Re: [SR-Users] Recent problem with fix_nated_sdp and kamailio 4.4.4

2016-11-28 Thread Anthony Messina
family bridging? if(af==INET && isbflagset(FLB_RTPENGINE_IP6)) { setbflag(FLB_RTPENGINE); } else if(af==INET6 && !isbflagset(FLB_RTPENGINE_IP6)) { setbflag(FLB_RTPENGINE); }

Re: [SR-Users] Recent problem with fix_nated_sdp and kamailio 4.4.4

2016-11-28 Thread Anthony Messina
28/11/2016 09:02, Anthony Messina wrote: Prior to the upgrade to Kamailio 4.4.4, I was using 4.4.3 with updates through 81df84b from the 4.4 branch and the following fix_nated_sdp call worked through the initial INVITE and when a voicemail branch was appended from the failure_route. route[NAT

Re: [SR-Users] how to set kamctl to find ctl anf fifo that are not at /var/run

2016-05-31 Thread Anthony Messina
On Tuesday, May 31, 2016 11:43:30 AM Uri Shacked wrote: > Hi, > > I am using centos 7. > By default on centos 7, the var/run file system is tmpfs. > So, when kamailio runs with user and group other than root, it can not > create the fifo file. > > I set the kamailio service and config files to

Re: [SR-Users] 4.4 crash at start

2016-04-06 Thread Anthony Messina
On Wednesday, April 06, 2016 09:22:21 PM Juha Heinanen wrote: > Daniel-Constantin Mierla writes: > > Thanks! Can you try with the patch > > 1545b8de396e8e5d0ef24c9102beff18b3cf36e5? > > I tried and there was no crash. > > > Also, check that all listen ip addresses are actually used by kamailio >

Re: [SR-Users] Trouble initializing TLS on Fedora 23

2016-04-02 Thread Anthony Messina
On Tuesday, January 05, 2016 07:32:32 PM Daniel-Constantin Mierla wrote: > Hello, > > On 02/01/16 03:11, Anthony Messina wrote: > > On Friday, January 01, 2016 04:43:56 PM Bruce Ferrell wrote: > >> On 01/01/2016 03:34 PM, Anthony Messina wrote: > >>> Ha

Re: [SR-Users] rfc: kamailio.cfg polishing for v4.4

2016-02-19 Thread Anthony Messina
On Tuesday, February 09, 2016 08:45:23 AM Daniel-Constantin Mierla wrote: > Hello, > > wondering if people feel it is need to polish the current default > kamailio.cfg, to prepare the version for next major release. It can be > browsed online at: > > -

Re: [SR-Users] Trouble initializing TLS on Fedora 23

2016-01-11 Thread Anthony Messina
On Wednesday, January 06, 2016 02:54:42 PM Daniel-Constantin Mierla wrote: > On 06/01/16 13:57, Anthony Messina wrote: > > On Tuesday, January 05, 2016 07:32:32 PM Daniel-Constantin Mierla wrote: > >> Hello, > >> > >> On 02/01/16 03:11, Anthony Messina wrote:

Re: [SR-Users] Trouble initializing TLS on Fedora 23

2016-01-06 Thread Anthony Messina
On Tuesday, January 05, 2016 07:32:32 PM Daniel-Constantin Mierla wrote: > Hello, > > On 02/01/16 03:11, Anthony Messina wrote: > > On Friday, January 01, 2016 04:43:56 PM Bruce Ferrell wrote: > >> On 01/01/2016 03:34 PM, Anthony Messina wrote: > >>> Ha

Re: [SR-Users] Trouble initializing TLS on Fedora 23

2016-01-01 Thread Anthony Messina
On Friday, January 01, 2016 04:43:56 PM Bruce Ferrell wrote: > On 01/01/2016 03:34 PM, Anthony Messina wrote: > > Happy New Year! > > > > I've just upgraded my Kamailio (build from master@c7e411e) instance to > > Fedora 23 from Fedora 22. I've built the packages spe

[SR-Users] Trouble initializing TLS on Fedora 23

2016-01-01 Thread Anthony Messina
Happy New Year! I've just upgraded my Kamailio (build from master@c7e411e) instance to Fedora 23 from Fedora 22. I've built the packages specifically for Fedora 23 with the following current sources: openssl-1.0.2e-3.fc23.x86_64 openssl-libs-1.0.2e-3.fc23.x86_64 openssl version reports...

Re: [SR-Users] TLS not enough memory issue with git master

2015-11-24 Thread Anthony Messina
modparam for this test. Thanks. -A Quoting Anthony Messina <amess...@messinet.com>: I have re-enabled the close_expired_tcp modparam and will report back when I have results. Thanks Camille. -A -- Anthony - https://messinet.com/ On November 23, 2015 3:46:55 AM CST, Camille Oudot <c

Re: [SR-Users] TLS not enough memory issue with git master

2015-11-23 Thread Anthony Messina
I have re-enabled the close_expired_tcp modparam and will report back when I have results. Thanks Camille. -A -- Anthony - https://messinet.com/ On November 23, 2015 3:46:55 AM CST, Camille Oudot <camille.ou...@orange.com> wrote: >Le Sun, 22 Nov 2015 15:22:06 -0600, >Anthony Me

Re: [SR-Users] TLS not enough memory issue with git master

2015-11-22 Thread Anthony Messina
ml -A On Wednesday, November 18, 2015 06:26:46 AM Anthony Messina wrote: > I was just letting you know how I build it, but yes, I will test with just > the bare master branch this weekend. After a restart, this issue takes a > few hours to happen, making it difficult to reproduce in testing. -

Re: [SR-Users] TLS not enough memory issue with git master

2015-11-18 Thread Anthony Messina
here. > > Can you test with bare master branch? > > Cheers, > Daniel > > On 18/11/15 02:16, Anthony Messina wrote: > > Sorry for the delay, I just got home from my $PAYINGJOB. And thanks a lot > > for helping figure this out. > > > > I build

Re: [SR-Users] TLS not enough memory issue with git master

2015-11-17 Thread Anthony Messina
you run latest version? > > Can you look at available shared memory? > > kamctl stats shmem > > Check it over time and see if the free memory is decreasing. > > Cheers, > Daniel > > On 17/11/15 00:44, Anthony Messina wrote: > > I have noticed the followi

Re: [SR-Users] TLS not enough memory issue with git master

2015-11-17 Thread Anthony Messina
niel > > On 17/11/15 14:59, Anthony Messina wrote: > > Attached. -A > > > > On Tuesday, November 17, 2015 02:50:21 PM Daniel-Constantin Mierla wrote: > >> Can you run the following commands: > >> > >> kamcmd cfg.set_now_int core memlog 1 >

Re: [SR-Users] TLS not enough memory issue with git master

2015-11-17 Thread Anthony Messina
); } } On Tuesday, November 17, 2015 09:39:28 PM Daniel-Constantin Mierla wrote: > Looking at the logs of last commits, I couldn't spot the change that > would add the leak. > > What is the exact version you are running (kamailio -v)? > > Are you

[SR-Users] TLS not enough memory issue with git master

2015-11-16 Thread Anthony Messina
I have noticed the following issue which began with builds somewhere between git master commits bff0a08 and 6173ef7. I did not see this issue with my previous builds and haven't been able to pin down the problem, which is why I haven't formally filed a bug. Any help or guidance is appreciated,

Re: [SR-Users] Websockets, set_contact_alias(), IPv6

2015-04-07 Thread Anthony Messina
On Tuesday, April 07, 2015 09:42:00 AM Daniel-Constantin Mierla wrote: On 07/04/15 05:32, Anthony Messina wrote: On Sunday, March 29, 2015 08:57:44 PM Anthony Messina wrote: On Sunday, March 29, 2015 05:23:26 PM Anthony Messina wrote: I've been working on Kamailio websocket integration

Re: [SR-Users] Websockets, set_contact_alias(), IPv6

2015-04-06 Thread Anthony Messina
On Sunday, March 29, 2015 08:57:44 PM Anthony Messina wrote: On Sunday, March 29, 2015 05:23:26 PM Anthony Messina wrote: I've been working on Kamailio websocket integration and I believe I'm having issues with the IPv6 address representation in the Contact header's alias parameter. After

Re: [SR-Users] Recommendation for toggling MSILO m_store auto-notification reply on/off

2015-04-01 Thread Anthony Messina
On Monday, September 08, 2014 05:01:50 PM Anthony Messina wrote: On Monday, September 08, 2014 03:04:38 PM Daniel-Constantin Mierla wrote: I don't recall any commit adding such feature, but should be easy to add a new parameter to m_store() to control this behaviour -- it requires writing

Re: [SR-Users] Websockets, set_contact_alias(), IPv6

2015-03-29 Thread Anthony Messina
On Sunday, March 29, 2015 05:23:26 PM Anthony Messina wrote: I've been working on Kamailio websocket integration and I believe I'm having issues with the IPv6 address representation in the Contact header's alias parameter. After Googling, it appears after https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio

[SR-Users] Websockets, set_contact_alias(), IPv6

2015-03-29 Thread Anthony Messina
I've been working on Kamailio websocket integration and I believe I'm having issues with the IPv6 address representation in the Contact header's alias parameter. After Googling, it appears after https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/commit/814c08f3 the IPv6 contact is represented in brackets

Re: [SR-Users] Routing PSTN calls from Asterisk through Kamailio to UAC loose_route

2015-03-27 Thread Anthony Messina
Vitaliy, thank you for being a second set of eyes on this. This issue was my fault completely--I had neglected to remove the fromdomain parameter on the Asterisk side when I was testing something else, so the calls coming from Asterisk were of course appearing to come from example.com which

[SR-Users] Routing PSTN calls from Asterisk through Kamailio to UAC loose_route

2015-03-25 Thread Anthony Messina
I've been working on integration of Asterisk and Kamailio, currently on the same host with different ports, and have come across a problem with calls that originate from the Asterisk side (PSTN/DAHDI) and route through Kamailio to a SIP UAC. In short, when the SIP UAC (10.1.1.9) sends the BYE,

Re: [SR-Users] msilo module

2015-03-24 Thread Anthony Messina
On Monday, March 23, 2015 04:33:14 PM Rajat Yadav wrote: Hello i m very new to kamailio.I m trying to develop an application using webrtc and kamailio. In this i tried using msilo module so as to store offline messages but wasnt able to achieve it.After that i searched a lot on internet about

Re: [SR-Users] kamailio asterisk NOTIFY

2015-03-24 Thread Anthony Messina
On Monday, March 23, 2015 06:42:59 PM Alex Balashov wrote: Anthony, The Contact presented by the subscriber in the initial subscription is: m: Test User sip:172.16.4.7;line=sr-D8G7CE2.5PUeK-xuarl7NYDdNYDxNYlFUYoeUeQ8Cw.6DE2vDdyJ

Re: [SR-Users] kamailio asterisk NOTIFY

2015-03-24 Thread Anthony Messina
On Tuesday, March 24, 2015 04:08:16 PM Anthony Messina wrote: On Monday, March 23, 2015 06:42:59 PM Alex Balashov wrote: Anthony, The Contact presented by the subscriber in the initial subscription is: m: Test User sip:172.16.4.7;line=sr-D8G7CE2.5PUeK

Re: [SR-Users] kamailio asterisk NOTIFY

2015-03-23 Thread Anthony Messina
On Monday, March 23, 2015 11:18:01 PM Daniel-Constantin Mierla wrote: Hello, not sure you mean transaction as used inside kamailio (tm module), but a SIP transaction doesn't have anything to do with routing. Kamailio will be able to route requests/replies even when not creating transactions

Re: [SR-Users] kamailio asterisk NOTIFY

2015-03-23 Thread Anthony Messina
On Monday, March 23, 2015 06:26:50 PM Alex Balashov wrote: Hello Anthony, On 03/23/2015 06:24 PM, Anthony Messina wrote: In my case I am using the TOPOH module and it appears Asterisk may be truncating the Request-URI on NOTIFYs*after* the 1st one. Where the 1st one is if a user gets

Re: [SR-Users] Parser error with sql_pvquery?

2015-03-11 Thread Anthony Messina
On Wednesday, March 11, 2015 06:08:04 PM Anthony Messina wrote: I'm trying to do an sql_pvquery() and have PostgreSQL return the default value using COALESCE (if the other parts of the query return NULL) rather than placing the $null check on the return in the Kamailio script. I seem

[SR-Users] Parser error with sql_pvquery?

2015-03-11 Thread Anthony Messina
I'm trying to do an sql_pvquery() and have PostgreSQL return the default value using COALESCE (if the other parts of the query return NULL) rather than placing the $null check on the return in the Kamailio script. I seem to be coming up on a parser issue, perhaps too many nested parentheses:

Re: [SR-Users] Group call advice: remove calling branch after alias_db_lookup/lookup_branches

2015-03-07 Thread Anthony Messina
On Saturday, March 07, 2015 10:22:32 AM Olle E. Johansson wrote: On 07 Mar 2015, at 01:32, Anthony Messina amess...@messinet.com wrote: In terms of implementing group calling via the append_branch feature of both alias_db_lookup followed by lookup_branches, I'm looking for a reliable way

[SR-Users] Group call advice: remove calling branch after alias_db_lookup/lookup_branches

2015-03-06 Thread Anthony Messina
In terms of implementing group calling via the append_branch feature of both alias_db_lookup followed by lookup_branches, I'm looking for a reliable way to ensure that if the caller happens to be a member of the group (list of branches), the branch that's created to the original caller is

Re: [SR-Users] WARNING: core [local_timer.c:83]: _local_timer_dist_tl(): 0 expire timer added?

2015-03-05 Thread Anthony Messina
On Thursday, March 05, 2015 12:34:36 PM Camille Oudot wrote: Are you saying that $avp(caller_conid) when set on the initial INVITE, for example, wouldn't be available in the onreply_route to the INVITE? If so, the examples in the TCP Ops README will need to reflect the need for using

Re: [SR-Users] WARNING: core [local_timer.c:83]: _local_timer_dist_tl(): 0 expire timer added?

2015-03-04 Thread Anthony Messina
On Monday, March 02, 2015 08:41:27 AM Daniel-Constantin Mierla wrote: On 01/03/15 22:54, Anthony Messina wrote: On Friday, February 27, 2015 07:08:05 AM Anthony Messina wrote: On Friday, February 27, 2015 11:53:22 Camille Oudot wrote: Le Sat, 21 Feb 2015 12:47:08 -0600, Anthony Messina

Re: [SR-Users] WARNING: core [local_timer.c:83]: _local_timer_dist_tl(): 0 expire timer added?

2015-03-02 Thread Anthony Messina
On Monday, March 02, 2015 08:41:27 Daniel-Constantin Mierla wrote: On 01/03/15 22:54, Anthony Messina wrote: On Friday, February 27, 2015 07:08:05 AM Anthony Messina wrote: On Friday, February 27, 2015 11:53:22 Camille Oudot wrote: Le Sat, 21 Feb 2015 12:47:08 -0600, Anthony Messina

Re: [SR-Users] WARNING: core [local_timer.c:83]: _local_timer_dist_tl(): 0 expire timer added?

2015-03-01 Thread Anthony Messina
On Friday, February 27, 2015 07:08:05 AM Anthony Messina wrote: On Friday, February 27, 2015 11:53:22 Camille Oudot wrote: Le Sat, 21 Feb 2015 12:47:08 -0600, Anthony Messina amess...@messinet.com a écrit : Good day. Is anyone able to let me in on what this means WARNING: core

Re: [SR-Users] WARNING: core [local_timer.c:83]: _local_timer_dist_tl(): 0 expire timer added?

2015-02-27 Thread Anthony Messina
On Friday, February 27, 2015 11:53:22 Camille Oudot wrote: Le Sat, 21 Feb 2015 12:47:08 -0600, Anthony Messina amess...@messinet.com a écrit : Good day. Is anyone able to let me in on what this means WARNING: core [local_timer.c:83]: _local_timer_dist_tl(): 0 expire timer added? I just

[SR-Users] [SOLVED] Re: RTPEngine IPv4 to IPv6 bridging returning c=IN IP4 0.0.0.0 on answer?

2015-02-25 Thread Anthony Messina
On Wednesday, February 25, 2015 08:31:38 AM Richard Fuchs wrote: On 24/02/15 08:20 PM, Anthony Messina wrote: This is probably very likely a configuration issue on my part, but I wanted to check before reporting an RTPEngine bug... Thank you for any pointers or suggestions

Re: [SR-Users] allow_trusted and ipv6 addresses

2015-02-24 Thread Anthony Messina
On Tuesday, February 24, 2015 12:35:54 Daniel-Constantin Mierla wrote: On 24/02/15 00:05, Anthony Messina wrote: On Monday, February 23, 2015 09:53:08 AM Daniel-Constantin Mierla wrote: trusted does string comparison for the address field, it is not considered an ip address. You should

Re: [SR-Users] 2 TLS issues/questions: per-client config IPv6 client

2015-02-24 Thread Anthony Messina
to see if works? Cheers, Daniel Yes Daniel, I'll try it again this evening when I get home from work. Thanks again! -A On 24/02/15 04:09, Anthony Messina wrote: On Monday, February 23, 2015 11:26:27 AM Daniel-Constantin Mierla wrote: Hello, can you try with latest master? After just

Re: [SR-Users] RTPEngine IPv4 to IPv6 bridging returning c=IN IP4 0.0.0.0 on answer?

2015-02-24 Thread Anthony Messina
On Tuesday, February 24, 2015 08:30:48 PM Sergey Okhapkin wrote: Which IP address has been sent to carrier in SDP offer? GLOBAL_IPv6 or EXTERNAL_IPv4? GLOBAL_IPv6 On Tuesday 24 February 2015 19:20:15 Anthony Messina wrote: This is probably very likely a configuration issue on my part

[SR-Users] RTPEngine IPv4 to IPv6 bridging returning c=IN IP4 0.0.0.0 on answer?

2015-02-24 Thread Anthony Messina
This is probably very likely a configuration issue on my part, but I wanted to check before reporting an RTPEngine bug... Thank you for any pointers or suggestions. This is a multi-homed server where em1: INTERNAL_IPv4 GLOBAL_IPv6 em2: EXTERNAL_IPv4 Note that below, the IPv6 address on my

Re: [SR-Users] 2 TLS issues/questions: per-client config IPv6 client

2015-02-24 Thread Anthony Messina
On 24/02/15 04:09, Anthony Messina wrote: On Monday, February 23, 2015 11:26:27 AM Daniel-Constantin Mierla wrote: Hello, can you try with latest master? After just quick view of sources, I spotted some issue identifying ipv6 address and pushed a small patch for it, but no time

Re: [SR-Users] allow_trusted and ipv6 addresses

2015-02-23 Thread Anthony Messina
On Monday, February 23, 2015 09:53:08 AM Daniel-Constantin Mierla wrote: trusted does string comparison for the address field, it is not considered an ip address. You should use address table instead if you just need matching on any ip address or subnet. That's interesting. Is there a

Re: [SR-Users] 2 TLS issues/questions: per-client config IPv6 client

2015-02-23 Thread Anthony Messina
identifying ipv6 address and pushed a small patch for it, but no time to test it for now. Cheers, Daniel On 23/02/15 10:01, Daniel-Constantin Mierla wrote: Hello, On 23/02/15 02:16, Anthony Messina wrote: I'm wondering if anyone can point me in the right direction for the following two

Re: [SR-Users] 2 TLS issues/questions: per-client config IPv6 client

2015-02-23 Thread Anthony Messina
On Monday, February 23, 2015 11:31:27 PM Daniel-Constantin Mierla wrote: I just pushed a patch to lookup client tls profile using bind address (if available), instead of local source address for the connection, trying to avoid matching on a randomly allocated port by os. Let me know if works

Re: [SR-Users] 2 TLS issues/questions: per-client config IPv6 client

2015-02-23 Thread Anthony Messina
On Monday, February 23, 2015 11:26:27 AM Daniel-Constantin Mierla wrote: Hello, can you try with latest master? After just quick view of sources, I spotted some issue identifying ipv6 address and pushed a small patch for it, but no time to test it for now. Cheers, Daniel snip 2.

Re: [SR-Users] WARNING: core [local_timer.c:83]: _local_timer_dist_tl(): 0 expire timer added?

2015-02-22 Thread Anthony Messina
On Sunday, February 22, 2015 12:16:33 PM Daniel-Constantin Mierla wrote: Hello, On 22/02/15 01:09, Anthony Messina wrote: On Saturday, February 21, 2015 12:47:08 PM Anthony Messina wrote: Good day. Is anyone able to let me in on what this means WARNING: core [local_timer.c:83

[SR-Users] 2 TLS issues/questions: per-client config IPv6 client

2015-02-22 Thread Anthony Messina
I'm wondering if anyone can point me in the right direction for the following two issues with Kamailio and tls.cfg 1. When attempting to configure TLS settings for connecting to a specific IPv4 client, it seems that the ca_list indicated in [client:default] overrides the one in the

Re: [SR-Users] WARNING: core [local_timer.c:83]: _local_timer_dist_tl(): 0 expire timer added?

2015-02-21 Thread Anthony Messina
On Saturday, February 21, 2015 12:47:08 PM Anthony Messina wrote: Good day. Is anyone able to let me in on what this means WARNING: core [local_timer.c:83]: _local_timer_dist_tl(): 0 expire timer added? I just started seeing this after pulling down 5c1a9df from git and it seems like

[SR-Users] WARNING: core [local_timer.c:83]: _local_timer_dist_tl(): 0 expire timer added?

2015-02-21 Thread Anthony Messina
Good day. Is anyone able to let me in on what this means WARNING: core [local_timer.c:83]: _local_timer_dist_tl(): 0 expire timer added? I just started seeing this after pulling down 5c1a9df from git and it seems like something that I probably don't want happening. -- Anthony -

Re: [SR-Users] Issue with dlg_setflag vs. setflag

2015-02-05 Thread Anthony Messina
. Cheers, Daniel On 31/01/15 23:10, Anthony Messina wrote: I'm currently using Kamailio built from master@e59db79 and have been following the recent threads about the dialog module as I'm moving toward adding dialog support for presence and CDRs in my setup. However, I seem to have come across

[SR-Users] acc.so segfault using 4.3.0-dev2 (6daafdb5b6c9fc72698d43f81656bd511cacce69)

2014-12-07 Thread Anthony Messina
I get repeatable segfaults with acc.so in 4.3.0-dev2. Fedora 20 x86_64. Debug log attached. -A -- Anthony - https://messinet.com/ - https://messinet.com/~amessina/gallery 8F89 5E72 8DF0 BCF0 10BE 9967 92DC 35DC B001 4A4E kamailio[18398]: segfault at 7ff499e47010 ip 7ff499bf94c2 sp

Re: [SR-Users] acc.so segfault using 4.3.0-dev2 (6daafdb5b6c9fc72698d43f81656bd511cacce69)

2014-12-07 Thread Anthony Messina
On Sunday, December 07, 2014 07:22:07 PM Daniel-Constantin Mierla wrote: Can you send the modparam lines for acc module? Here are related config lines: #!define WITH_ACCDB #!define ACCDB_COMMENT #!define FLT_ACC 1 #!define FLT_ACCMISSED 2 #!define FLT_ACCFAILED 3 #!ifdef ACCDB_COMMENT ALTER

Re: [SR-Users] acc.so segfault using 4.3.0-dev2 (6daafdb5b6c9fc72698d43f81656bd511cacce69)

2014-12-07 Thread Anthony Messina
On Sunday, December 07, 2014 08:28:55 PM Daniel-Constantin Mierla wrote: Hello, thanks for the backtrace, it helped to find quickly and fix the issue. Patch should be on master now. I see. I'll rebuild and test. Thanks. -A -- Anthony - https://messinet.com/ -

Re: [SR-Users] acc.so segfault using 4.3.0-dev2 (6daafdb5b6c9fc72698d43f81656bd511cacce69)

2014-12-07 Thread Anthony Messina
On Sunday, December 07, 2014 09:00:07 PM Daniel-Constantin Mierla wrote: On 07/12/14 20:34, Anthony Messina wrote: On Sunday, December 07, 2014 08:28:55 PM Daniel-Constantin Mierla wrote: Hello, thanks for the backtrace, it helped to find quickly and fix the issue. Patch should

Re: [SR-Users] Error when using function lookup_branches

2014-11-29 Thread Anthony Messina
077c8d058cdc633563b0d9f14af332ae Let me know if all works fine in order to backport. Cheers, Daniel On 26/11/14 00:54, Anthony Messina wrote: On Tuesday, November 25, 2014 11:43:36 PM Daniel-Constantin Mierla wrote: Hello, finally got to it -- the double free message is printed when destroying the sip

Re: [SR-Users] Error when using function lookup_branches

2014-11-25 Thread Anthony Messina
On Tuesday, November 25, 2014 11:43:36 PM Daniel-Constantin Mierla wrote: Hello, finally got to it -- the double free message is printed when destroying the sip message. Quickly looking at the code, the r-uri, ruid, user-agen and dst-uri (and some other attributes of the first branch, but

Re: [SR-Users] Error when using function lookup_branches

2014-11-18 Thread Anthony Messina
No problem, Daniel. Thanks again for hekping us out. -A Quoting Daniel-Constantin Mierla mico...@gmail.com: Unfortunately I didn't have time to analyze -- it may still take a bit, being traveling with a broken laptop. Cheers, Daniel On 17/11/14 22:49, Anthony Messina wrote: On Tuesday

Re: [SR-Users] Error when using function lookup_branches

2014-11-17 Thread Anthony Messina
On Tuesday, November 11, 2014 09:29:26 AM Daniel-Constantin Mierla wrote: looks like there is a double free, which, although is good to find and fix, is normally safe for runtime. Can you set debug=3 and send all the log messages here? Cheers, Daniel Daniel, were the logs that we posted

Re: [SR-Users] Error when using function lookup_branches

2014-11-10 Thread Anthony Messina
On Monday, November 10, 2014 06:56:08 PM J Hazenberg wrote: Hello, I'm runnig kamailio 4.2.0 and using the lookup_branches function from the register module to lookup all branches after a alias_db_lookup. The function seems to work fine but i see the following error in the log file just

Re: [SR-Users] Error when using function lookup_branches

2014-11-10 Thread Anthony Messina
On Monday, November 10, 2014 11:35:11 PM Anthony Messina wrote: On Monday, November 10, 2014 06:56:08 PM J Hazenberg wrote: Hello, I'm runnig kamailio 4.2.0 and using the lookup_branches function from the register module to lookup all branches after a alias_db_lookup

Re: [SR-Users] rtpengine not working with append_branch

2014-10-27 Thread Anthony Messina
); rtpproxy_manage(co-sp); t_on_reply(MANAGE_CLASSIC_REPLY); } } 2014-10-27 2:34 GMT+04:00 Anthony Messina amess...@messinet.com: On Monday, October 27, 2014 02:20:52 AM Yuriy Gorlichenko wrote: I fixed this. rtpengine must handle each of branches at branch_route(). Not that is fine. Thanks

Re: [SR-Users] rtpengine not working with append_branch

2014-10-26 Thread Anthony Messina
On Monday, October 27, 2014 02:20:52 AM Yuriy Gorlichenko wrote: I fixed this. rtpengine must handle each of branches at branch_route(). Not that is fine. Thanks for link. It was not my issue but with it i find right way. Yuriy, I'm fairly new to Kamailio and have been following your issue as

Re: [SR-Users] Recommendation for toggling MSILO m_store auto-notification reply on/off

2014-09-08 Thread Anthony Messina
On Monday, September 08, 2014 03:04:38 PM Daniel-Constantin Mierla wrote: I don't recall any commit adding such feature, but should be easy to add a new parameter to m_store() to control this behaviour -- it requires writing some c code, though. Cheers, Daniel On 06/09/14 02:39, Anthony

[SR-Users] Does rtpengine properly handle FQDN in SDP Origin?

2014-08-19 Thread Anthony Messina
I've begun playing with rtpengine (git e0957d1) a little and in my testing: CSipSimple - Kamailio/rtpengine - Asterisk 12/13 I see the following error when parsing SDP from the Asterisk side, possibly related to the use of the FQDN in the Origin: Got valid command from 127.0.0.1:44407: answer -

Re: [SR-Users] Does rtpengine properly handle FQDN in SDP Origin?

2014-08-19 Thread Anthony Messina
On Tuesday, August 19, 2014 04:17:07 PM Richard Fuchs wrote: On 08/19/14 14:53, Anthony Messina wrote: I've begun playing with rtpengine (git e0957d1) a little and in my testing: CSipSimple - Kamailio/rtpengine - Asterisk 12/13 I see the following error when parsing SDP from

Re: [SR-Users] planning the release of v4.1.5

2014-08-06 Thread Anthony Messina
On Wednesday, August 06, 2014 11:21:20 AM Daniel-Constantin Mierla wrote: a note to say that packaging will start after 14:00GMT, if anyone has something to commit on branch 4.1 after, write a short message to sr-dev. Cheers, Daniel Not a big deal, but updating the FSF address for

Re: [SR-Users] planning the release of v4.1.5

2014-08-06 Thread Anthony Messina
, it can be pushed in 4.1. Cheers, Daniel On 06/08/14 15:23, Anthony Messina wrote: On Wednesday, August 06, 2014 11:21:20 AM Daniel-Constantin Mierla wrote: a note to say that packaging will start after 14:00GMT, if anyone has something to commit on branch 4.1 after, write a short message

Re: [SR-Users] 4.1 Compilation issue

2014-08-04 Thread Anthony Messina
On Monday, August 04, 2014 09:01:44 AM Gilbert T. Gutierrez, Jr. wrote: This is a new machine that going to be used for testing. This is the only instance, compiled from GIT. I can try recompiling it but I believe I compiled it with the cfg option as listed. [root@localhost ~]# kamailio -I

Re: [SR-Users] MSILO not checking Expires header if Allow: is absent and Contact: is present but without expires

2014-07-23 Thread Anthony Messina
On Monday, July 21, 2014 10:16:38 AM Daniel-Constantin Mierla wrote: Hello, can you try the patch from next commit? http://git.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/gitweb.cgi/sip-router/?a=commit;h=6559c438 3858d472637807c6ec4dd1e0616507fa If works ok, I will backport. This seems to work well:

Re: [SR-Users] MSILO not checking Expires header if Allow: is absent and Contact: is present but without expires

2014-07-21 Thread Anthony Messina
will backport. Cheers, Daniel On 18/07/14 21:04, Anthony Messina wrote: In setting up Kamailio with MSILO, I've noticed that some sip clients (I'm using CSipSimple), upon un-REGISTER-ing do not send an Allow header, but do send an Expires: 0 header as well as a Contact header. However as the Contact

Re: [SR-Users] Msilo not delivering message (status 408)

2014-07-18 Thread Anthony Messina
On Friday, July 18, 2014 12:01:41 AM Daniel-Constantin Mierla wrote: You should not call m_store() if src_ip==myself -- in this way you avoid to store notification messages that cannot be delivered. Why notifications are not delivered has to be troubleshooted there. Have you tried also with

Re: [SR-Users] Msilo not delivering message (status 408)

2014-07-18 Thread Anthony Messina
On Friday, July 18, 2014 07:32:21 PM Peter Villeneuve wrote: You are a star Anthony! Thanks a lot for sharing your config. It is much appreciated. I'm going to study your config in detail and see if I can get it to work on my install. Cheers, Peter Sure, Peter. One thing I noticed during

[SR-Users] MSILO not checking Expires header if Allow: is absent and Contact: is present but without expires

2014-07-18 Thread Anthony Messina
In setting up Kamailio with MSILO, I've noticed that some sip clients (I'm using CSipSimple), upon un-REGISTER-ing do not send an Allow header, but do send an Expires: 0 header as well as a Contact header. However as the Contact header doesn't contain expires=0, it appears as though the MSILO

Re: [SR-Users] Msilo not delivering message (status 408)

2014-07-18 Thread Anthony Messina
On Friday, July 18, 2014 11:34:27 PM Peter Villeneuve wrote: Hi again, I've been playing around with Anthony's config posted above, and I believe I'm almost there getting msilo to work properly, although it seems that kamailio doesn't correctly recognize the callee is a local subscriber so