Hello,
On 4/5/11 2:33 PM, marius zbihlei wrote:
On 04/05/2011 03:19 PM, Daniel-Constantin Mierla wrote:
Hello,
I should have said it from the beginning that this project is
practically just a proposal for the moment, the idea started at FOSDEM
this year while talking with the folks at Jitsi pr
On 04/05/2011 03:19 PM, Daniel-Constantin Mierla wrote:
Hello,
I should have said it from the beginning that this project is
practically just a proposal for the moment, the idea started at FOSDEM
this year while talking with the folks at Jitsi project and we thought
sip-to-jingle gw might work o
Hello,
I should have said it from the beginning that this project is
practically just a proposal for the moment, the idea started at FOSDEM
this year while talking with the folks at Jitsi project and we thought
sip-to-jingle gw might work only with signaling conversion.
We have one slot for
> 2011/3/28 Schumann Sebastian :
> >> You are right, sorry. Anyhow, how you ever seen a XMPP server
> >> integrating some kind of interoperability/gateway with SIP? In
> >> Kamailio/*SER we have some attemps to interoperate with XMPP world.
> >
> > Openfire has SIP SIMPLE support.
>
> What compone
2011/3/28 Schumann Sebastian :
>> You are right, sorry. Anyhow, how you ever seen a XMPP server
>> integrating some kind of interoperability/gateway with SIP? In
>> Kamailio/*SER we have some attemps to interoperate with XMPP world.
>
> Openfire has SIP SIMPLE support.
What components of SIP SIMPL
> You are right, sorry. Anyhow, how you ever seen a XMPP server
> integrating some kind of interoperability/gateway with SIP? In
> Kamailio/*SER we have some attemps to interoperate with XMPP world.
Openfire has SIP SIMPLE support.
Sebastian
___
SIP Expr
Iñaki Baz Castillo wrote:
>
> Anyhow, how you ever seen a XMPP server
> integrating some kind of interoperability/gateway with SIP? In
> Kamailio/*SER we have some attemps to interoperate with XMPP world.
Not quite sure what you are getting at. What does it matter whether the
SIP server is also an
Iñaki Baz Castillo writes:
> I don't think so. GoogleTalk is XMPP and uses Jingle for voice.
> Maybe you meant GoogleVoice (https://www.google.com/voice/) which is a
> PSTN service in which Google uses SIP internally.
yes, sorry, i meant googlevoice. so i read somewhere that now
googlevoice users
2011/3/28 Martin Hoffmann :
>> Anyhow, how you ever seen a XMPP server
>> integrating some kind of interoperability/gateway with SIP? In
>> Kamailio/*SER we have some attemps to interoperate with XMPP world.
>
> Not quite sure what you are getting at. What does it matter whether the
> SIP server is
2011/3/28 Olle E. Johansson :
>> Let me a question: Why SIP people is interested in interoperate with
>> XMPP while the opposite is not true?
> Inaki. Do google before stating things like this ;-)
>
> THe XMPP people have written drafts about SIP XMPP interoperability but have
> gotten almost no r
28 mar 2011 kl. 11.29 skrev Iñaki Baz Castillo:
> 2011/3/28 Daniel-Constantin Mierla :
>> the proposal is to implement a signaling gateway between SIP and JINGLE to
>> enable voice calls between the two networks
>
> Let me a question: Why SIP people is interested in interoperate with
> XMPP whil
2011/3/28 Daniel-Constantin Mierla :
> the proposal is to implement a signaling gateway between SIP and JINGLE to
> enable voice calls between the two networks
Let me a question: Why SIP people is interested in interoperate with
XMPP while the opposite is not true?
We have also tried to build IM/p
2011/3/28 Juha Heinanen :
> i read somewhere that googletalk now supports sip
I don't think so. GoogleTalk is XMPP and uses Jingle for voice.
Maybe you meant GoogleVoice (https://www.google.com/voice/) which is a
PSTN service in which Google uses SIP internally.
> how is jingle related to google
13 matches
Mail list logo
