> case HDR_CONTENTTYPE_T:
> case HDR_CONTENTDISPOSITION_T:
> case HDR_CONTENTLENGTH_T:
Cheers
Pascal
On Wed, May 12, 2010 at 5:41 PM, Iñaki Baz Castillo wrote:
> 2010/5/12 Pascal Maugeri :
>
> > It looks the Content-length within th
Hi
I got the following error when dealing with SIP INVITE with multi-part when
the client is behind NAT:
May 12 15:27:04 test /usr/sbin/kamailio[1792]: ERROR: nathelper
[nathelper.c:2954]: can't extract body from the message
The SIP INVITE message looks like:
INVITE sip:t...@test.net SIP/2.0
keep alive, then you have to tweak the
> kernel.
>
> regards
> Klaus
>
> Am 07.05.2010 16:20, schrieb Pascal Maugeri:
>
>> "kamailio" mailto:us...@lists.kamailio.org>>,
>>
>>
>> Hi
>>
>> I am sorry to ask again about this topic
alive. Tomorrow I will try
to make a couple a calls to see if I get this 408 you mentionned.
Is there a way (either with a parameter or changing source code) a to
control the frequency of TCP k.a. ?
Cheers
Pascal
2010/5/7 Henning Westerholt
> On Friday 07 May 2010, Pascal Mauge
"kamailio" ,
Hi
I am sorry to ask again about this topic but I don't understand yet how the
TCP keep-alive are sent.
With Kamailio 3.0.1 and the following configuration:
tcp_keepalive=yes
tcp_keepidle=10
tcp_connection_lifetime=3600
The TCP connection is kept alive and TCP Keep-Alive packets
Thank you, I really appreciate ! I will read that carefully.
FYI, we just did the test of sending the INVITE with transport=tcp in
contact header and it just works fine: kamailio sends the BYE over TCP.
Regards,
Pascal
On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 3:36 PM, Juha Heinanen wrote:
> Klaus Darilion writ
http://sip-router.org/docbook/sip-router/branch/master/modules_k/nathelper/nathelper.html#id2601711
>
> regards
> klaus
>
> Am 14.04.2010 12:06, schrieb Pascal Maugeri:
>
>> Hi
>>
>> I need some "guidelines" to troubleshoot the following issue:
>>
A more standard-conform way of rewriting the SDP is to use the
> add_contact_alias() and handle_ruri_alias() functions:
>
> http://sip-router.org/docbook/sip-router/branch/master/modules_k/nathelper/nathelper.html#id2601711
>
> regards
> klaus
>
> Am 14.04.2010 12:06, schr
; On 4/14/10 11:42 AM, Pascal Maugeri wrote:
>
> Hi Daniel
>
> Just to let you know I followed your advice and we deployed kamailio
> 3.0.1.
> We are still doing several tests, but I can say already we don't have
> anymroe errors with tcp connections ...
>
> ok, thanks for
Hi
I need some "guidelines" to troubleshoot the following issue:
a) A is behind NAT
b) B is not behind NAT
c) A calls B, SIP INVITE is sent over TCP
d) A's firewall does NAT and changes the source port to let's say p1
e) B releases the call and sends BYE over UDP
f) Kamailio sends the BYE to
>
>
> On 03/11/2010 05:58 PM, Iñaki Baz Castillo wrote:
>
>> 2010/3/11 Pascal Maugeri:
>>
>>
>>> Does such NOTIFY go to a TCP registered user? Of course if there is
>>>> not an existing TCP connection between Kamailio and the final
11 matches
Mail list logo
