Re: [SR-Users] Kamailio Behind TCP Load Balancer

2016-06-23 Thread Daniel-Constantin Mierla
Hello, On 23/06/16 12:57, Colin Morelli wrote: > Hi Daniel, > > Yes it is actually terminating and opening a new connection. > > I don't need HAProxy for anything at the moment, I was mentioning it > for its support of the proxy protocol which enables applications to > get source address informat

Re: [SR-Users] Kamailio Behind TCP Load Balancer

2016-06-23 Thread Colin Morelli
Hi Daniel, Yes it is actually terminating and opening a new connection. I don't need HAProxy for anything at the moment, I was mentioning it for its support of the proxy protocol which enables applications to get source address information behind TCP load balancers. I'm not so much worried about

Re: [SR-Users] Kamailio Behind TCP Load Balancer

2016-06-22 Thread Daniel-Constantin Mierla
Hello, is the tcp load balancer changing the source address, like accepting the connection from the phone and then opening one to kamailio? Do you need haproxy because of other reasons or only for sip? A kamailio load balancer (sip aware) is also quite fast. Cheers, Daniel On 23/06/16 04:32, C

[SR-Users] Kamailio Behind TCP Load Balancer

2016-06-22 Thread Colin Morelli
Hey all, I'm looking to put Kamailio behind a TCP load balancer that is SIP-unaware. My application is deployed in AWS and I'm tying to place Kamailio behind an ELB. For the most part, everything is fine. For my specific implementation I'm disabling UDP as a signaling transport and using only TLS