Re: [SR-Users] Kamailio Presence help required.

"> terminated In above case the 201 device was Registered but its state is set as terminated. Same signal goes for offline users as well. Is this a standard reply or something is missing ? Thanks for your time Phil. Regards, Sammy On Tue, Mar 7, 2017 at 1:54 PM, Phil

Re: [SR-Users] Kamailio Presence help required.

t;, 1) modparam("pua_dialoginfo", "override_lifetime", 124) modparam("pua_reginfo|pua_usrloc", "default_domain", "voipguy.ca<http://voipguy.ca>") modparam("pua_reginfo", "server_address", "sip:REGINFO@ServerIP") mo

Re: [SR-Users] Kamailio Presence help required.

You should get an initial NOTIFY when you subscribe. Can you share the parts of your config that are relevant to presence/pua/etc.? From: sr-users [mailto:sr-users-boun...@lists.sip-router.org] On Behalf Of SamyGo Sent: 06 March 2017 15:50 To: Daniel-Constantin Mierla ;

Re: [SR-Users] use case

There's a page on the wiki documenting some common use cases. https://www.kamailio.org/wiki/tutorials/getting-started/main#typical_use_cases People use Kamailio for a lot of different things. I'd suggest looking at the videos for some of the past Kamailio World conferences - there's some very

Re: [SR-Users] nathelper - variable natping_interval per registration

i Phil, That feature currently does not exist. The nathelper module is dependent on a timer process. Keeping a timer for every registered user would be using quite some resources. Regards, Timmo On Tue, Dec 20, 2016 at 9:59 AM, Phil Lavin <phil.la...@cloudcall.com<mailto:phil.la...@c

[SR-Users] nathelper - variable natping_interval per registration

Hi all, Is it possible to set the natping_interval to a different value, per registration, at the time the user registers? For example, user A has 10 seconds and user B has 60 seconds. Thanks ___ SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) -

Re: [SR-Users] BYE issue

Is it not just the case that the vendor does not support loose routing? -Original Message- From: sr-users [mailto:sr-users-boun...@lists.sip-router.org] On Behalf Of Alex Balashov Sent: 18 October 2016 08:40 To: Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List

Re: [SR-Users] BYE issue

It sounds like the vendor is handling NAT traversal on their side. They will be assuming that Asterisk is behind NAT, because of the presence of private IP addresses – particularly in the contact, and will be rewriting various parts. They may be able to disable this for you – otherwise you’ll

Re: [SR-Users] Dialog sharing between Kamailio servers

What is the db_mode of the dialog module set to? I suggest trying 1 as a value. http://www.kamailio.org/docs/modules/4.4.x/modules/dialog.html#idp44282476 From: sr-users [mailto:sr-users-boun...@lists.sip-router.org] On Behalf Of Michael Jepson Sent: 26 September 2016 12:07 To: Kamailio (SER) -

Re: [SR-Users] memory problem

This looks like package memory. Can you dump the fragments and send the output? kamcmd pkg.stats This will show you memory usage, for each Kamailio process. kamcmd cfg.set_now_int core mem_dump_pkg PID kamcmd cfg.set_now_int core mem_dump_pkg 1 This will dump the memory fragments to syslog.

Re: [SR-Users] Location Table In db_mode 3

That is the case, however I don't believe this is a problem unless you have other databases on the same server that must be ACID compliant on the same server. Kamailio's DB data is mostly transient and that which isn't is not written at high volume (e.g. address table). -Original

Re: [SR-Users] Location Table In db_mode 3

<mailto:s...@sokhapkin.dyndns.org>> wrote: I'd avoid slow innodb engine for "temporary" frequently changing tables like location. Use MyISAM engine instead for the table. On Saturday 24 September 2016 19:37:22 Phil Lavin wrote: > Did you have a look at > innodb_flush_log_at_t

Re: [SR-Users] Location Table In db_mode 3

ng the table into memory is not a good option what is the best way to handle this situation? On Sat, Sep 24, 2016 at 10:50 PM, Phil Lavin <phil.la...@cloudcall.com<mailto:phil.la...@cloudcall.com>> wrote: You could look at tweaking MySQL setting innodb_flush_log_at_trx_commit<http

Re: [SR-Users] Location Table In db_mode 3

Also, what value do you have for MySQL parameter innodb_buffer_pool_size and how large is your MySQL data directory at peak? From: sr-users [mailto:sr-users-boun...@lists.sip-router.org] On Behalf Of Phil Lavin Sent: 24 September 2016 20:20 To: Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List <sr-us

Re: [SR-Users] Location Table In db_mode 3

oes not work with this rate. Maximum number of registrations that we can handle with db_mode 3 is 1000 per second. On Sat, Sep 24, 2016 at 10:12 PM, Phil Lavin <phil.la...@cloudcall.com<mailto:phil.la...@cloudcall.com>> wrote: What rate of registrations do you have? From: sr-users [mailto:sr

Re: [SR-Users] Location Table In db_mode 3

What rate of registrations do you have? From: sr-users [mailto:sr-users-boun...@lists.sip-router.org] On Behalf Of Gholamreza Sabery Sent: 24 September 2016 19:39 To: Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List Subject: [SR-Users] Location Table In db_mode 3 I have

Re: [SR-Users] OOM Errors

tember 2016 20:04 To: Phil Lavin <phil.la...@cloudcall.com<mailto:phil.la...@cloudcall.com>>; Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List <sr-users@lists.sip-router.org<mailto:sr-users@lists.sip-router.org>> Subject: Re: [SR-Users] OOM Errors Hello, yes, the db related allocate

Re: [SR-Users] OOM Errors

” but it’s probably worth fixing that one up too. Cheers From: Daniel-Constantin Mierla [mailto:mico...@gmail.com] Sent: 19 September 2016 20:04 To: Phil Lavin <phil.la...@cloudcall.com>; Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List <sr-users@lists.sip-router.org> Subject: Re: [SR-Users

Re: [SR-Users] OOM Errors

/phil-lavin/d2607a4eed36065e01ed42c43a0d27ad Do any of those stick out to you as being far higher than they should be? My feeling is that it’s related to the db_* stuff. Cheers From: sr-users [mailto:sr-users-boun...@lists.sip-router.org] On Behalf Of Phil Lavin Sent: 19 September 2016 18:15

Re: [SR-Users] OOM Errors

4.3 From: Daniel-Constantin Mierla [mailto:mico...@gmail.com] Sent: 19 September 2016 17:47 To: Phil Lavin <phil.la...@cloudcall.com>; Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List <sr-users@lists.sip-router.org> Subject: Re: [SR-Users] OOM Errors The rpc command is in 4.4, what version a

Re: [SR-Users] OOM Errors

/phil-lavin/27f63b472ace53dc956125a47d210bc9 for pkg memory stats output. When was corex.pkg_summary added? I’m getting not found error: error: 500 - command corex.pkg_summary not found From: sr-users [mailto:sr-users-boun...@lists.sip-router.org] On Behalf Of Phil Lavin Sent: 19 September

Re: [SR-Users] OOM Errors

he log messages. To troubleshoot, it is good to print the pkg summary, see: - https://www.kamailio.org/docs/modules/stable/modules/corex.html#corex.rpc.pkg_summary Then get the log messages from syslog printed by the command and send them over here. Cheers, Daniel On 19/09/16 14:02, Phil Lavin

[SR-Users] OOM Errors

Hi all, Kamailio stopped performing some functions earlier today, citing OOM errors. An excerpt from the log is below. SHM usage, at the time, looked fine. Also see below for that output. A restart of Kamailio resolved the issue. Is this SHM related or OS memory manager related?

Re: [SR-Users] Checking if a reply is part of a forked transaction

-users [mailto:sr-users-boun...@lists.sip-router.org] On Behalf Of Daniel Tryba Sent: 24 August 2016 17:46 To: Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List <sr-users@lists.sip-router.org> Subject: Re: [SR-Users] Checking if a reply is part of a forked transaction On Wed, Aug 24, 2016 at 03:36:16PM +

[SR-Users] Checking if a reply is part of a forked transaction

We need to check if a 1XX reply is part of an INVITE transaction that was forked to 2 or more phones. We figure that we can do a location lookup, based on the to header of the 1XX... but is there a better way? Phil ___ SIP Express Router (SER) and

Re: [SR-Users] Kamailio presence

I've done quite a bit with Kamailio BLF recently. I have a Yealink T41P on my desk here - I'll give it a whirl. -Original Message- From: sr-users [mailto:sr-users-boun...@lists.sip-router.org] On Behalf Of Bill Sent: 02 August 2016 01:07 To: sr-users@lists.sip-router.org Subject:

Re: [SR-Users] Kamailio presence

ua_dialoginfo", "send_publish_flag", FLT_DLGINFO) modparam("pua_dialoginfo", "override_lifetime", 14420) # PortaOne max call time (4 hours) plus a little modparam("pua_dialoginfo", "callee_trying", 1) # Implemented by Phil - submitted upstream to v4.

Re: [SR-Users] Kamailio presence

I've done quite a bit with Kamailio BLF recently. I have a Yealink T41P on my desk here - I'll give it a whirl. -Original Message- From: Phil Lavin Sent: 02 August 2016 10:26 To: Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List <sr-users@lists.sip-router.org> Subject: RE: [SR-Users] Ka

Re: [SR-Users] HTTP query at the end of a phone call

That depends on when you want to trigger the notification. The easiest thing to do would be to trigger it when one party sends a BYE. The best place to do this would probably be after you have relayed the BYE to the UA (in the RELAY route after the t_relay() call). This seems most logical as

Re: [SR-Users] Kamailio + ToS

This was asked on the mailing list earlier in the day yesterday. I’m presuming you only just subscribed. See this topic on the archive for info - http://lists.sip-router.org/pipermail/sr-users/2016-June/093348.html Phil From: sr-users [mailto:sr-users-boun...@lists.sip-router.org] On Behalf Of

Re: [SR-Users] Sequential calls messes up presence with pua-dialog info

... Though I doubt it will help here. Give the config I provided a try – that will probably solve your problems. Phil Lavin Telecoms Systems Manager CloudCall by SYNETY www.cloudcall.com<http://www.cloudcall.com/> T: +44 (0) 330 335 / +1 617 982 1600 D: +44 (0) 116 424 4790 / +1 716 242 6

Re: [SR-Users] Sequential calls messes up presence with pua-dialog info

ram("pua", "update_period", 20) modparam("pua", "outbound_proxy", MY_SIP_URL) # - pua_dialoginfo params - modparam("pua_dialoginfo", "send_publish_flag", FLT_DLGINFO) modparam("pua_dialoginfo", "override_lifetime"

Re: [SR-Users] Setting source interface on relay

in the dialog and thus traffic across a stateful network (e.g. to a NAT phone) is broken. Cheers Phil Lavin Telecoms Systems Manager CloudCall by SYNETY www.cloudcall.com<http://www.cloudcall.com/> T: +44 (0) 330 335 / +1 617 982 1600 D: +44 (0) 116 424 4790 / +1 716 242 6604 SM: LinkedIn

Re: [SR-Users] Setting source interface on relay

Thanks, Dimitry. That's done it. Clearly my Google foo is bad today. Phil Lavin Telecoms Systems Manager CloudCall by SYNETY www.cloudcall.com<http://www.cloudcall.com/> T: +44 (0) 330 335 / +1 617 982 1600 D: +44 (0) 116 424 4790 / +1 716 242 6604 SM: LinkedIn<https://uk.linkedi

[SR-Users] Setting source interface on relay

} Is there a way to explicitly set the source interface to relay on? Thanks Phil Lavin Telecoms Systems Manager CloudCall by SYNETY www.cloudcall.com<http://www.cloudcall.com/> T: +44 (0) 330 335 / +1 617 982 1600 D: +44 (0) 116 424 4790 / +1 716 242 6604 SM: LinkedIn<https://u

Re: [SR-Users] Kamailio TLS and SIP-Package building

I'd think you'd also need to enable TCP in order to use TLS. You explicitly disable TCP. From: sr-users [mailto:sr-users-boun...@lists.sip-router.org] On Behalf Of Nagorny, Dimitry Sent: 13 April 2016 14:56 To: sr-users@lists.sip-router.org Subject: [SR-Users] Kamailio TLS and SIP-Package

Re: [SR-Users] sdp_remove_line_by_prefix

org> Subject: Re: [SR-Users] sdp_remove_line_by_prefix It seems does not work. Just add at the end s= and s=Asterisk PBX is still there :) Thanks anyway for the tip 2016-02-24 15:05 GMT+01:00 Phil Lavin <phil.la...@synety.com<mailto:phil.la...@synety.com>>: Try replace_body() rep

Re: [SR-Users] sdp_remove_line_by_prefix

Try replace_body() replacing “s=Asterisk” with “s=” From: sr-users [mailto:sr-users-boun...@lists.sip-router.org] On Behalf Of Alberto Sagredo Sent: 24 February 2016 14:03 To: Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List Subject: Re: [SR-Users] sdp_remove_line_by_prefix

Re: [SR-Users] BLF on different IPs/domains

de sip headers. Cheers, Daniel On 19/01/16 19:17, Phil Lavin wrote: Hi all, A different BLF query to my other one so creating another thread. We've tried to have a BLF client SUBSCRIBE using a secondary IP on Kamailio. It is not sent a NOTIFY, but a client which has done a SUBSCRIBE using the p

Re: [SR-Users] BLF on different IPs/domains

I've done some more digging and actually the below issue is not the cause of the problem. I'll open a new thread to discuss the actual problem as it's not related to the below. Cheers From: sr-users [mailto:sr-users-boun...@lists.sip-router.org] On Behalf Of Phil Lavin Sent: 12 February 2016

[SR-Users] Negative return codes from functions

Hi all, Just a sanity check, really. Does Kamailio consider negative response codes to be false? For example, should the following log execute? if (!foo()) { # Returns -2 x_log("Foo is false"); } The reason for asking here is that I'm implementing flood protection using pike, based off

Re: [SR-Users] Negative return codes from functions

11/02/16 13:41, Phil Lavin wrote: Hi all, Just a sanity check, really. Does Kamailio consider negative response codes to be false? For example, should the following log execute? if (!foo()) { # Returns -2 x_log("Foo is false"); } The reason for asking here is that I'm im

Re: [SR-Users] Negative return codes from functions

Just tried this again and it does actually work as expected. No idea what I was doing incorrectly before. Cheers From: sr-users [mailto:sr-users-boun...@lists.sip-router.org] On Behalf Of Phil Lavin Sent: 11 February 2016 15:34 To: mico...@gmail.com; Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List <

Re: [SR-Users] Need to validate a IP address with subnet mask

ddress with subnet mask Hello, for sake of completion, using the src_ip keyword works with network addresses: if(src_ip==1.2.3.0/24) Cheers, Daniel On 10/02/16 08:39, Sunil More wrote: Hey Phil, Thank you for the input , this helps. Thanking You, Sunil More On Wed, Feb 10, 2016 at 12:40 PM

Re: [SR-Users] rfc: kamailio.cfg polishing for v4.4

. The only other thing to discuss is the features it provides. Perhaps things like voicemail convolute it a little more than necessary. That said, it's easy to disable and/or remove. Cheers Phil Lavin Telecoms Systems Manager CloudCall by SYNETY www.cloudcall.com T: +44 (0) 330 335 / +1

Re: [SR-Users] Need to validate a IP address with subnet mask

2 ways: · is_in_subnet() - http://www.kamailio.org/docs/modules/3.4.x/modules/ipops.html#idp42416 · Add the IP and mask to the address table and use allow_source_address() - http://kamailio.org/docs/modules/3.1.x/modules_k/permissions.html#id2528610 Phil From: sr-users

Re: [SR-Users] Freezing the development for next major version 4.4

Hi Daniel, There's an outstanding crash bug fix on GitHub submitted last week - https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/pull/492. This is also present in 4.3 and probably earlier releases. It'd be helpful for us if this could be merged to master and I will sort the backports separately. Cheers

Re: [SR-Users] Kamailio/How to send all requests ?

If indeed you mean ALL traffic, including traffic that Kamailio itself can route internally: Add something to the LOCATION route to only allow usrloc based routing from the media server. In my case, I have added this at the top: # Only do this for things authorized by IP # UAs need to go via

Re: [SR-Users] Kamailio v4.3 and Freeswitch Stable Latest

than digetics in Kamailio Wiki. (I installed Kamailio latest stable from Deb Jessie repos) After that, I applied these are: http://kb.asipto.com/freeswitch:kamailio-3.1.x-freeswitch-1.0.6d-sbc and I adapted to Kamailio 4.3 (at least I tried) There is nothing to different from this link. So,

Re: [SR-Users] Kamailio v4.3 and Freeswitch Stable Latest

You'll need to share your Kamailio config and some details of your network setup (specifically if NAT is involved). Phil -Original Message- From: sr-users [mailto:sr-users-boun...@lists.sip-router.org] On Behalf Of Baris Sekerciler Sent: 29 January 2016 08:35 To:

Re: [SR-Users] kamailio 4.4 writes wrong expires parameter at the database

What is the expiry in the reply from Kamailio to the registration? What is the value you have set for registrar module max_expires param? Phil From: sr-users [mailto:sr-users-boun...@lists.sip-router.org] On Behalf Of Yuriy Gorlichenko Sent: 27 January 2016 16:59 To: Kamailio (SER) - Users

Re: [SR-Users] Strange PUA Behaviour

uot;, DBURL) modparam("pua", "db_mode", 0) modparam("pua", "update_period", 20) modparam("pua", "dlginfo_increase_version", 0) modparam("pua", "reginfo_increase_version", 0) # - pua_dialoginfo params ----- modparam(&

Re: [SR-Users] Strange PUA Behaviour

me to a high value negates the need for the refreshes to happen. Cheers Phil From: Daniel-Constantin Mierla [mailto:mico...@gmail.com] Sent: 26 January 2016 11:36 To: Phil Lavin <phil.la...@synety.com>; Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List <sr-users@lists.sip-router.org> Cc: Telco Tea

Re: [SR-Users] Acc message to syslog

Hi, The log_facility for acc is LOG_DAEMON by default - http://www.kamailio.org/docs/modules/4.3.x/modules/acc.html#acc.p.log_facility I have changed it to LOCAL1: modparam("acc", "log_facility", "LOG_LOCAL1") And have the main logs as LOCAL0: log_facility=LOG_LOCAL0 This is then

Re: [SR-Users] Strange PUA Behaviour

It does it when the value is taken from override_lifetime, if that's what you mean. The override_lifetime value has been set sufficiently high such that a refresh is not required because calls on our platform cannot last more than 4 hours. Phil Lavin Telecoms Systems Manager CloudCall

Re: [SR-Users] Strange PUA Behaviour

Hi Daniel, Any thoughts on this? Thanks Phil Lavin Telecoms Systems Manager CloudCall by SYNETY www.cloudcall.com<http://www.cloudcall.com/> T: +44 (0) 330 335 / +1 617 982 1600 D: +44 (0) 116 424 4790 / +1 617 982 4790 SM: LinkedIn<https://uk.linkedin.com/pub/phil-lavin/25/422/

Re: [SR-Users] Kamailio and openLDAP integration.

Are you using Kamailio’s usrloc module? If so, at what point do you save(‘location’)? From: sr-users [mailto:sr-users-boun...@lists.sip-router.org] On Behalf Of Safdar Khan Sent: 21 January 2016 12:24 To: Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List Subject: [SR-Users]

Re: [SR-Users] Strange PUA Behaviour

.com] Sent: 19 January 2016 23:26 To: Phil Lavin <phil.la...@synety.com>; Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List <sr-users@lists.sip-router.org> Subject: Re: [SR-Users] Strange PUA Behaviour Can you get a pcap for a case with the new config? Being traveling, but maybe I get a chance to

Re: [SR-Users] Strange PUA Behaviour

;9989". This does not create 2 records in the dialogs table and the BLF functionality works as expected. What do you propose as the correct fix for this situation? Thanks Phil From: Phil Lavin Sent: 19 January 2016 09:42 To: 'mico...@gmail.com' <mico...@gmail.com>; Kamailio (SER) - Use

Re: [SR-Users] Strange PUA Behaviour

t;db_mode", 2) modparam("pua", "update_period", 20) modparam("pua_dialoginfo", "send_publish_flag", FLT_DLGINFO) modparam("pua_dialoginfo", "override_lifetime", 124) Thanks Phil From: Daniel-Constantin Mierla [mailto:mico...@gmail.

[SR-Users] BLF on different IPs/domains

Hi all, A different BLF query to my other one so creating another thread. We've tried to have a BLF client SUBSCRIBE using a secondary IP on Kamailio. It is not sent a NOTIFY, but a client which has done a SUBSCRIBE using the primary IP is. If we route the problematic client such that it

Re: [SR-Users] Strange PUA Behaviour

etag: a.1453224139.18800.126.0 tuple_id: watcher_uri: call_id: to_tag: from_tag: cseq: 0 record_route: contact: remote_contact: version: 0 extra_headers: 5 rows in set (0.00 sec) Phil Lavin Telecoms Systems Manager Clo

Re: [SR-Users] Strange PUA Behaviour

", 1) modparam("pua", "db_url", DBURL) modparam("pua", "db_mode", 2) modparam("pua", "update_period", 20) modparam("pua_dialoginfo", "send_publish_flag", FLT_DLGINFO) modparam("pua_dialoginfo", "o

[SR-Users] Strange PUA Behaviour

hone to continue flashing. We are running a version of Kamailio compiled from the HEAD of the current 4.3 branch. Any ideas? Phil Lavin Telecoms Systems Manager CloudCall by SYNETY www.cloudcall.com<http://www.cloudcall.com/> T: +44 (0) 330 335 / +1 617 982 1600 D: +44 (0) 116 424 4790

Re: [SR-Users] Example kamailio.cfg t_check_trans()

ubject: Re: [SR-Users] Example kamailio.cfg t_check_trans() Hello, On 31/12/15 12:39, Phil Lavin wrote: Hi there, The example config that Kamailio ships with contains this block of code in request_route: # handle retransmissions if(t_precheck_trans()) { t_check_trans(); exit; } t_check

[SR-Users] Example kamailio.cfg t_check_trans()

as I can see from the documentation, t_check_trans() returns a boolean value and does not modify any data internally. Can anyone help me find out what the relevance of the t_check_trans() calls is? Thanks Phil Lavin Systems Engineer CloudCall by SYNETY www.cloudcall.com<h