Am 04.11.2015 um 19:36 schrieb Tristan Mahé:
> Simple update to 1024b:
>
> https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/pull/389
Thank you Tristan, 1024 is plenty.
-Sven
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
SIP Express Router (SER) and
Hello,
On 04/11/15 19:36, Tristan Mahé wrote:
> Hello Daniel,
>
> Simple update to 1024b:
>
> https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/pull/389
ok.
>
> I'll try to provide a new config file entry as soon as I can !
That would be great as well!
Cheers,
Daniel
>
> Best,
>
> Tristan.
>
> On 11/04/2015 1
Hello Daniel,
Simple update to 1024b:
https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/pull/389
I'll try to provide a new config file entry as soon as I can !
Best,
Tristan.
On 11/04/2015 12:38 AM, Daniel-Constantin Mierla wrote:
> Hello,
>
> it is ok to increase the size, what would be a good value? Thi
Hello,
it is ok to increase the size, what would be a good value? This would be
something easy.
If someone wants to make a patch to set the size, that's even better.
Cheers,
Daniel
On 04/11/15 00:08, Tristan Mahé wrote:
> Hi Sven,
>
> log_prefix seems to be defined in dprint.c and maximum size
Hi Sven,
log_prefix seems to be defined in dprint.c and maximum size is 128:
#define LOG_PREFIX_SIZE 128
static char log_prefix_buf[LOG_PREFIX_SIZE];
So recompiling with a bigger size could certainly help.
Daniel, could we set the default higher for next releases or provide a
way to increase it
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Am 08.10.15 um 14:58 schrieb Sven Neuhaus:
> I found the culprit: it's a long Call-ID header. The header line is
> 113 characters. Why does it trigger this error even with a
> pv_buffer_size of 65536? Is there some other buffer I can increase
> for l
Hi,
I found the culprit: it's a long Call-ID header. The header line is 113
characters. Why does it trigger this error even with a pv_buffer_size of
65536?
Is there some other buffer I can increase for large Call-Id headers?
-Sven
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
__
Hello,
On 06/10/15 11:20, Sven Neuhaus wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Am 05.10.2015 um 18:46 schrieb Daniel-Constantin Mierla:
>> that might not be related to the core pv buffers, some variables are
>> using their own buffers. You need to identify the variable that throws
>> that error.
>>
>> As a side note, th
Hi,
Am 05.10.2015 um 18:46 schrieb Daniel-Constantin Mierla:
> that might not be related to the core pv buffers, some variables are
> using their own buffers. You need to identify the variable that throws
> that error.
>
> As a side note, the last version should have the default core pv buffer
>
Hello,
that might not be related to the core pv buffers, some variables are
using their own buffers. You need to identify the variable that throws
that error.
As a side note, the last version should have the default core pv buffer
size set to 8kB, maybe the wiki docs were not updated.
Cheers,
Da
Hello,
I'm getting these errors since the last couple of changes I made to the
Kamailio 4.3.x configuration:
ERROR: [pvapi.c:1361]: pv_printf(): no more space for spec value
ERROR: [pvapi.c:1370]: pv_printf(): buffer overflow -- increase
the buffer size...
I'm not even using pv_printf() so thi
11 matches
Mail list logo
