Thank's Klaus,
I will re-open the bug report, I don't know what changes to fix the bug
FS247...
Best Regards
2013/1/7 Klaus Darilion klaus.mailingli...@pernau.at
Then it seems that this fix and is not related to your bug FS247. You
should re-open the bug report.
regards
Klaus
On
Then it seems that this fix and is not related to your bug FS247. You
should re-open the bug report.
regards
Klaus
On 03.01.2013 17:21, Bruno Bresciani wrote:
My openSSL version is 0.9.8... According to
Thank's for your reply Klaus,
but I don't know if is exactly this patch that Daniel is referring, because
the backtrace full with gdb showed that problem happened at ser_realloc
function. I will insert this check to NULL pointer at ser_free and
ser_realloc function and recompile kamailio 3.1.2
You can also check which openSSL version you are using. According to
http://openssl.6102.n7.nabble.com/Custom-free-routine-is-invoked-with-NULL-argument-in-openssl-1-0-1-td25937.html
it happened somewhere between 1.0.0. and 1.0.1c
regards
klaus
On 03.01.2013 14:56, Bruno Bresciani wrote:
My openSSL version is 0.9.8... According to
http://openssl.6102.n7.nabble.com/Custom-free-routine-is-invoked-with-NULL-argument-in-openssl-1-0-1-td25937.htmlthis
was working fine in 0.9.8.
I was analysing the backtrace full with gdb and the line below shows that
ptr was not a NULL parameter.
#4
I think Daniel is referring to this patch:
http://git.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/gitweb.cgi/sip-router/?a=commit;h=020acff35f8e9dfa62aba8678a781a0f7bbb110b
This fix was done to devel and 3.3 branch and is included in latest
3.3.3 release.
regards
Klaus
Am 20.12.2012 19:29, schrieb Bruno
Hello Daniel,
What patch this bug was fixed? This bug was open in 30 July 2012 and
ultimate Release to 3.1.X (3.1.6) was released at 14 July 2012...
Best Regards
2012/8/1 Daniel-Constantin Mierla mico...@gmail.com
Hello,
On 7/31/12 3:39 PM, Bruno Bresciani wrote:
Hello,
I didn't
Hello,
if you refer to free(0) issue with libssl, I am not sure it was ever put
in 3.1 branch, as the last release was before reporting the issue.
Cheers,
Daniel
On 12/20/12 6:01 PM, Bruno Bresciani wrote:
Hello Daniel,
What patch this bug was fixed? This bug was open in 30 July 2012 and
Hi,
I refer the bug fix FS#247 that I open in 30 July 2012 and you closed in
25 october 2012 with the information: Reopen if the patch for free(0)
didn't work..
What Release this fix was included?
Best Regards
2012/12/20 Daniel-Constantin Mierla mico...@gmail.com
Hello,
if you refer to
Hello,
On 7/31/12 3:39 PM, Bruno Bresciani wrote:
Hello,
I didn't know that log messages related to memory operations can be
controlled by global parameter, but I like to know if is recommendable
I recompile kamailio using q_malloc (default) and not f_malloc...
memory operations using
Hello,
it is in my to-do list to investigate, so far I was not able to reproduce.
Vacation time together with other travelings makes a bit more slower
process. Please add it also to the tracker:
http://sip-router.org/tracker/
A minor release for 3.3 branch is going to be soon, being there
Hi,
Bellow is output of 'kamailio -V'...
--
version: kamailio 3.1.2 (i386/linux) 4d9f90
flags: STATS: Off, USE_IPV6, USE_TCP, USE_TLS, TLS_HOOKS, USE_RAW_SOCKS,
DISABLE_NAGLE,
Hi Users,
This is my ultimate try to ask for some help to debug the two cores
generated by fm_realloc() function. If somebody can give me a feedback
about my questions or doubts I will be very grateful, this user list of
kamailio always help me to solve my problems.
Best Regards
2012/7/23
Hi All,
I imagine that this core doesn't easy to replicate but somebody can help
me to understand why it was generated? There is some way to prevent it?
Best Regards
2012/7/18 Renan Capaverde renan.capave...@digitro.com.br
I am having the same problem on kamailio 3.1.6. Someone please
I am having the same problem on kamailio 3.1.6. Someone please help.
Cheers,
Renan
Em 17/7/2012 14:26, Bruno Bresciani escreveu:
Excuse-me Daniel, I forgot this information... Kamailio version 3.1.2
Best Regards
2012/7/17 Daniel-Constantin Mierla mico...@gmail.com
mailto:mico...@gmail.com
Hi all,
I observed two at 0x08173bf0 in fm_realloc (qm=0xb5f7d000, p=0xb61f0bc0,
size=0) at mem/f_malloc.c:536.
I don't know exactly what may be caused this core because the debug of
kamailio is disabled, but looking at backtrace (gdb) and source code I
could notice a relationship with TLS
Hello,
send also the version 'kamailio -V' to match the proper sources.
Cheers,
Daniel
On 7/17/12 7:11 PM, Bruno Bresciani wrote:
Hi all,
I observed two at 0x08173bf0 in fm_realloc (qm=0xb5f7d000,
p=0xb61f0bc0, size=0) at mem/f_malloc.c:536.
I don't know exactly what may be caused this
Excuse-me Daniel, I forgot this information... Kamailio version 3.1.2
Best Regards
2012/7/17 Daniel-Constantin Mierla mico...@gmail.com
Hello,
send also the version 'kamailio -V' to match the proper sources.
Cheers,
Daniel
On 7/17/12 7:11 PM, Bruno Bresciani wrote:
Hi all,
I
18 matches
Mail list logo
