, at 9:46 AM, Eugene Prokopiev wrote:
> Is it possible at all to do double topology hiding with Kamailio? SIP
> devices with public ip addresses must not know private softswitch
> address and softswitch must not know any public ip address. Softswitch
> must work only with Kamailio
On 26/08/14 15:48, Alex Balashov wrote:
Apart from topoh module (an experimental hack in my opinion)
Why experimental? It is used in production in many places.
Daniel
, basically no. It's a proxy. Proxies are highly transparent. Logical call leg
A in, logical call leg A out. There's no topo
On 26 Aug 2014, at 15:46, Eugene Prokopiev wrote:
> Is it possible at all to do double topology hiding with Kamailio? SIP
> devices with public ip addresses must not know private softswitch
> address and softswitch must not know any public ip address. Softswitch
> must work only with Kamailio pr
Apart from topoh module (an experimental hack in my opinion), basically no.
It's a proxy. Proxies are highly transparent. Logical call leg A in, logical
call leg A out. There's no topology to hide, really.
On 26 August 2014 09:46:29 GMT-04:00, Eugene Prokopiev wrote:
>Is it possible at all to
Is it possible at all to do double topology hiding with Kamailio? SIP
devices with public ip addresses must not know private softswitch
address and softswitch must not know any public ip address. Softswitch
must work only with Kamailio private address.
--
WBR,
Eugene Prokopiev
__
Hello Friends,
I have a scenario, where clients are going away and re-registering with new
IP and Port numbers. Presence server keep sending NOTIFY messages for both
old Subscription and new Subscription for same clients till the old
subscription expires. It's unnecessary traffic and processing o
> If you want a different ip address in VIA than the local socket of kamailio,
> then look at set_advertise_address() from core cookbook.
No, it is more important to rewrite To and From headers to source
interface ip address for proxied requests and responses. What is the
right way to do it? Where
Each hop in the path of a SIP request has to add a Via header with its
own address.
If you want a different ip address in VIA than the local socket of
kamailio, then look at set_advertise_address() from core cookbook.
Cheers,
Daniel
On 26/08/14 12:31, Eugene Prokopiev wrote:
Now I need to h
That is not an error message, but an INFO.
If kamailio is starting, then check if its listening on port 5061:
netstat -altpn | grep kamailio
Cheers,
Daniel
On 26/08/14 12:48, Debojit Kakoti wrote:
I am getting error
INFO: tls [tls_init.c:385]: init_tls_compression(): tls: init_tls:
disablin
Hello,
Now, when I try to execute the /etc/init.d/kamailio start, I have the
following message :
/etc/init.d/kamailio: line 131: log_daemon_msg: command not found
Thank you for your help,
Best Regards,
Djamel BAHAMID.
Le 18/08/2014 17:39, Djamel Bahamid a écrit :
Le 18/08/2014 16:38, Oll
I am getting error
INFO: tls [tls_init.c:385]: init_tls_compression(): tls: init_tls:
disabling compression...
--
Debojit Kakoti
Mobile : +91 9650654870
Email : debojkakot...@gmail.com
Skype: deboj1988
___
SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamaili
Now I need to hide local topology: rewrite public ip addresses in
sip/sdp headers with internal kamailio address (10.10.10.7) for
incoming requests, rewrite internal softswitch address with public
kamailio ip address (10.7.7.7) and forward rtp packets. So, I have
rtpproxy running:
$ ps aux | grep
> The above config should work, but you need to load pv module.
Thanks, this helps
--
WBR,
Eugene Prokopiev
___
SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list
sr-users@lists.sip-router.org
http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/m
Hello,
I quickly looked over the modules that use shared memory and I couldn't
spot a commit related to any leak.
Have you had the chance to compile with MEMDBG?
Cheers,
Daniel
On 19/08/14 19:14, Heenan, Timothy Steven wrote:
Do you think any of these modules possibly causing this issue?
On 26/08/14 08:55, Eugene Prokopiev wrote:
Which module/function need I use to simple forward any
request/responce to another sip server?
Is forward function enought for me -
http://www.kamailio.org/wiki/cookbooks/4.1.x/core#forward ? I tried to
use:
route {
$du = "sip:10.10.10.50:5060;trans
> route {
> $du = "sip:10.10.10.50:5060;transport=udp";
> forward();
> }
similar opensips configuration:
route {
forward("10.10.10.50:5060");
}
works as expected - opensips forwards requests and even responses back
how to do the same in kamailio?
--
WBR,
Eugene Prokopiev
__
38 matches
Mail list logo
