You are correct that it is a piece of documentation errata. It doesn't
exist.
On 04/18/2016 05:02 PM, Brooks Bridges wrote:
What is this? It’s referenced here:
http://kamailio.org/docs/modules/stable/modules/htable.html#idp1912904
but I cannot find it anywhere else.
The only 2 places I find
What is this? It's referenced here:
http://kamailio.org/docs/modules/stable/modules/htable.html#idp1912904 but I
cannot find it anywhere else.
The only 2 places I find any reference to it at all in the entire codebase is
here:
modules/htable/doc/htable_admin.xml:
$s
Hello,
it looks that many branches still exist after being merged, discovered
by running git-sweep. The list is next.
If anyone from devs or users spots a branch that was not merged and
needs to be reviewed, let me know. In several days I plan to remove them
to keep the git repo a bit more sane.
Hi Igor,
Can you paste the relevant portion of the Kamailio config? I'd be
curious as to why any reinvite should be "discarded" from a logical
point of view.
On 04/18/2016 12:02 PM, Igor Potjevlesch wrote:
Hello,
I'm trying to understand why a RE-INVITE is still discard by Kamailio
(4.2.6)
I'm curious what issue you're trying to fix or what functionality you're
trying to add? If we know the contact, we might be able to suggest a
kamailio only solution.
On Mon, Apr 18, 2016 at 5:26 PM, Juha Heinanen wrote:
> Alex Balashov writes:
>
> > No, Kamailio cannot build new, independent cal
Alex Balashov writes:
> No, Kamailio cannot build new, independent call legs. This is a
> function of a B2BUA.
Yes, real easy with SEMS, for example.
-- Juha
___
SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list
sr-users@lists.si
Hello,
I'm trying to understand why a RE-INVITE is still discard by Kamailio
(4.2.6). The RE-INVITE has the last Contact URI as Request-URI which is not
Kamailio himself. But there are the route headers set.
What are the other checks done by the function "loose_route()"?
Regards,
Ig
No, Kamailio cannot build new, independent call legs. This is a function of a
B2BUA.
--
Alex Balashov | Principal | Evariste Systems LLC
1447 Peachtree Street NE, Suite 700
Atlanta, GA 30309
United States
Tel: +1-800-250-5920 (toll-free) / +1-678-954-0671 (direct)
Web: http://www.evaristesys.co
Hi all,
I'm trying to make a blind call forward to "1002" if a UA calls "1" into
Kamailio. At the moment I have the following config:
if ( $rU=~"^[1]$" && src_ip==$sel(cfg_get.pstn.gw_ip) ) {
sl_send_reply("181", "Redirecting");
$ru =
Run with debug =3 in kamailio.cfg and look at the syslog file to see if
you spot anything that could give hints about what happens around. If
you are getting too many messages and feel it is hard to analyze them,
you can load debugger module and set debug level to 3 only for
dispatcher module.
Che
Thx you Daniel, actually i am running kamailio 4.1.7
[root@af173cb12922 /]# kamailio -v
version: kamailio 4.1.7 (x86_64/linux) 85ffd9
But Marrold was right it appears Kamailio does not probe correctly my asterisk
boxes :-(
[root@af173cb12922 /]# kamctl mi ds_list
SET_NO:: 1
SET:: 1
URI:
Hello,
"kamctl dispatcher dump" should not require anymore a db engine -- what
is the version of kamailio you are using?
Anyhow, you can do the raw mi command like:
kamctl mi ds_list
To reload is:
kamct mi ds_reload
Cheers,
Daniel
On 18/04/16 13:04, Sébastien Brice wrote:
> Hi Marrold,
>
> k
Hi Marrold,
kamctl dispatcher dump
ERROR: This command requires a database engine - none was loaded
I thought i could run dispatcher module without database, it appears my strange
behavior comes from this: i do not use a database.
Instead I am usinq a flat dispatcher.list file:
# Autogenerated @
13 matches
Mail list logo
