On Thu, Nov 6, 2014 at 11:40 AM, Jan Janak wrote:
> If you prefer to keep a self-hosted git repository, I think we should at
> least move it to gitolite:
> http://gitolite.com/
>
> To make it more manageable (doesn't require ssh access for individual
> people).
>
G
or persons.
>
> We came to the time when one of the servers is too old and considered to
> be decommisioned, so we have to decide how to move on. It is about
> sip-router.org, who was offered/sponsored by courtesy of Jan Janak. From
> project point of view, the server hosts:
>
&
I know this is not a solution, but you can also try to run
dpkg-reconfigure ca-certificates
and select only a couple of CA certificates you trust. That should
make the list much smaller. Debian includes a lot of CA certificates
in its default list and I am not sure whether it is a good idea to
tr
On Mon, Mar 19, 2012 at 05:32, Juha Heinanen wrote:
> as i mentioned, with shared memory of 64MB, sip proxy started fine.
> however, it failed to send a request over tls:
>
> Mar 19 11:21:41 test /usr/sbin/sip-proxy[30293]: INFO: Routing INVITE
>
> Mar 19 11:21:41 test /usr/sbin/sip-proxy[30293]
On Mon, Mar 19, 2012 at 05:31, Daniel-Constantin Mierla
wrote:
> Hello,
>
>
> On 3/19/12 10:03 AM, Juha Heinanen wrote:
>>
>> Daniel-Constantin Mierla writes:
>>
>>> is this with default mem size?
>>
>> i would just like to add that once i increased shared memory from
>> 32m to 64m, sip proxy star
On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 04:53, Daniel-Constantin Mierla
wrote:
> Hello,
>
> from the last IRC devel meetings discussions, one topic was about adding an
> unique id field per user profiles, with the decision to bring it to mailing
> lists for broader audience.
>
> That will help to reference easier
On Tue, Jul 19, 2011 at 22:07, Daniel-Constantin Mierla
wrote:
> Hello,
>
> some comments about all provided options so far:
>
> - google code tracker -- haven't use it at all, going to look a bit at it
>
> - github - maybe I missed some setting, but the issue tracker there seems to
> be to simpli
On Fri, May 27, 2011 at 23:43, Jeff Brower wrote:
> Jan-
>
>> On Wed, May 25, 2011 at 06:54, Jeremya wrote:
>>> These figures pale into insignificance compared to the power required
>>> for standard SIP devices - typically 5-8 watts per device multiplied by
>>> the number of devices.
>>>
>>> When
nd performances...
>
> Thanks,
> Daniel
>
> On 5/25/11 3:00 PM, Jan Janak wrote:
>>
>> On Wed, May 25, 2011 at 06:54, Jeremya wrote:
>>>
>>> These figures pale into insignificance compared to the power required
>>> for standard SIP devices - t
nt base-line power consumption and a portion of that
needs to be attributed to the SIP service running on those servers.
-Jan
> Daniel-Constantin Mierla wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> Jan Janak conducted a very interesting research project regarding
>> energy efficiency of VoI
On Tue, Apr 26, 2011 at 9:19 PM, Klaus Darilion
wrote:
> Jan Janak wrote:
>>
>> On Tue, Apr 26, 2011 at 8:42 PM, Klaus Darilion
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Jan Janak wrote:
>>>>
>>>> On Tue, Apr 26, 2011 at 7:41 PM, Klaus Darilion
>>&g
On Tue, Apr 26, 2011 at 8:42 PM, Klaus Darilion
wrote:
> Jan Janak wrote:
>>
>> On Tue, Apr 26, 2011 at 7:41 PM, Klaus Darilion
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Not helping with this issue - but having another question: what is
>>> $td.did?
>>> Is
On Tue, Apr 26, 2011 at 7:41 PM, Klaus Darilion
wrote:
> Not helping with this issue - but having another question: what is $td.did?
> Is it a pseudo variable (as it starts with $)? Is it somehow related/derived
> to/from $td or is the '.' just a character like a-z?
This is the SER syntax for AVP
If you are unsure which way is better, my recommendation would be
follow the Linux Standard Base (LSB). IIRC it recommends using lib64
in this case.
-Jan
On Thu, Mar 31, 2011 at 7:07 AM, Daniel-Constantin Mierla
wrote:
> Hello,
>
> iirc this was at some point discussed, however, I want to go thr
On Thu, Oct 7, 2010 at 9:16 AM, Andrei Pelinescu-Onciul
wrote:
> On Oct 07, 2010 at 15:52, Juha Heinanen wrote:
>> Andrei Pelinescu-Onciul writes:
>>
>> > > if proxy is processing all invites statefully, why anything needs to be
>> > > done when invite transaction corresponding the to cancel is m
Juha,
On Thu, Oct 7, 2010 at 8:52 AM, Juha Heinanen wrote:
> Andrei Pelinescu-Onciul writes:
>
>> > if proxy is processing all invites statefully, why anything needs to be
>> > done when invite transaction corresponding the to cancel is missing?
>> > isn't it a case of unmatched cancel and the ca
16 matches
Mail list logo
