On 17/07/14 20:56, Andras FOGARASI wrote:
On 7/17/14, 5:34 PM, Frank Carmickle wrote:
On Jul 17, 2014, at 11:27 AM, Andras FOGARASI fogar...@fogarasi.com wrote:
On 7/17/14, 3:41 PM, Frank Carmickle wrote:
I would expect that if it was a NAT issue you would see it much sooner than 15
On Jul 16, 2014, at 4:05 PM, Andras FOGARASI fogar...@fogarasi.com wrote:
On 7/16/14, 10:00 PM, Frank Carmickle wrote:
On Jul 16, 2014, at 3:54 PM, Daniel-Constantin Mierla mico...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hello,
I expect that the signaling is ok at least for call setup.
From signling
On 7/17/14, 3:41 PM, Frank Carmickle wrote:
On Jul 16, 2014, at 4:05 PM, Andras FOGARASI fogar...@fogarasi.com wrote:
On 7/16/14, 10:00 PM, Frank Carmickle wrote:
On Jul 16, 2014, at 3:54 PM, Daniel-Constantin Mierla mico...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hello,
I expect that the signaling is ok
On Jul 17, 2014, at 11:27 AM, Andras FOGARASI fogar...@fogarasi.com wrote:
On 7/17/14, 3:41 PM, Frank Carmickle wrote:
I would expect that if it was a NAT issue you would see it much sooner than
15 minutes, 30-60 seconds. Are session timers being stripped by Kamailio?
You say it's a
On 7/17/14, 5:34 PM, Frank Carmickle wrote:
On Jul 17, 2014, at 11:27 AM, Andras FOGARASI fogar...@fogarasi.com wrote:
On 7/17/14, 3:41 PM, Frank Carmickle wrote:
I would expect that if it was a NAT issue you would see it much sooner than
15 minutes, 30-60 seconds. Are session timers
Hi,
I have a simple kamailio install (2 servers, using location service and
a failover node with dispatcher, STUN, clients behind different NATs),
without rtpproxy, only peer-to-peer RTP and TURN server if the
connection is really messy (it's not relevant here). Signaling is over
TLS. Both of
Hello,
I expect that the signaling is ok at least for call setup.
From signling point of view, I can think of following situations:
- endpoints send keep alive packets (or session updates) which are no
answered. You can add an xlog(...) at the top of request_route{} and
reply_route{} blocks
On Jul 16, 2014, at 3:54 PM, Daniel-Constantin Mierla mico...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello,
I expect that the signaling is ok at least for call setup.
From signling point of view, I can think of following situations:
- endpoints send keep alive packets (or session updates) which are no
On 7/16/14, 10:00 PM, Frank Carmickle wrote:
On Jul 16, 2014, at 3:54 PM, Daniel-Constantin Mierla mico...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hello,
I expect that the signaling is ok at least for call setup.
From signling point of view, I can think of following situations:
- endpoints send keep alive
