Hi Daniel,
Not exactly a list, and I believe Carsten got you covered ( can get you
another if needed, just ping me ) but have you looked into libphonenumber ?
Seems quite maintained and could be helpful:
https://github.com/googlei18n/libphonenumber/tree/master/resources
Best,
Tristan.
On 01/18
dp?
>
> If you run with debug=3, do you get any other hints about what happens
> there? Also, you can use debugger module with cfgtrace enabled to see
> what actions are executed.
>
> Cheers,
> Daniel
>
> On 20/05/15 00:31, Tristan Mahé wrote:
>> Hi fellow
You're dealing with the signalisation, introducing a webapp driven
configuration can lead to some nice timeout/response time issues left to
investigate, or create an additional spof...
Regarding your example of offering a kamailio hosting service, or
dedicated proxies, I would do the absolute oppo
Chef, Ansible, Puppet, and others, their job is exactly that, ensuring
that nodes are configured accordingly, also ensuring that any operation
needed for that configuration change is applied ( reloading dispatcher
in case of new config, restarting kamailio in case the whole config file
changed, ...
Hello Sebastien,
This won't answer your question, but I would rather use an sbc (
freeswitch, yate, asterisk, ...) to deal with the routing logic,
especially if you
want to leave some room for the future ( like transcoding, retrying a
call to a different carrier, ... ).
Kamailio can then be used a
e a good value? This would
> be something easy.
>
> If someone wants to make a patch to set the size, that's even better.
>
> Cheers,
> Daniel
>
> On 04/11/15 00:08, Tristan Mahé wrote:
>> Hi Sven,
>>
>> log_prefix seems to be defined in dprint.c and max
Hi Sven,
log_prefix seems to be defined in dprint.c and maximum size is 128:
#define LOG_PREFIX_SIZE 128
static char log_prefix_buf[LOG_PREFIX_SIZE];
So recompiling with a bigger size could certainly help.
Daniel, could we set the default higher for next releases or provide a
way to increase it
not necessary on 3.3, but it is with 4.2+.
Anyway, we are now satisfied with the performance, but any small new
gain is always good to get :)
Best,
Tristan.
On 11/03/2015 01:50 AM, Daniel-Constantin Mierla wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On 21/10/15 00:37, Tristan Mahé wrote:
>> Hi Daniel,
&g
217/192815/25982.783158]
Let me try to pinpoint better now what is the difference here.
PS: I sent you a private mail about this, in case you have time :)
On 10/20/2015 11:38 AM, Tristan Mahé wrote:
> Hi Daniel,
>
> I am doing that right now, thank you.
>
> I will keep you posted as told on
d something relevant, I can't
> imagine what would create this handling issue between the versions.
>
> Cheers,
> Daniel
>
> On 15/10/15 07:29, Tristan Mahé wrote:
>> Hi Daniel,
>>
>> It is on the exact same server, same system configuration, same
>>
, besides sni, which should not have any relevant
> impact as described here.
>
> Also, have you installed from git branch 4.2 or the tarball/packages
> of 4.2.6?
>
> Cheers,
> Daniel
>
> On 15/10/15 03:36, Tristan Mahé wrote:
>> Hi List,
>>
>> I'
Hi List,
I've been reaching a strange thing lately, trying to upgrade to kamailio
4.2.6 ( identical config ):
- 35% loss of performance on TLS connections ( Sipp REGISTER scenario,
easily reproduced ).
- more TCP workers needed to ease the TCP queues ( 32 workers on 3.3.7,
at least 64 are needed
Hi fellow kamailio users,
I'm playing actually with t_on_branch_failure, in a simultaneous forking
scenario ( lookup("location") returns multiple contacts ).
Any idea on how to get those "on_branch_failure" working ?
Thanks in Advance !
* Test by putting failure_exec_mode:
- at 1 => no branch f
Le 12/02/2015 13:08, Andrey Utkin a écrit :
> 2015-02-12 22:33 GMT+02:00 Tristan Mahé :
>> Hi,
>>
>> bad checksum may be caused by the virtual network adapter that does not
>> perform hardware checksum. I had this issue on a kvm test setup.
>>
>> MTU is
Hi,
bad checksum may be caused by the virtual network adapter that does not
perform hardware checksum. I had this issue on a kvm test setup.
MTU is to be looked at, as udp does not handle very well packet
fragmentation ( to say the least ). Could you reproduce the same issue
using an openvpn tcp
Hi Rahul,
Don't take me wrong, but you still have some homework to do. Apache is
not a requirement for webrtc ( apart hosting the website ). The only
difference between using http and https is that by default on http, most
browsers will always ask for the user to confirm usage of the mic/cam.
WS
Hi Rahul,
Check your record-route, it should not be static. ( maybe use
advertised_address and allow double record-route for rr module ).
My 2 cents.
Le 26/01/2015 11:21, Rahul MathuR a écrit :
> Hello,
>
> I am totally struck at a point while implementing Kamailio as proxy
> for WebRTC enabled
Seems like pike is activated ( antiflood ), check your config !
My 2 cents...
Le 29/09/2014 09:55, Yuriy Gorlichenko a écrit :
> Hi. I tested with sipp my system. With asterisk sipp gets more than 500
> calls, with kamailio 68 at maximum with same settings.
>
> What I did:
>
> run sipp though k
Hi guys,
I'm having some crashs on a simple REGISTRAR, in st_delete_ucontact.
It happens daily, mostly when proxy is loaded. Saw that someone got the
same problem via this pastebin: http://pastebin.com/GsMtav7A.
Does someone got an idea of why it's failing or a workaround or a fix to
share ?
He
Hi guys,
I was debugging an install on kamailio 3.0, and was asked to add per
user custom outbound proxies.
To do so, I used load_credentials from auth_db to store the custom route
in an avp, as you can see in the relevant part below.
I noticed a strange thing, POINT 1 show "OK", but POINT
Hi List,
I'm writing a little message because I encountered today a strange error
on my Kamailio 3.0 proxy/presence server ( and can't ask on IRC there's
nobody atm ;p )
I get these errors in the logs since a few hours:
Apr 23 14:31:41 proxy-b /proxy/bin/kamailio/sbin/kamailio[29008]: ERROR:
21 matches
Mail list logo
