Re: [SR-Users] question about kamailio handling of forwarded invite

2016-01-25 Thread Ding Ma
Yes, you’re absolutely right. It turned out that the Asterisk has this uncommon way of handling ACL. Asterisk assumes “permit”, then runs down the ACL, and changes the status to either “deny” or “permit” based on each matching trunk entry, but the last matching entry of ACL determines the final

Re: [SR-Users] question about kamailio handling of forwarded invite

2016-01-25 Thread Daniel-Constantin Mierla
Hello, parameters in the Via header have nothing to do with authentication. It seems that the key log messages are in Asterisk: [Jan 21 23:13:20] NOTICE[20785][C-0001] acl.c: SIP Peer ACL: Rejecting '10.0.1.30' due to a failure to pass ACL '(BASELINE)' [Jan 21 23:13:20] NOTICE[20785][C-00

[SR-Users] question about kamailio handling of forwarded invite

2016-01-23 Thread DING MA
Hi, all We're trying to build a system that consists of pbx, kamailio and asterisk in the following configuration. pbx (sip trunk) --- kamailio --- asterisk The kamailio and asterisk are integrated with same database. The outgoing calls to pbx works. But there is a problem with incoming calls fr