I have something similar and I use the following architecture:
NGCP-A-subscribres A||sip trunk between A and B
||NGCP-B-subscribers B
||sip trunk between B and C
|NGCP-C-Subscribers C
||sip trunk between A and C
|NGCP-A---
Hi Daniel,
I was able to prevent the bus error by reverting part of commit
1b366aa1c6c37e2320da10fb68f0370199333f5d as below:
diff --git a/cfg/cfg_struct.c b/cfg/cfg_struct.c
index 8bfe429..519c6a9 100644
--- a/cfg/cfg_struct.c
+++ b/cfg/cfg_struct.c
@@ -295,8 +295,7 @@ static void cfg_destory_gr
I need to understand where from packets received. Now I use something like
If $si == "1.2.3.4" {
xlog("L_INFO","bla bla bla");
}
But I need to check source server not only by IP and PORT, but at Domain too
For example
if (some_pseudovariable=="pbx.server.com"){
xlog("L_INFO","bla bla bla");
}
Hi Rehan,
No matter which mode you are running rtpproxy in that IP will always be the
IP of the machine it is running on.
That means that SDP will take that IP once routed to locally subnet A2B
servers.
As far as the A2B detecting SIP user as online or offline based on DB, I
am not too sure about
hi Gholamreza Sabery
you should be implement HA on your server.you can use the
pacemaker/corosync or other software for run and configuration HA on
your server.
On 1/31/16, Gholamreza Sabery wrote:
> I am trying to create a cluster of Kamailio servers. I want users that are
> registered on one s
Dear Hossein; I know about Corosync and Pacemaker and I implemented
something using these tools with Ansible (
https://github.com/ghrst/Kamailio-HA). But my question here is about
active-active scenarios not an active-passive one!
On Mon, Feb 1, 2016 at 2:14 AM, Hossein Aghaie
wrote:
> hi Ghola
Hi Gholamreza,
Most Kamailio functionality can be used in an active-active way as long
as there is a database persistence layer that can be shared among them:
In particular, since you asked about the registrar: you can use
`db_mode` 3 with `usrloc` to achieve this persistence:
http://kamail
Although, the core `dmq` module is a big help in providing a
distribution vehicle for messaging you do wish to replicate into a
'cluster':
http://kamailio.org/docs/modules/4.3.x/modules/dmq.html#dmq.f.dmq_t_replicate
--
Alex Balashov | Principal | Evariste Systems LLC
303 Perimeter Center Nort
Hi Members,
I notice an issue: the client register to kamailio server and could receive
200-register message, but no contact infomation(shows 0 bindings) returns in
the message(200-register). I checked contact exist in register message and
client shows register successfully. When I run command
Thank you so much Alex. I tried REGISTER replication and DM_MODE 3. But my
problem here is that in these scenarios Kamailio will give you a non-local
socket error. I want to have multiple Kamailio servers so that a user that
is registered on one server can easily call other users on another server.
On 02/01/2016 02:33 AM, Gholamreza Sabery wrote:
in these scenarios Kamailio will give you a non-local socket error
It's a warning, not an error. Right?
I don't remember how we solved that...
--
Alex Balashov | Principal | Evariste Systems LLC
303 Perimeter Center North, Suite 300
Atlanta, G
Here's a thought, though:
If your goal is really for users registered on one server to be able to
easily call users registered on another server, you probably don't care
to replicate or share the 'location' table per se. You just want one
Kamailio server to call the right Kamailio server to re
12 matches
Mail list logo