Hi Rehan,
No matter which mode you are running rtpproxy in that IP will always be the
IP of the machine it is running on.
That means that SDP will take that IP once routed to locally subnet A2B
servers.
As far as the A2B detecting SIP user as online or offline based on DB, I
am not too sure about
Dear All
I m trying to setup kamailio and asterisk in load balancing with a2billing
. Currently all of my VMs, one Kamailio and two asterisks are on same
subnet . I have started the RTPproxy like below
./rtpproxy -s udp:127.0.0.1:7722 -l X.X.X.153 -m 1 -M 5 -u root
root -F -d INFO LOG_LOC
th the new
version. I will let you know if I reproduce the issue with the new version.
Regards,
Igor.
De : sr-users [mailto:sr-users-boun...@lists.sip-router.org] De la part de
Maxim Sobolev
Envoyé : lundi 9 mars 2015 19:09
À : Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List
Objet : Re: [SR-Users] RTPP
e* Maxim Sobolev
> *Envoyé :* samedi 7 mars 2015 09:14
>
> *À :* Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List
> *Objet :* Re: [SR-Users] RTPProxy issue?
>
>
>
> Ah, ok, I see now. I did not realize you guys are using resizer. Which
> version of the software are you actually using? I.e. i
lev
Envoyé : samedi 7 mars 2015 09:14
À : Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List
Objet : Re: [SR-Users] RTPProxy issue?
Ah, ok, I see now. I did not realize you guys are using resizer. Which version
of the software are you actually using? I.e. is it latest rel_2_0 / master, or
some legacy 1.x c
ards,
>
>
>
> Igor.
>
>
>
> *De :* sr-users [mailto:sr-users-boun...@lists.sip-router.org] *De la
> part de* Maxim Sobolev
> *Envoyé :* vendredi 6 mars 2015 07:44
> *À :* Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List
> *Objet :* Re: [SR-Users] RTPProxy issue?
>
>
>
&
mail.com
<mailto:igor.potjevle...@gmail.com> ]
Envoyé : jeudi 5 mars 2015 11:34
À : mico...@gmail.com <mailto:mico...@gmail.com> ; 'Kamailio (SER) - Users
Mailing List'
Objet : RE: [SR-Users] RTPProxy issue?
Hello,
Thank you.
Just to let you know, the RTPProxy
..@gmail.com]
> *Envoyé :* jeudi 5 mars 2015 11:34
> *À :* mico...@gmail.com; 'Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List'
> *Objet :* RE: [SR-Users] RTPProxy issue?
>
>
>
> Hello,
>
>
>
> Thank you.
>
>
>
> Just to let you know, the RTPProxy is running in
"True" is coming from the UA.
The RTPProxy stops forward since this packet.
Regards,
Igor.
De : Igor Potjevlesch [mailto:igor.potjevle...@gmail.com]
Envoyé : jeudi 5 mars 2015 11:34
À : mico...@gmail.com; 'Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List'
Objet : RE: [SR-Us
: [SR-Users] RTPProxy issue?
Hello,
maybe Maxim (cc-ed) will be able to provide more insights.
Cheers,
DAniel
On 04/03/15 16:59, Igor Potjevlesch wrote:
Hello,
I discovered an issue related to the handling of "timestamp" and/or "Marker
bit" with rtpproxy (I use
Hello,
maybe Maxim (cc-ed) will be able to provide more insights.
Cheers,
DAniel
On 04/03/15 16:59, Igor Potjevlesch wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
>
>
> I discovered an issue related to the handling of "timestamp" and/or
> "Marker bit" with rtpproxy (I use the latest Extension 20081224).
>
>
>
> The c
Hello,
I discovered an issue related to the handling of "timestamp" and/or "Marker
bit" with rtpproxy (I use the latest Extension 20081224).
The call-flow is the following: one UA places a call to A and put this call
on hold. Then, the same UA call another number B. Individual streams are o
Hi,
sorry, I had a misunderstanding of how rtpproxy starts working. The r flag
indeed fixed the problem.
Thanks,
Sebastian
On Mon, Jul 8, 2013 at 2:32 PM, Daniel-Constantin Mierla
wrote:
>
> Hi Sebastian,
>
> I understood, the 'r' flag (iirc being the right one) tells to rtpproxy
to trust the
Hi Sebastian,
I understood, the 'r' flag (iirc being the right one) tells to rtpproxy
to trust the ip in sdp and send the rtp to it as soon as received from
the other side. It is the same case as chaining many rtpproxies.
Cheers,
Daniel
On 7/8/13 2:25 PM, Sebastian Damm wrote:
Hi Daniel,
s
Hi Daniel,
sorry, I probably didn't explain the problem correctly. The SIP part is
okay, the ports on the rtpproxy are allocated, but bridging the audio
doesn't work until both parties actually send at least one RTP packet.
Since both streams (the inbound and the outbound call) end up at one of th
Hello,
iirc the flag, for the requests/replies coming from b2bua, use the 'r'
as part of parameters to rtpproxy functions -- check the readme of the
module.
Cheers,
Daniel
On 7/8/13 1:52 PM, Sebastian Damm wrote:
Hi,
we are building a setup where we use an rtpproxy in all cases. This
work
Hi,
we are building a setup where we use an rtpproxy in all cases. This works
fine except for one scenario.
Caller -> SIP(+rtpproxy) -> B2BUA -> SIP(+rtpproxy) -> Called
In this case, the B2BUA implements forwarding and sends the call back
through our setup. The B2BUA does not send out a 183 rep
I had the same problem when calling mediaproxy twice by mistake.
rtpproxy_manage( ) calls implicitely rtpproxy_offer( ). This is the problem.
Either you use only rtpproxy_manage once on the INVITE and let it start and
terminate the session, or you use rtpproxy_offer, rtpproxy_answer and
rtpproxy_
I call rtpproxy_offer() once, but i use also rtpproxy_manage().
When i disable rttproxy_mange(), it works well.
Thanks!
On Wed, May 9, 2012 at 2:57 PM, Andreas Granig wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 05/09/2012 02:40 PM, Openser Kamailio wrote:
> > *Owner/Connection Information (o)*: doubango 1983 678901 IN
Hi,
On 05/09/2012 02:40 PM, Openser Kamailio wrote:
> *Owner/Connection Information (o)*: doubango 1983 678901 IN IP4
> *172.27.170.984* 172.27.170.98
> *Connection Information (c)*: IN IP4 *172.27.170.984* 172.27.170.98
Could it be possible that you're calling rtpproxy_offer() twice?
Andreas
Hi,
i'm currently working with kamailio 3.2 and rtpproxy 1.2.1. Both are set up
on the same computer.
When rtpproxy adds an SDP to an Invite, it adds two IPv4 addresses in
owner/creator session and connection information field with an error, i.e:
*Owner/Connection Information (o)*: doubango 1983
21 matches
Mail list logo
