Re: [SR-Users] WEBRTC Confusion (2)

2016-07-20 Thread Zaka
Colin, There is gratitude for you for your time and exceptional consideration. I am really indebted, mate! Here in Albanian culture "I owe you a coffee" (no a dinner!) :) So as per your advice, I shall stick to the run of the mill clients at this stage, rather than reinvent a slightly better whee

Re: [SR-Users] WEBRTC Confusion (2)

2016-07-19 Thread Colin Morelli
Zakia, Alright, starting with the basics: IP based voice/video communications generally involve two distinct responsibilities: signaling and media. The job of the signaling layer is to exchange information about calls between two parties. For example, if I call you, I use my signaling protocol to

Re: [SR-Users] WEBRTC Confusion (2)

2016-07-19 Thread Zaka
Hello Colin: Thanks a lot! It solved the issue. Though I had got a hint by succeeding to specify the address using *kamailio -l desired address/port *option, yet never noticed the lack of *MY-WS_ADDRESS* Last, but not the least, in a browser supporting WEBRTC (FF, CHROME) do we still need SIP ML5

Re: [SR-Users] WEBRTC Confusion (2)

2016-07-16 Thread Colin Morelli
Zaka, I could be wrong here but I don't think you ever actually have a "listen" line for MY_WS_ADDR. I believe you have a typo, as you have listen=MY_IP_ADDR twice, once within the guard for WITH_WEBSOCKETS. Replace the one inside the if with MY_WS_ADDR and I think your problem should be resolved

[SR-Users] WEBRTC Confusion (2)

2016-07-16 Thread Zaka
Dear List: I am still stuck. Still unable to get Kamailio to listen on WEBRTC port* (in this case 8000)* Please advise if it has something to do with disabling TLS/MSRP? Please see the log & related config file in line here: *Log:* 0(5724) INFO: [ppcfg.c:82]: pp_subst_add(): ### added subst

Re: [SR-Users] webrtc tlsv1 alert access denied

2016-05-26 Thread Daniel-Constantin Mierla
Hello, On 26/05/16 18:36, Arsen wrote: > Hi Daniel, > > nope debug=3 doens't give more info. does this mean that you don't see other log messages from tls or that those messages don't give any useful detail? > I have the same certificate on the web server and on the kamailio > (same crt/key on b

Re: [SR-Users] webrtc tlsv1 alert access denied

2016-05-26 Thread Arsen
Hi Daniel, nope debug=3 doens't give more info. I have the same certificate on the web server and on the kamailio (same crt/key on both) Thanks in advance On Thu, May 26, 2016 at 5:58 PM, Daniel-Constantin Mierla wrote: > Hello, > > if you run with debug=3, do you get more hints from the debug

Re: [SR-Users] webrtc tlsv1 alert access denied

2016-05-26 Thread Daniel-Constantin Mierla
Hello, if you run with debug=3, do you get more hints from the debug messages? I guess you require client certificate in your config. Cheers, Daniel On 26/05/16 15:06, Arsen wrote: > Hi guys! > > I am trying to configure kamailio with WSS. > We have trusted certificate installed SIP over TCP/T

[SR-Users] webrtc tlsv1 alert access denied

2016-05-26 Thread Arsen
Hi guys! I am trying to configure kamailio with WSS. We have trusted certificate installed SIP over TCP/TLS works fine. But when I try WSS I got error: ERROR: tls [tls_util.h:42]: tls_err_ret(): TLS read:error:14094419:SSL routines:SSL3_READ_BYTES:tlsv1 alert access denied ERROR: [tcp_read.c:

Re: [SR-Users] WebRTC

2016-05-18 Thread Moacir Ferreira
Great Daniel! Problem solved. Thanks, Moacir To: sr-users@lists.sip-router.org From: mico...@gmail.com Date: Wed, 18 May 2016 07:08:02 +0200 Subject: Re: [SR-Users] WebRTC Hello, if you don't have a trusted certificate, then browse first to https://kamailioip

Re: [SR-Users] WebRTC

2016-05-17 Thread Daniel-Constantin Mierla
Hello, if you don't have a trusted certificate, then browse first to https://kamailioip:5061 (or your wss port) and accept the certificate. If not working, maybe we can figure out what is the issue if you post the logs with debug=3 here. Cheers, Daniel On 16/05/16 18:11, Moacir Ferreira wrote:

Re: [SR-Users] WebRTC

2016-05-16 Thread M S
You can start with websockets module documentation. It gives details explaination of how it works and what needs to be done in config. http://kamailio.org/docs/modules/4.4.x/modules/websocket.html#idp1214176 I have worked with JSSIP, SIPML5 and a few others using Kamailio and FreeSWITCH, all work

[SR-Users] WebRTC

2016-05-16 Thread Moacir Ferreira
Hi, I am trying to use Kamailio with WebTRC to make and receive calls from the browser. Using the rpms from the Kamailio repository I have installed and tried the websocket config example from the source code. Using the first debug example from here https://www.kamailio.org/wiki/tutorials/tls

[SR-Users] WebRTC integration

2016-05-15 Thread Moacir Ferreira
Hi, I am trying to use Kamailio with WebTRC to make and receive calls from the browser. Using the rpms from the Kamailio repository I have installed and tried the websocket config example from the source code. Using the first debug example from here https://www.kamailio.org/wiki/tutorials/tls

Re: [SR-Users] WebRTC no longer supports RTP

2015-12-10 Thread Yuriy Gorlichenko
I already use DTLS-SRTP (websockets dont works with RTP). This is my SDP body. And I have no sound at incoming calls tcpdump shows me that I have no rtp strean fro websocket endpoint v=0 o=root 1828066564 1828066564 IN IP4 1.1.1.1 s=Cattaxi Media Server c=IN IP4 1.1.1.1 t=0 0 m=audio 30328 RTP/SA

Re: [SR-Users] WebRTC no longer supports RTP

2015-12-10 Thread Vasiliy Ganchev
Hi! use DTLS-SRTP, to say how to handle it with rtpengine - I think you should provide more info about your setup, and call cases Cheers! -- View this message in context: http://sip-router.1086192.n5.nabble.com/WebRTC-no-longer-supports-RTP-tp143834p143836.html Sent from the Users mailing list

[SR-Users] WebRTC no longer supports RTP

2015-12-10 Thread Yuriy Gorlichenko
https://developers.google.com/web/updates/2015/10/chrome-47-webrtc So at 47 chrome we already have no sound. What kind of proto we must use and how to handle this with rtpengine? Do anyone have same problems with it? ___ SIP Express Router (SER) and Kama

Re: [SR-Users] webrtc

2015-09-06 Thread Slava Bendersky
Hello Giovanni, I fixed webrtc call working right now. I checked debug again and I so 408 error. There was missing record_route() for first INVITE. Thank you for help. Slava. From: "Giovanni Maruzzelli" To: "sr-users" Sent: Saturday, 5 September, 2015 07:50:29 Su

Re: [SR-Users] webrtc

2015-09-06 Thread Slava Bendersky
Hello Giovanni, Here SDP webrtc call traffic capture on kamailio side http://fpaste.org/264289/15798761/ password from paste: kamailio Slava. From: "Giovanni Maruzzelli" To: "sr-users" Sent: Saturday, 5 September, 2015 07:50:29 Subject: Re: [SR-Users] webrtc

Re: [SR-Users] webrtc

2015-09-05 Thread Giovanni Maruzzelli
First thing, check that you can have a webRTC call directly with FreeSWITCH, without passing by Kamailio. If that works, and it does not work through Kamailio, then provide kamailio config, freeswitch config, and debug log from both. On Sat, Sep 5, 2015 at 12:51 AM, Slava Bendersky wrote: > H

[SR-Users] webrtc

2015-09-05 Thread Slava Bendersky
Hello Everyone, I am trying setup webrtc call with freeswitch. [root@canlvprx01 kamailio]# rpm -qa | grep kamailio kamailio-4.3.1-4.4.fc21.x86_64 Case: INTERNET eth0 | eth1 LAN | Web Browser >webrtc > kamailio > freeswitch Getting this error Sep 4 00:22:06 canlvprx01 /us

[SR-Users] webrtc not working in different networks

2015-08-28 Thread Achintha
Hi, I have configured kamailio 4.3.1 with mysql ,rtpproxy,websocket modules , then I tried to call through the two extensions using x-lite phone and get the capture. Call is connected. In that test rtp was going through the rtpproxy server, Then I configured jssip to test webrtc in this setu

Re: [SR-Users] WebRTC video calls

2015-05-04 Thread Daniel-Constantin Mierla
Hello, kamailio + rtpengine can be used for webrtc calls between browsers as well as browser to classic sip phones. You can fine on github some config examples, published by Carlos Ruiz Diaz. Using this combination you can place an instance in front of asterisk and let asterisk behave as a classi

[SR-Users] WebRTC video calls

2015-05-01 Thread Ivan Vujisic
I made successful audio calls from browser to browser using Asterisk 13.1 and SIPML5 browser phone. Asterisk can't manage WebRTC video calls due to lack of codec negotiation module, but I also faced RTP ports NAT traversal issue. To my understanding Kamailio is capable to resolve this. Can anybo

Re: [SR-Users] WebRTC to PSTN call, proxied through Kamailio

2015-02-13 Thread Rahul MathuR
Thank you Marc. On Thu, Feb 12, 2015 at 11:51 PM, Marc Soda wrote: > Our config is based on the example config and the WebRTC bits are based on > Carlos'. > I've attached the relevant parts. It's pretty heavily customized to our > specific environment. The main differences are the way that w

Re: [SR-Users] WebRTC to PSTN call, proxied through Kamailio

2015-02-12 Thread Marc Soda
Our config is based on the example config and the WebRTC bits are based on Carlos'. I've attached the relevant parts. It's pretty heavily customized to our specific environment. The main differences are the way that we detect a video call, how we route to our backend servers, and that we send vi

Re: [SR-Users] WebRTC to PSTN call, proxied through Kamailio

2015-02-12 Thread Rahul MathuR
Gentle Reminder ! Thanks Warm Regds, Rahul On Thu, Feb 12, 2015 at 12:13 AM, Rahul MathuR wrote: > Thanks guys ! > > I did further investigation of the Chrome logs and found that... (this is > really interesting), even though I disabled Video; still JSsip was sending > video information in the

Re: [SR-Users] WebRTC to PSTN call, proxied through Kamailio

2015-02-11 Thread Rahul MathuR
Thanks guys ! I did further investigation of the Chrome logs and found that... (this is really interesting), even though I disabled Video; still JSsip was sending video information in the m & a lines. The fact that I was trying to call PSTN number made it mandatory to set video port to '0' in 183

Re: [SR-Users] WebRTC to PSTN call, proxied through Kamailio

2015-02-11 Thread Marc Soda
We are in the middle of designing a similar solution with Kamailio and rtpengine and after some initial problems things are going really well. I can tell you that we ended up going with SIPjs over JSSip and it handled a lot of the weird browser specific issues we were having. I'm not sure about t

Re: [SR-Users] WebRTC to PSTN call, proxied through Kamailio

2015-02-11 Thread Ben Langfeld
Maybe you could include you config also? On 10 February 2015 at 15:01, Rahul MathuR wrote: > Hello gents, > > I was trying my hands on getting a successful RTCweb call (JSsip, since > Peter Dunkley mentioned that he's been using JSsip for most of the testing > scenarios..) to PSTN, making my kam

Re: [SR-Users] webrtc clients support using rtpengine

2014-12-18 Thread Juha Heinanen
Richard Fuchs writes: > In the third case, the audio stream was setup as a=sendonly, explaining > the one-way audio. Probably caused by Firefox not being able to access > the playback device. as i reported in another message, i have also lately noticed in my tests that firefox sends invite with a

Re: [SR-Users] webrtc clients support using rtpengine

2014-12-18 Thread Richard Fuchs
On 12/18/14 13:38, Andrey Utkin wrote: > This works: call from sipml to linphone android: > rtpengine: https://gist.github.com/krieger-od/bf8503fe7643c0571b58 > kamailio: https://gist.github.com/krieger-od/c119d64af6edcde3fc46 > ngrep: https://gist.github.com/krieger-od/cb5829be7a55a7acf9d3 > > >

Re: [SR-Users] webrtc clients support using rtpengine

2014-12-18 Thread Andrey Utkin
Also I encounter such issue: even in the working scenario, the hangup of one peer doesn't make the call end for another peer. rtpengine: https://gist.github.com/krieger-od/1cfe84b53dc0d29cfb90 kamailio: https://gist.github.com/krieger-od/11c6bbf7dad15382e81b ngrep: https://gist.github.com/krieger-o

Re: [SR-Users] webrtc clients support using rtpengine

2014-12-18 Thread Andrey Utkin
2014-12-18 20:38 GMT+02:00 Andrey Utkin : > This works: call from sipml to linphone android: > rtpengine: https://gist.github.com/krieger-od/bf8503fe7643c0571b58 > kamailio: https://gist.github.com/krieger-od/c119d64af6edcde3fc46 > ngrep: https://gist.github.com/krieger-od/cb5829be7a55a7acf9d3 > >

Re: [SR-Users] webrtc clients support using rtpengine

2014-12-18 Thread Andrey Utkin
This works: call from sipml to linphone android: rtpengine: https://gist.github.com/krieger-od/bf8503fe7643c0571b58 kamailio: https://gist.github.com/krieger-od/c119d64af6edcde3fc46 ngrep: https://gist.github.com/krieger-od/cb5829be7a55a7acf9d3 This doesn't work: few seconds after answer, there's

Re: [SR-Users] webrtc clients support using rtpengine

2014-12-18 Thread Andrey Utkin
2014-12-18 20:09 GMT+02:00 Andrey Utkin : > 2014-12-18 20:05 GMT+02:00 Richard Fuchs : >> Amazon NAT is exactly why I've mentioned it, because on an Amazon >> system, if you don't use the --interface option correctly >> ($INT_IP!$EXT_IP notation), you get exactly these kinds of write errors >> that

Re: [SR-Users] webrtc clients support using rtpengine

2014-12-18 Thread Andrey Utkin
2014-12-18 20:05 GMT+02:00 Richard Fuchs : > Amazon NAT is exactly why I've mentioned it, because on an Amazon > system, if you don't use the --interface option correctly > ($INT_IP!$EXT_IP notation), you get exactly these kinds of write errors > that show in your log. Thank you, will try with suc

Re: [SR-Users] webrtc clients support using rtpengine

2014-12-18 Thread Richard Fuchs
On 12/18/14 12:55, Andrey Utkin wrote: > 2014-12-18 19:30 GMT+02:00 Richard Fuchs : >> Write error on RTP socket usually indicates an incorrect network setup, >> for example trying to use a source address for IP packets which isn't >> bound to any local network interface (especially if you're sitti

Re: [SR-Users] webrtc clients support using rtpengine

2014-12-18 Thread Andrey Utkin
2014-12-18 19:30 GMT+02:00 Richard Fuchs : > Write error on RTP socket usually indicates an incorrect network setup, > for example trying to use a source address for IP packets which isn't > bound to any local network interface (especially if you're sitting > behind NAT), or local iptables rules re

Re: [SR-Users] webrtc clients support using rtpengine

2014-12-18 Thread Richard Fuchs
On 12/18/14 12:11, Andrey Utkin wrote: > Hi! > I need to establish calls between WebRTC and usual SIP clients > (exactly, sipml/jssip and linphone-android). > I used configs from https://github.com/caruizdiaz/kamailio-ws and > latest git master HEAD of both kamailio and > rtpengine. I got calls fro

[SR-Users] webrtc clients support using rtpengine

2014-12-18 Thread Andrey Utkin
Hi! I need to establish calls between WebRTC and usual SIP clients (exactly, sipml/jssip and linphone-android). I used configs from https://github.com/caruizdiaz/kamailio-ws and latest git master HEAD of both kamailio and rtpengine. I got calls from webrtc to android working correctly (but only wit

Re: [SR-Users] WebRTC + Kamailio as SIP-proxy + rtpproxy(?) as media-proxy

2014-11-27 Thread Ben Langfeld
The main thing you need to look out for is that your registrar supports the Path and Outbound specifications in order to correctly route INVITEs to your WebSocket clients via the edge proxy. I'm in a situation right now where I'm having some difficulty getting a Kamailio WebSocket edge proxy playin

Re: [SR-Users] WebRTC + Kamailio as SIP-proxy + rtpproxy(?) as media-proxy

2014-11-27 Thread Camille Oudot
Hi, > a) Can kamailio be used as sip-proxy while using WebRTC based UA > calling to plain UAC/WebRTC based UAC ? Yes, kamailio can do SIP over websocket, so all you need is a javascript SIP stack (e.g. JsSIP, jain-sip JS, ...) on your WebRTC enabled client. > b) What to use for media proxying (t

[SR-Users] WebRTC + Kamailio as SIP-proxy + rtpproxy(?) as media-proxy

2014-11-26 Thread Rahul MathuR
Hello, I'm new to WebRTC although I've been using kamailio as sip proxy server for few months now. What I really do not know and trying to understand is - a) Can kamailio be used as sip-proxy while using WebRTC based UA calling to plain UAC/WebRTC based UAC ? b) What to use for media proxying (t

[SR-Users] WebRTC meeting Norfolk, 15 October 2014

2014-09-10 Thread Daniel Pocock
I'll be in Norfolk, VA for xTupleCon in October On 15 October, there will be two events for WebRTC: 14:15 a talk about the xTuple WebRTC extension at xTupleCon - must register for xTupleCon to attend this 17:30 a technical / developer workshop at xTuple's offices - free, anybody welcome,

Re: [SR-Users] Webrtc media conversion

2014-08-20 Thread Yuriy Gorlichenko
Use rtpengine for this. You may use rtpproxy-ng module to manipulate options of rtpengine. 20.08.2014 11:07 пользователь написал: > Hi, > > We are using Kamailio as a WebRTC proxy. We have converted the signaling > successfully. > > Now, for media, is it possible to convert srtp to rtp using rtpp

[SR-Users] Webrtc media conversion

2014-08-20 Thread dodul
Hi, We are using Kamailio as a WebRTC proxy. We have converted the signaling successfully. Now, for media, is it possible to convert srtp to rtp using rtpproxy_ng or mediaproxy? If yes can you provide me with some details? Thanks in advanced! Sent from my “contract free” BlackBerry® smartphon

Re: [SR-Users] Webrtc: Don't catch 488 between JSSIP and SIP UA's

2014-06-06 Thread LAA
Hi all, Another attempt, After doing some tests, I saw that one of the problems was that was necessary to comment the following lines within the deffinition of the RELAY route: # enable additional event routes for forwarded requests # - serial forking, RTP relaying handling, a.s.o. #if (i

[SR-Users] Webrtc: Don't catch 488 between JSSIP and SIP UA's

2014-06-02 Thread LAA
Apologize. Previous message was too long. L. El 02/06/2014 20:25, "LAA" escribió: > Hi all, > > Another guy strugling his mind trying to get a configuration to enable > calls between WebRTC UA (JSSIP) to standard SIP UA (Twinkle or SjPhone) > I've been working with the examples that were shared

Re: [SR-Users] webrtc (websockets) to UDP and vice versa

2014-04-01 Thread anfecora
You might need to also add asterisk 12 b2b in order to convert to simple sip to solve issues with ice on the same box. On Apr 1, 2014 11:52 AM, "ik" wrote: > Hello, > > I'm a newbie with Kamailio, and I require to connect webrtc (websockets) > based phones, into a VoIP PBX that does not support w

[SR-Users] webrtc (websockets) to UDP and vice versa

2014-04-01 Thread ik
Hello, I'm a newbie with Kamailio, and I require to connect webrtc (websockets) based phones, into a VoIP PBX that does not support websockets. I wish to create/use Kamailio rules that will translate UDP to websockets and vice versa. I have found few examples over the internet, but as it seems (

Re: [SR-Users] WebRTC - XOR-MAPPED-ADDRESS and bridge mode

2013-11-20 Thread Kelvin Chua
just an update to this issue, this was caused by rtpproxy not answering to a stun binding request but rather relaying it downstream. (for which asterisk as pstn terminator replied with a binding success) i wonder how difficult it is to add stun into rtpproxy? mediaproxy-ng should work but it does

[SR-Users] WebRTC - XOR-MAPPED-ADDRESS and bridge mode

2013-11-19 Thread Kelvin Chua
here is the scenario: kamailio 4.0.4 running in bridge mode eth0 : 10.17.0.202 eth1 : 100.200.30.40 a call comes in from ice enabled webrtc client (chrome) from public internet, kamailio processed the call, no audio. if i replace kamailio with asterisk, audio ok. upon investigating using wireshar