On Aug 27, 2014, at 5:48 AM, Eugene Prokopiev wrote:
>>> Have SEMS any advantages over FreeSWITCH for topology hiding?
>>
>> More narrow and specialised use-cases, so you don't have to deal with
>> stripping it of PBX and miscellaneous application features. It's more of a
>> dedicated B2BUA (wi
>> Have SEMS any advantages over FreeSWITCH for topology hiding?
>
> More narrow and specialised use-cases, so you don't have to deal with
> stripping it of PBX and miscellaneous application features. It's more of a
> dedicated B2BUA (with its sbc module), in this case.
I tried to use SEMS but I'v
> I've read your article about Kamailio as an SBC and found uac module
> description with uac_restore_from() and uac_restore_to(). It looks
> like suitable for me, so I'll try to use it.
uac_restore_from() and uac_restore_to() works fine, but next I need to
modify ip address in SDP headers in resp
> ... basically no
I've read your article about Kamailio as an SBC and found uac module
description with uac_restore_from() and uac_restore_to(). It looks
like suitable for me, so I'll try to use it.
--
WBR,
Eugene Prokopiev
___
SIP Express Router (SE
On 26/08/14 18:41, Eugene Prokopiev wrote:
Apart from topoh module (an experimental hack in my opinion)
Why experimental? It is used in production in many places.
How it can be used? Mask IP must be different than SIP server local
IP, so it looks like impossible to rewrite public IP address to
On 08/26/2014 12:45 PM, Eugene Prokopiev wrote:
I have some experience with FreeSWITCH but have no one with SEMS. Have
SEMS any advantages over FreeSWITCH for topology hiding?
More narrow and specialised use-cases, so you don't have to deal with
stripping it of PBX and miscellaneous applicati
> You are describing a b2bua, back to back user agent. Freeswitch is what I
> use. There is SEMS and of course asterisk. I don't recommend asterisk.
I have some experience with FreeSWITCH but have no one with SEMS. Have
SEMS any advantages over FreeSWITCH for topology hiding?
--
WBR,
Eugene
>> Apart from topoh module (an experimental hack in my opinion)
>
> Why experimental? It is used in production in many places.
How it can be used? Mask IP must be different than SIP server local
IP, so it looks like impossible to rewrite public IP address to server
local IP address :(
--
WBR,
Eu
On 26/08/14 15:54, Alex Balashov wrote:
On 26 August 2014 09:52:59 GMT-04:00, Daniel-Constantin Mierla
wrote:
On 26/08/14 15:48, Alex Balashov wrote:
Apart from topoh module (an experimental hack in my opinion)
Why experimental? It is used in production in many places.
Does it still have
On 26 August 2014 09:52:59 GMT-04:00, Daniel-Constantin Mierla
wrote:
>
>On 26/08/14 15:48, Alex Balashov wrote:
>> Apart from topoh module (an experimental hack in my opinion)
>Why experimental? It is used in production in many places.
Does it still have the bug where the IP of the bound int
On Aug 26, 2014, at 9:46 AM, Eugene Prokopiev wrote:
> Is it possible at all to do double topology hiding with Kamailio? SIP
> devices with public ip addresses must not know private softswitch
> address and softswitch must not know any public ip address. Softswitch
> must work only with Kamailio
On 26/08/14 15:48, Alex Balashov wrote:
Apart from topoh module (an experimental hack in my opinion)
Why experimental? It is used in production in many places.
Daniel
, basically no. It's a proxy. Proxies are highly transparent. Logical call leg
A in, logical call leg A out. There's no topo
On 26 Aug 2014, at 15:46, Eugene Prokopiev wrote:
> Is it possible at all to do double topology hiding with Kamailio? SIP
> devices with public ip addresses must not know private softswitch
> address and softswitch must not know any public ip address. Softswitch
> must work only with Kamailio pr
Apart from topoh module (an experimental hack in my opinion), basically no.
It's a proxy. Proxies are highly transparent. Logical call leg A in, logical
call leg A out. There's no topology to hide, really.
On 26 August 2014 09:46:29 GMT-04:00, Eugene Prokopiev wrote:
>Is it possible at all to
Is it possible at all to do double topology hiding with Kamailio? SIP
devices with public ip addresses must not know private softswitch
address and softswitch must not know any public ip address. Softswitch
must work only with Kamailio private address.
--
WBR,
Eugene Prokopiev
__
> If you want a different ip address in VIA than the local socket of kamailio,
> then look at set_advertise_address() from core cookbook.
No, it is more important to rewrite To and From headers to source
interface ip address for proxied requests and responses. What is the
right way to do it? Where
Each hop in the path of a SIP request has to add a Via header with its
own address.
If you want a different ip address in VIA than the local socket of
kamailio, then look at set_advertise_address() from core cookbook.
Cheers,
Daniel
On 26/08/14 12:31, Eugene Prokopiev wrote:
Now I need to h
Now I need to hide local topology: rewrite public ip addresses in
sip/sdp headers with internal kamailio address (10.10.10.7) for
incoming requests, rewrite internal softswitch address with public
kamailio ip address (10.7.7.7) and forward rtp packets. So, I have
rtpproxy running:
$ ps aux | grep
> The above config should work, but you need to load pv module.
Thanks, this helps
--
WBR,
Eugene Prokopiev
___
SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list
sr-users@lists.sip-router.org
http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/m
On 26/08/14 08:55, Eugene Prokopiev wrote:
Which module/function need I use to simple forward any
request/responce to another sip server?
Is forward function enought for me -
http://www.kamailio.org/wiki/cookbooks/4.1.x/core#forward ? I tried to
use:
route {
$du = "sip:10.10.10.50:5060;trans
> route {
> $du = "sip:10.10.10.50:5060;transport=udp";
> forward();
> }
similar opensips configuration:
route {
forward("10.10.10.50:5060");
}
works as expected - opensips forwards requests and even responses back
how to do the same in kamailio?
--
WBR,
Eugene Prokopiev
__
> Which module/function need I use to simple forward any
> request/responce to another sip server?
Is forward function enought for me -
http://www.kamailio.org/wiki/cookbooks/4.1.x/core#forward ? I tried to
use:
route {
$du = "sip:10.10.10.50:5060;transport=udp";
forward();
}
but I can't see
> Is it possible to run kamailio without database support (even dbtext)?
Yes, minimal stub may be looks like:
loadmodule "mi_fifo.so"
loadmodule "kex.so"
loadmodule "sl.so"
modparam("mi_fifo", "fifo_name", "/tmp/kamailio_fifo")
route {
sl_send_reply("503", "Server is not configured");
}
Whic
Hi,
Is it possible to run kamailio without database support (even dbtext)?
Where can I find minimal configuration example with minimal modules
set only for forwarding any requests/responses from one ip address to
another one?
--
WBR,
Eugene Prokopiev
24 matches
Mail list logo
