Re: [SR-Users] Status of db_cassandra

. Regards, Markus > Am 23.03.2017 um 09:51 schrieb Andreas Granig : > > Hi, > > I also believe the module needs to be marked somehow, because it's > implemented against a very old cassandra version and does not work with > recent versions at all. > > I'm afr

Re: [SR-Users] Status of db_cassandra

Hello Daniel, to change the status to „unmaintained“ sounds OK for me. Regards, Markus > Am 21.03.2017 um 13:53 schrieb Daniel-Constantin Mierla : > > Hello, > > having some interest on the module and cassandra being still actual, I tried > to avoid moving it as deprecate

Re: [SR-Users] Status of db_cassandra

Hello Daniel, thanks for the info. Maybe it’s better to put the module into status “Deprecated“? Regards Markus > Am 21.03.2017 um 11:53 schrieb Daniel-Constantin Mierla : > > Hello, > > unfortunately the module db_cassandra was not really maintained and it has > bee

[SR-Users] Status of db_cassandra

Hello, We are thinking about to use kamailio as a sip registrar with cassandra as db backend. As I can see in the documentation for kamailio 5.0 it is only tested with Casandra 1.1.6 and 1.0.1, current version is 3.10 in the meantime. Is anyone using this module with newer versions of Cassandra

[SR-Users] Store and add custom variables for sip registrations

. I’ve also seen that there is a table location_atts in the kamailio db which looks like that it is intended to store custom key value pairs for registrations, but the seems to be no module which writes to that table, or is there one? Thanks for any help or suggestions Markus

Re: [SR-Users] MetaSwitch ignores Contact: header

Thanks to you and Alex. Damn, Alex knows everything about anything it seems. A jack of all trades. Daniel, in this case it's easier for me to just skip Kamailio and have MetaSwitch call Asterisk directly. This is what I'm doing now and it works fine. Thx for your help! M

[SR-Users] MetaSwitch ignores Contact: header

0: SIP/2.0 200 OK NEWVENDOR-IP.5060 > KAMAILIO-IP.5060: ACK sip:number@KAMAILIO-IP:5060 ASTERISK-IP.5060 > KAMAILIO-IP.5060: SIP/2.0 200 OK KAMAILIO-IP.5060 > NEWVENDOR-IP.5060: SIP/2.0 200 OK NEWVENDOR-IP.5060 > KAMAILIO-IP.5060: ACK sip:number@KAMAILIO-IP:5

Re: [SR-Users] Redirect server for load balancing and HA

munication between natted endpoints you don't see any disadvantage of using Kamailio for LB+HA as Redirect server instead as proxy server? Thanks! Markus ___ SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list sr-users@lists.s

[SR-Users] Redirect server for load balancing and HA

+ users? Or b) doing some rewriting magic within Kamailio to deal with it? Or c) I'm overlooking a simple solution. Which one is it? :) 3) And the biggest question: Everywhere I read basically "Redirect server for LB + HA is not recommended, better use proxy". Is this still tr

Re: [SR-Users] NAT SIPPING in a FreeBSD jail

Am 21.02.2015 um 08:47 schrieb Euan Thoms: ** My question is: how do I force the ping behaviour in NAT SIPping feature? I need a trigger to further debug. Just an idea in general: Attach to the kamailio process(es) with strace with trace output to a file and the moment it crashes you should h

Re: [SR-Users] Getting started with Kamailio

tiny traffic that it will probably receive). I'll cut the rest of your answers as I have nothing to add. Just wanted to say a big thank you for the detailed answers! That helped. Regards Markus ___ SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (Ope

[SR-Users] Getting started with Kamailio

ause media and signaling were handled by a single Asterisk box with canreinvite=no everywhere. - Last question for now: why does it seem like important developers of SIP software such as Kamailio and yate are originating from Romania and are female? Just a coincidence? :-) Regards Markus _