Re: [SR-Users] Increase diversion counter

2016-07-05 Thread Igor Potjevlesch
Good idea. Tested and it works. Thank you! Regards, Igor. -Message d'origine- De : sr-users [mailto:sr-users-boun...@lists.sip-router.org] De la part de Juha Heinanen Envoyé : lundi 4 juillet 2016 20:38 À : Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List Objet : Re: [SR-Users] Increase dive

Re: [SR-Users] Increase diversion counter

2016-07-04 Thread Juha Heinanen
Igor Potjevlesch writes: > I was thinking to increase it and put the value in the parameter of the > module like: > modparam("diversion", "suffix", ";privacy=off;$dic") > > But it doesn't work like this. > > So, I guess I can put this value in a variable, increase the variable > and use textop

Re: [SR-Users] Increase diversion counter

2016-07-04 Thread Igor Potjevlesch
ailio (SER) - Users Mailing List Objet : Re: [SR-Users] Increase diversion counter Daniel-Constantin Mierla writes: > look at the textopsx module -- there are some functions to get/set > parameters from/to sip headers. see http://www.kamailio.org/wiki/cookbooks/devel/pseudovariab

Re: [SR-Users] Increase diversion counter

2016-07-04 Thread Juha Heinanen
Daniel-Constantin Mierla writes: > look at the textopsx module -- there are some functions to get/set > parameters from/to sip headers. see http://www.kamailio.org/wiki/cookbooks/devel/pseudovariables#dic_-_diversion_counter_parameter -- juha ___ SIP

Re: [SR-Users] Increase diversion counter

2016-07-04 Thread Daniel-Constantin Mierla
Hello, look at the textopsx module -- there are some functions to get/set parameters from/to sip headers. Another option is to play with transformations to extract the value, increase it, then use subst_hf() to replace it (or remove old header and add a new one built based on the old one). Cheer

[SR-Users] Increase diversion counter

2016-07-04 Thread Igor Potjevlesch
Hello, I'm looking for the best way to increase the Diversion counter. If my Kamailio is the first to generate a call forward I can manage this with static value into suffix params. But, if the Diversion counter is already set, I don't see how to handle this properly. Someone has already w