Hello,
can you send the reply you got to the CANCEL? I am interested mainly in
the parameters of Via header.
Cheers,
Daniel
On 20/01/16 02:48, Alex Balashov wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm using topoh and am running into lots of these errors:
>
> Jan 19 20:34:52 csrpus1 /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[3641]: ERRO
> On 19 Jan 2016, at 10:57, indranil chowdhury wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> Is SIP trunking possible with the free version of Kamailio or we need to
> upgrade
> to business license?
There is only one version, the free business version :-)
>
> Kindly get back to us with the details of using SIP tru
On 01/19/2016 08:57 PM, Alex Balashov wrote:
After I applied the advice given therein, the error seems to have gone away.
Alas, false hope. The problem persists.
--
Alex Balashov | Principal | Evariste Systems LLC
303 Perimeter Center North, Suite 300
Atlanta, GA 30346
United States
Tel: +1-
I went back and looked through topoh commit history and found this:
https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/commit/78324dcc09d0a51fa02a960a40faa7fdadddce66
After I applied the advice given therein, the error seems to have gone
away. I assume this applies because CANCEL is also a locally generated
PS. Running 4.3:583dc060.
On 01/19/2016 08:48 PM, Alex Balashov wrote:
Hi,
I'm using topoh and am running into lots of these errors:
Jan 19 20:34:52 csrpus1 /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[3641]: ERROR:
[R-DEFAULT-STATELESS-REPLY:nmhfrms2ib9Cnm9kS00Qtbtot5PMiQ0Ni1QKS5iKibuotel14Ygc]
!> Received stat
Hi,
I'm using topoh and am running into lots of these errors:
Jan 19 20:34:52 csrpus1 /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[3641]: ERROR:
[R-DEFAULT-STATELESS-REPLY:nmhfrms2ib9Cnm9kS00Qtbtot5PMiQ0Ni1QKS5iKibuotel14Ygc]
!> Received stateless reply 200 (CANCEL) from xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx:5060
Jan 19 20:34:53 csrpu
Can you get a pcap for a case with the new config? Being traveling, but
maybe I get a chance to look at it soon.
Reading quickly on some docs, I noticed that subs_db_mode=3 and
notifier_proceses=0 rise a conflict:
http://www.kamailio.org/docs/modules/devel/modules/presence.html#presence.p.notifie
Hello,
the domain part of the uri matters in matching the sip addresses.
You should use a common hostname instead of IP addresses in such case,
if you want to have same presentity.
Even if you do it in kamailio somehow for many IPs, the watchers won't
consider those to which they haven't subscri
Just to follow this up with more recent results. I've simplified things and
have been testing calling from a Kamailio registered UA to a phone on the PSTN.
There's only 1 dialog in Kamailio for this and the results are just as strange.
BLF works for a while and then breaks. In this particular ca
I see the records in presentity table are expiring rather in short
interval. Is the lamp still on after that?
Cheers,
Daniel
On 19/01/16 19:10, Phil Lavin wrote:
>
> Below is the relevant presence/pua stuff. Let me know if I should be
> examining other tables.
>
>
>
> When the call ends, there
Hello.
Thanks for the quick reply.
The internal ports were different in the testing I was doing. Client A was
using 5061 as the local TCP port for the persistent TLS connection for SIP
signalling. Client B was using ephemeral high TCP ports for the brief test
connections.
The best way to reprodu
I think I asked what do you mean by "freeswitch is generated
UN-allocated number" -- is it sending a SIP reply to Kamailio?
Maybe you can paste here the sip capture with ngrep for such call.
Cheers,
Daniel
On 19/01/16 23:44, malik sherif wrote:
>
> Any idea as to how to correct this problem? Als
Hello,
I am not the developer that added the new_conn_alias_flags and had not
time to dig much in the code to given an precise answer. But if it make
the case you detailed to work, then set it. In its definition in the
code i saw it can be 0, 1 or 2.
Try to see if it works to set it in kamailio.c
Any idea as to how to correct this problem? Also wireshark trace shows that
unrecognized SIP header for invite from freeswitch to kamailio and the header
from freeswitch is X-FS-support: update _display ,send_info. How can I disable
this header? any other solution beside disabling the header?
Hi all,
A different BLF query to my other one so creating another thread.
We've tried to have a BLF client SUBSCRIBE using a secondary IP on Kamailio. It
is not sent a NOTIFY, but a client which has done a SUBSCRIBE using the primary
IP is. If we route the problematic client such that it connec
Below is the relevant presence/pua stuff. Let me know if I should be examining
other tables.
When the call ends, there are no dialogs remaining in the dialog table. A few
things do hang around in the presentity and pua tables for a short period of
time.
Regarding CLI changing, it does seem to
To get rport you can use transformations.
If you restart kamailio, is the firewall preserving the same value for
rport?
Cheers,
Daniel
On 19/01/16 18:18, Nelson Migliaro wrote:
> I am thinking that I cat get the port during the first call and then
> use that port for the rest of calls.
> Maybe t
Hello,
the runtime issue is happening inside the free cell of tm, which I
refactored for catching unnecessary refs, as I got leads could happen on
some async handling. But that code is only in master and branch 4.3.
Would you be able to test with those branches? If not, I can try to see
if the cod
Hello,
is any of these two dialogs staying not terminated when the call is ended?
I would only advertise the dialog info states for the call leg going to
callee, because it is the one for call pickup.
On the other hand for shared line appearance, the caller is watched as
well. Is the caller id c
Hello,
and in the presence/pua related tables, do you have records related to
the this calls?
Those from dialog table are only for dialog module internal needs.
Cheers,
Daniel
On 19/01/16 10:41, Phil Lavin wrote:
>
> Hi Daniel,
>
>
>
> Thanks for your response. There are 2 records in the data
I am thinking that I cat get the port during the first call and then use
that port for the rest of calls.
Maybe that first call will fail but after that, all calls will go fine.
Example of a Trying showing received port: 52548
¿Do you know what pseudovariable represent that value?
I tested with
Hello,
Is SIP trunking possible with the free version of Kamailio or we need to
upgrade
to business license?
Kindly get back to us with the details of using SIP trunking using
Kamailio. We have
a requirement in our organisation regarding the same which uses IMS and SIP
trunking.
In this setup we
Hello Daniel,
I don't think so. Looking at my config, I don't see any t_suspend and tsilo
module is not loaded.
I'm just using dialog module for snmpstats.
Regards,
Igor.
De : Daniel-Constantin Mierla [mailto:mico...@gmail.com]
Envoyé : lundi 18 janvier 2016 08:56
À : Igor Potjevl
Hi Daniel,
The multiple records are because we are routing calls between UAs which are
both registered against Kamailio via an external SIP server (our billing
engine). That is causing there to be 2 dialogs created.
We have put in a quick hack to not call dlg_manage() when the $fU is "9989".
T
Hi Evren,
1. The UAC module uses a database table called `uacreg` as a list of
credentials and registration destinations.
See:
https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/blob/master/utils/kamctl/mysql/uac-create.sql
2. You can trigger a registration manually with uac_reg_request_to()
from route s
Hi Daniel,
Thanks for your response. There are 2 records in the database. They are below:
mysql> select * from dialog\G;
*** 1. row ***
id: 602
hash_entry: 3537
hash_id: 8368
callid: 8f7b7053-2026fb79-350890bb@
Hi,
I am a newbie. As I read I understand I need to use UAC module for
registration but cannot figure how to trigger the registration request. I
enable the UAC module and it seem to be working.
How can I trigger the REGISTER to a SIP provider account?
And is it possible to use multiple accounts
Hi,
We have a media server and (opensips + rtpengine).
How can I configure opensips+rtpengine to just do DTLS handshake with the
client, but the media should not go through RTPEngine. The media should go
to the Media server.
Thanks.
Riko
___
SIP Expre
Hello,
if you are looking at sharing the same destination addresses, many
kamailio can connect to the same database.
If you have active-active LBs want to notify the other LB about a change
in a state of a destination, then you can use the event_route blocks
executed by dispatcher module to notif
29 matches
Mail list logo
