Hello,
On 9/15/11 11:54 AM, Vitaliy Aleksandrov wrote:
Hi,
Tnx for a fix, t_newtran is working fine with UAC and i don't see any
problems with AVPs.
good than, thanks for testing and giving feedback.
Cheers,
Daniel
On Wed, Sep 14, 2011 at 8:04 PM, Daniel-Constantin Mierla
Hello,
Ok, I will look over it.
Cheers,
Daniel
On Sep 14, 2011, at 6:37 AM, Spencer Thomason spen...@5ninesolutions.com
wrote:
Hi Daniel,
Would it be possible to backport the patch from trunk to fix via branch value
in ack to 200 ok.
The specific commit is:
Hello. I found the difference between my config and yours. I have t_newtran
at the beginning of the request route for all INVITE messages without
to-tag.
Looks like without t_newtran all works fine.
As i understand t_relay creates a new transaction and while first invite
waiting for a db / radius
Hello,
ok, I see the difference, I will test this case as well before releasing
3.1.5 and come back later with another message with more details.
Cheers,
Daniel
On 9/14/11 3:17 PM, Vitaliy Aleksandrov wrote:
Hello. I found the difference between my config and yours. I have
t_newtran at the
Hello,
hopefully it is sorted out. The issue was when creating an empty
transaction for local generated requests in tm module, resulting in
loosing the list to initial transaction created previously in config.
I did tests and went fine - code committed in master and 3.1 branches.
If you can
El Thu, 08 Sep 2011 17:16:24 +0200
Daniel-Constantin Mierla mico...@gmail.com escribió:
Hello,
it's being quite some time since we released 3.1.4, so I am thinking of
packaging soon v3.1.5 out of stable branch 3.1. My plan is to release it
Wednesday, September 14, 2011. Any other
Hello,
On 9/13/11 3:04 PM, Vitaliy Aleksandrov wrote:
Hello,
i tried with a latest 3.1 and now avps works after uac_req_send, but i
can't get avp values from onreply and failure routes.
do you mean no avp is available in onreply and failure routes but they
are available in request route
On 13.09.2011 16:50, Jon Bonilla wrote:
El Thu, 08 Sep 2011 17:16:24 +0200
Daniel-Constantin Mierla mico...@gmail.com escribió:
Hello,
it's being quite some time since we released 3.1.4, so I am thinking of
packaging soon v3.1.5 out of stable branch 3.1. My plan is to release it
On 9/13/11 5:10 PM, Timo Reimann wrote:
On 13.09.2011 16:50, Jon Bonilla wrote:
El Thu, 08 Sep 2011 17:16:24 +0200
Daniel-Constantin Mierlamico...@gmail.com escribió:
Hello,
it's being quite some time since we released 3.1.4, so I am thinking of
packaging soon v3.1.5 out of stable branch
Hello,
I did a small test myself with following config and avp(x) was printed
ok in failure route. All looks fine, so check to see if you don't delete
them directly somehow, avp_print() should help printing all avps, as I
said in previous email.
Cheers,
Daniel
route {
$avp(x) = abc;
Hi Daniel,
Would it be possible to backport the patch from trunk to fix via branch value
in ack to 200 ok.
The specific commit is:
ebb3b085c15b398192cd8e242d46914252278448
It seems that this would be fairly trivial and shouldn't break anything for
3.1.x users.
Thanks,
Spencer
On Sep 8,
Hello,
the bug was associated with an internal tm function used to send the
request. Can you try again with latest branch 3.1, over the weekend I
backported the fix. Let me know if works now for you.
Thanks,
Daniel
On 9/9/11 3:33 PM, Vitaliy Aleksandrov wrote:
There is a bug in UAC module.
There is a bug in UAC module. uac_req_send doesn't restore avps.
I tried to backport your patch to 3.1 but with no success.
Could you add this patch to a new stable release ?
___
SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list
Hello,
it's being quite some time since we released 3.1.4, so I am thinking of
packaging soon v3.1.5 out of stable branch 3.1. My plan is to release it
Wednesday, September 14, 2011. Any other opinions?
Cheers,
Daniel
--
Daniel-Constantin Mierla -- http://www.asipto.com
Kamailio Advanced
14 matches
Mail list logo
