Re: [SR-Users] rtpproxy VS Turn

2011-09-19 Thread Klaus Darilion
Am 16.09.2011 16:54, schrieb Mikael Williams: ICE is not supported as I select the Media Proxy (which is TURN) manually in some Nat cases...Even note that I do not have peer to peer calls between 2 endpoints, just have VOIP to PSTN calls...All my VOIP customers supports

[SR-Users] rtpproxy VS Turn

2011-09-16 Thread Mikael Williams
Dear All, I would like to ask please if and in case I'm using STUN/TURN for Nat traversal to drp the rtpproxy from my solution as NAT traversal and relay server as I'm using SYUN for NAT traversal and TURN as relay in case of Symmetric NAT Regards ___

Re: [SR-Users] rtpproxy VS Turn

2011-09-16 Thread Klaus Darilion
STUN alone is not 100% sufficient, only ICE+TURN is reliable. Thus, only if all your clients support ICE+TURN then you can drop rtpproxy. klaus On 16.09.2011 16:47, Mikael Williams wrote: Dear All, I would like to ask please if and in case I'm using STUN/TURN for Nat traversal to drp the

Re: [SR-Users] rtpproxy VS Turn

2011-09-16 Thread Mikael Williams
ICE is not supported as I select the Media Proxy (which is TURN) manually in some Nat cases...Even note that I do not have peer to peer calls between 2 endpoints, just have VOIP to PSTN calls...All my VOIP customers supports STUN/TURN but without ICE One more thing: I would like to ask how