Re: [SR-Users] limit on fail-over in lcr?

2010-12-02 Thread Anders
There was a limit...in how well I had done my job in kamailio.cfg. I had sent it to a failure_route that does not exist within the failure route. Klaus let me to the solution - thanks! --Anders On Wed, Dec 1, 2010 at 5:24 PM, Juha Heinanen wrote: > Anders writes: > >> I cannot find an answer to

[SR-Users] limit on fail-over in lcr?

2010-12-01 Thread Juha Heinanen
Anders writes: > I cannot find an answer to this in the documentation: Is there a limit > to how many fail-overs Kamailio does? I have lcr setup for a > destination where it is rejected with 403 on the first and second > priority, but then it goes no further, even though I have a third > priority

Re: [SR-Users] limit on fail-over in lcr?

2010-12-01 Thread Klaus Darilion
Maybe you have to call t_on_failure() in failure route again? klaus Am 01.12.2010 16:22, schrieb Anders: Hi there, Kamailio 1.5: I cannot find an answer to this in the documentation: Is there a limit to how many fail-overs Kamailio does? I have lcr setup for a destination where it is rejected

Re: [SR-Users] limit on fail-over in lcr?

2010-12-01 Thread Ovidiu Sas
Hello Anders, There is no limitation on the number of failovers in lcr. You need to properly populate your lcr tables. Below you will find an example for openser 1.3. You can adjust it to work with kamailio 1.5. http://voipembedded.com/resources/openser_dbtext_lcr.cfg The lcr module was improve

[SR-Users] limit on fail-over in lcr?

2010-12-01 Thread Anders
Hi there, Kamailio 1.5: I cannot find an answer to this in the documentation: Is there a limit to how many fail-overs Kamailio does? I have lcr setup for a destination where it is rejected with 403 on the first and second priority, but then it goes no further, even though I have a third priority