Re: [SR-Users] Browser WebRTC transcoder

2016-05-18 Thread Daniel-Constantin Mierla
What codecs are supported by your grandstream? Isn't the g711 in the group? Cheers, Daniel On 19/05/16 01:51, Moacir Ferreira wrote: > I did not dig into the problem but on my tests I saw that my (old) > Grandstream phone was refusing the call for not having a compatible > codec to talk with

Re: [SR-Users] Browser WebRTC transcoder

2016-05-18 Thread Moacir Ferreira
I did not dig into the problem but on my tests I saw that my (old) Grandstream phone was refusing the call for not having a compatible codec to talk with the offered ones by the browser (Firefox). Being this the case, I guess I must include a translator, and all routing logic, in between the

Re: [SR-Users] Browser WebRTC transcoder

2016-05-18 Thread Richard Fuchs
On 18/05/16 04:57 PM, Moacir Ferreira wrote: Hey Daniel, If you say so, you probably right... I did not try it because on the sipwise GitHub (https://github.com/sipwise/rtpengine) they mention: /"Rtpengine does not (yet) support:/ // * /Repacketization or transcoding/ This refers to

Re: [SR-Users] [kamailio 5.0] upgrade VS rollback/backward compatibility

2016-05-18 Thread Alex Hermann
On dinsdag 12 april 2016 11:42:53 CEST Alex Lutay wrote: > The point here that Kamailio checks DB table_version and doesn't start > if the version mismatch found. As long as table versions are backwards compatible, just use a separate "version" table for each Kamailio version you deploy. Set the

Re: [SR-Users] Sipcapture on SPARC

2016-05-18 Thread Spencer Thomason
Hi Daniel, I know its been some time since looking at this but I finally had the time to dig deeper. It appears that the timestamps inserted by the sip trace module are in host order, not network order. This obviously creates an issue when the endianess of the agent and capture server do not

Re: [SR-Users] Browser WebRTC transcoder

2016-05-18 Thread Moacir Ferreira
Hey Daniel, If you say so, you probably right... I did not try it because on the sipwise GitHub (https://github.com/sipwise/rtpengine) they mention: "Rtpengine does not (yet) support: Repacketization or transcodingPlayback of pre-recorded streams/announcementsRecording of media streamsZRTP"

Re: [SR-Users] Browser WebRTC transcoder

2016-05-18 Thread Daniel-Constantin Mierla
Hello, kamailio+rtpengine should do this job quite well. Cheers, Daniel On 18/05/16 19:16, Moacir Ferreira wrote: > A question for the community: > > What would be your best advice for a RTP proxy/transcoder to allow > browser WebRTC calls to legacy VoIP? > > Moacir > > >

[SR-Users] Browser WebRTC transcoder

2016-05-18 Thread Moacir Ferreira
A question for the community: What would be your best advice for a RTP proxy/transcoder to allow browser WebRTC calls to legacy VoIP? Moacir ___ SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users

Re: [SR-Users] WebRTC

2016-05-18 Thread Moacir Ferreira
Great Daniel! Problem solved. Thanks, Moacir To: sr-users@lists.sip-router.org From: mico...@gmail.com Date: Wed, 18 May 2016 07:08:02 +0200 Subject: Re: [SR-Users] WebRTC Hello, if you don't have a trusted certificate, then browse first to https://kamailioip:5061