Hello,
On 29/10/15 13:28, Loïc Boissy wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I would like to know if kamailio is able to store contact "display
> name" in its database?
> Thank you for your help.
it is not saved in the address field because that becomes r-uri after
lookup location.
If you need to see it in the data
Hello,
the version is too old to remember its tls implementation, which was
rather rigid. For clarification, do you mean that tls_crl is not
available or if set, it doesn't work?
Cheers,
Daniel
On 29/10/15 15:08, Evgeniy Ivanov wrote:
> Hello!
>
> I use kamailio 1.5.4-tls (i386/linux).
>
> I con
I would like to set up kamailio in order to listen to multiple port.
I have set :
port=5060
port=5228
But it always listen on the port indicated on last line:
Listening on
udp: 127.0.0.1:5228
udp: x.x.x.x:5228
tcp: 127.0.0.1:5228
tcp: x.x.x
Hello!
I use kamailio 1.5.4-tls (i386/linux).
I configured the tls options:
disable_tls = 0
listen=tls:192.168.50.60:5061
tls_certificate="/etc/kamailio/tls/crt.pem"
tls_private_key="/etc/kamailio/tls/key.pem"
tls_ca_list="/etc/kamailio/tls/ca.pem"
tls_verify_client=on
tls_require_client_certifi
Hello,
I would like to know if kamailio is able to store contact "display name" in
its database?
Thank you for your help.
Best regards.
Loïc
___
SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list
sr-users@lists.sip-router.org
http:/
Hello!
Thanks to @cezar91 we finally spot the issue, basically kamailio it's
transforming t_code=0 (timeout) to 408 and the dispatcher module sees this
last value.
Oct 28 14:16:32 net21-test /usr/sbin/kamailio[31911]: DEBUG: tm
[t_reply.c:1311]: t_should_relay_response(): -> T_code=0,
new
Sorry Daniel, missed off list!
Hi Daniel,Great thanks for that response, I have been working with AVPs and Im
almost there.I will certainly check out the jansson module, is that new to 4.3
as Im currently on 4.2?In terms of AVPs, if you have an array structure in
place, I appreciate it pushes en
Same mail as last time but now in plain text.
Sorry :(
Gesendet: Mittwoch, 28. Oktober 2015 um 16:59 Uhr
Von: "Stefan Kohlhauser"
An: mico...@gmail.com, sr-users@lists.sip-router.org
Betreff: Re: [SR-Users] 100% CPU usage after NTP date update
Hello Daniel!
We have managed to track the problem
