Hi
I am using the topos module when bridging 2 networks with Kamailio.
The INVITE/200OK part of the transaction is working fine (i.e. the Contact
on both sides matches correctly the corresponding network).
However when the ACK is sent into Kamailio, instead of realising the next
hop is myself an
Hi
I am running Kamailio 4.4 and have come across a strange SBC which is
sending DTMF within the SDP body of a NOTIFY with a Content-Type
audio/telephone-event.
Has anybody come across this before?
The content itself comes through on a tcpdump/ngrep trace as four dots
"" and Kamailio puts an
_route (or sub-routes executed from there).
>
> Cheers,
> Daniel
>
> On 13/12/2016 13:16, Pete Kelly wrote:
>
> Spoke too soon there - it works for initial requests, but then
> subsequently does not work for invites. The function complains it is not
> being called from a request
Spoke too soon there - it works for initial requests, but then subsequently
does not work for invites. The function complains it is not being called
from a request route.
Any ideas?
On 12 December 2016 at 14:36, Pete Kelly wrote:
> Awesome, this looks to have done the trick nicely - thank
uot;);
> xlog("$avp(foo)");
>
> I believe, that should do the job.
>
> Thanks,
> Carsten
>
> 2016-12-09 16:17 GMT+01:00 Pete Kelly :
> > Hi
> >
> > I am using Kamailio 4.4. and calling the function sdp_remove_transport in
> > order to remove s
Hi
I am using Kamailio 4.4. and calling the function sdp_remove_transport in
order to remove some SRTP media lines.
The function works (of course!) however I would like to get access to the
modified SDP within the cfg.
I thought this would do the trick:
sdp_remove_transport("RTP/SAVP");
sdp_get
, so the port is no longer
> matched.
>
> My plan was to enable matching the ip:port based on a value stored in
> xavp_cfg, but got distracted by other tasks and forgot about it.
>
> Cheers,
> Daniel
>
>
> On 14/10/15 12:40, Pete Kelly wrote:
>
> Hi
>
> I am
Hi
I am trying to use the [client] directives in tls.cfg for the first time.
For my configuration I need to connect to 2 servers, both via TLS and both
using different certs.
I have defined an entry in tls.cfg like
[client:1.2.3.4:5061]
[client:5.6.7.8:5071]
and I also have an entry in dispatch
d.
Thanks for your help (and the websockets module), it is much appreciated.
>
> Regards,
>
> Peter
>
>
> On Thu, 2013-01-24 at 15:46 +, Pete Kelly wrote:
>
> This is the ruri:
>
> NOTIFY sips:pete@10.15.20.113:55536;rtcweb-breaker=no;transport=wss
&
e configuration file
> that is causing this. I suspect it may also be related to the use of the
> nathelper stuff and the contact aliasing that needs to be used with
> WebSocket (unless you are using the latest code and have configured
> outbound).
>
> Regards,
>
> Peter
>
have RSV1, RSV2, and RSV3, and the last nibble of
> the first byte will be the opcode.
>
> Regards,
>
> Peter
>
>
> On 24 Jan 2013, at 14:47, Pete Kelly wrote:
>
> Chrome 26, 24 and Firefox nightly all exhibit the same behaviour.
>
> I've decrypted the pac
fic with
> WireShark and importing the certificates into it so you can decode the
> packets. At that point you should be able to look at the binary of the
> frame and see if the compressed bit is set or not.
>
> Regards,
>
> Peter
>
>
> On Thu, 2013-01-24 at 13:45 +0
et/TLS interworking problem in Kamailio).
> I don't know anything about the Kamailio TLS implementation - I just drop
> WebSocket frames into it as required.
>
>
>
> I did do (a little) WSS testing and saw no problems myself.
>
>
>
> Regards,
>
>
&
Hi, I am having an issue at the moment with SIP NOTIFY messages being sent
from Kamailio (latest git master) over wss transport
I am getting reports from the receiving end saying "Compressed bit must be
0 if no negotiated deflate-frame extension"
The only reference I can find to it is at the foll
I see, I'll give it a try and check the result then. Thanks.
On 13 July 2011 16:43, Klaus Darilion wrote:
>
>
> Am 13.07.2011 16:56, schrieb Pete Kelly:
> > Hi
> >
> > I have been researching the topoh module which I understand is stateless
> > a
Hi
I have been researching the topoh module which I understand is stateless and
can persist across a server restart.
>From what I can gather it does this by adding some extra, encrypted headers
to the INVITE as it passes through the proxy- is this correct?
If so, can I ask how it handles situati
16 matches
Mail list logo
