Re: [SR-Users] Dispatcher Confusion Redeux

2011-10-20 Thread Daniel-Constantin Mierla
Hello, On 10/20/11 1:13 PM, Bruce McAlister wrote: Thanks Daniel, I will try 3.2.0 shortly. Just another quick question, I have the following failure route defined for dispatcher: if (t_branch_timeout()&& !t_branch_replied()) { xlog("route[TO_SBC] : $rm : timeout and

Re: [SR-Users] Dispatcher Confusion Redeux

2011-10-20 Thread Bruce McAlister
Thanks Daniel, I will try 3.2.0 shortly. Just another quick question, I have the following failure route defined for dispatcher: if (t_branch_timeout() && !t_branch_replied()) { xlog("route[TO_SBC] : $rm : timeout and no reply ($si:$sp->$Ri:$Rp->$du)\n"); x

Re: [SR-Users] Dispatcher Confusion Redeux

2011-10-20 Thread Daniel-Constantin Mierla
Hello, I haven't read the archive, but you probably talk about what I am thinking of. IIRC, at that time Carsten tried to explain how it works, but overall looked confused indeed. As a result, dispatcher module in 3.2.0 has a different system for gateway states. There are three of them: - ac

[SR-Users] Dispatcher Confusion Redeux

2011-10-19 Thread Asgaroth
Hi All, I'd like to clear something up with the diapatcher module and it's probing parameters: First things first: ./kamailio -V version: kamailio 3.1.5 (i386/linux) 76fff5 flags: STATS: Off, USE_IPV6, USE_TCP, USE_TLS, TLS_HOOKS, USE_RAW_SOCKS, DISABLE_NAGLE, USE_MCAST, DNS_IP_HACK, SHM_MEM, SH