Re: [SR-Users] Dispatcher Module - Hava limit?

2017-03-10 Thread Rodrigo Moreira
Hi Daniel-Constantin, As follows in the attached image this is the output of the command systemctl status kamailio.service. One important thing, the machine that hosts my Kamailio service is using high storage almost 100%, is this the problem of so many errors when I try to make more than 200CPS?

Re: [SR-Users] Dispatcher Module - Hava limit?

2017-03-10 Thread Rodrigo Moreira
Hello everyone, I found the problem. It was just memory shortage, I allocated more memory from 64 MB to 256 and it worked. Thank you all. On Fri, Mar 10, 2017 at 6:09 PM, Rodrigo Moreira < rodrigo.moreira...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Daniel-Constantin, > > As follows in the attached image this is

Re: [SR-Users] Multiple parallel branches, one invalid

2017-03-10 Thread Anthony Joseph Messina
On Thursday, March 9, 2017 8:16:55 PM CST Nathan Ward wrote: > I have a scenario I’m not sure of the best way to solve. > > I use alias_db and have multiple destinations for a single number, and have > append_branches set to 1. I then use lookup_branches to get details from > the location table fo

Re: [SR-Users] 404 not here for BYE

2017-03-10 Thread Daniel-Constantin Mierla
Hello, there were some answers to your previous email, see them in the archive: - http://lists.sip-router.org/pipermail/sr-users/2017-March/date.html Cheers, Daniel On 10/03/2017 14:10, Mikhail Khomenkov wrote: > Hi > > i have some kind of issue with BYE > Asterisk send invite to Kamailio1,

Re: [SR-Users] [SIP Transaction] Handle Cancel message

2017-03-10 Thread Daniel-Constantin Mierla
Hello, the pcap files don't show much when I open them, maybe the email servers/clients corrupted the enconding, as I faced similar issues in the past -- can you make a tgz archive and resend them? Cheers, Daniel On 10/03/2017 04:49, Hai Bui Duc Ha wrote: > Hi Daniel, > > I send you 2 files pca

[SR-Users] 404 not here for BYE

2017-03-10 Thread Mikhail Khomenkov
Hi i have some kind of issue with BYE Asterisk send invite to Kamailio1, Kamailio1 proxy to Kamailio2, Kamailio2 found UAC and send invite to it. UAC response 200OK -> Kamailio2 -> Kamailio1 -> Asterisk. Session established. But then UAC sending BYE to Kamailio2 , Kamailio2 sending it to Kamailio

Re: [SR-Users] sip6 BYE

2017-03-10 Thread Daniel-Constantin Mierla
Hello, there is a config issue with the Contact alias. It has to be done only on the Kamailio proxy that is first receiving the SIP message (request or reply) -- in other words, when Kamailio is the first node after the end point. So Kamailio1 has to do set_contact_alias() only for messages comin

Re: [SR-Users] sip6 BYE

2017-03-10 Thread Arsen
Hi Mikhail, probably Kamailio1 routes BYE request based on alias in the request uri: BYE sip:6093756295@54.236.97.30:5060;alias=107.21.18.6~5060~1 SIP/2.0. http://kamailio.org/docs/modules/4.4.x/modules/nathelper.html#nathelper.f.handle_ruri_alias On Fri, Mar 10, 2017 at 4:58 AM, Mikhail Khomenko

[SR-Users] sip6 BYE

2017-03-10 Thread Mikhail Khomenkov
Hi i have some kind of issue with BYE Asterisk send invite to Kamailio1, Kamailio1 proxy to Kamailio2, Kamailio2 found UAC and send invite to it. UAC response 200OK -> Kamailio2 -> Kamailio1 -> Asterisk. Session established. But then UAC sending BYE to Kamailio2 , Kamailio2 sending it to Kamailio