Thanks Alex.
And objection duly noted, =) I'll just have to test it out and make sure it
doesn't break any of my other clients.
Thank you,
Jack Davis
On Tue, Mar 14, 2017 at 5:46 PM, Alex Balashov <abalas...@evaristesys.com>
wrote:
> append_to_reply("Record-Route: \r\n"
by
kamailio to a re-invite.
Thank you,
Jack Davis
On Tue, Mar 7, 2017 at 3:49 PM, Alex Balashov <abalas...@evaristesys.com>
wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 07, 2017 at 03:44:31PM -0600, Jack Davis wrote:
>
> > What kind of problems can arise from inserting said header?
>
> Theore
What kind of problems can arise from inserting said header?
I'm trying to find a way to get a pesky setup to start behaving, of course,
without requiring them to make any changes.
Thank you,
Jack Davis
On Fri, Mar 3, 2017 at 2:39 PM, Alex Balashov <abalas...@evaristesys.com>
wrote:
&g
Thank you all for the replies.
I'm already utilizing a record-route header in the initial Invite before
any re-invites occur.
Is the preferred method to also include a record-route header in the 200 OK
that is given in response to the re-invite?
Thank you,
Jack Davis
On Fri, Mar 3, 2017 at 2
dialog ONLY when a
record-route is not used.
I would appreciate any clarification on the RFC or best practices in this
scenario.
Thank you,
Jack Davis
___
SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list
sr-users@lists.sip-rout
