On Sat, Sep 23, 2023 at 11:50 AM Daphne Preston-Kendal
wrote:
> I’ve submitted a PR to Arthur making it look slightly clearer:
>
Thanks. Merged and pushed.
> Since this is only an aesthetic change, I assume no new draft version
> needs to be announced.
>
Right.
Also, I haven't asked for a s
That's much better, thanks.
On 9/23/23 14:49, Daphne Preston-Kendal wrote:
I’ve submitted a PR to Arthur making it look slightly clearer:
Since this is only an aesthetic change, I assume no new draft version needs to
be announced.
Daphne
I’ve submitted a PR to Arthur making it look slightly clearer:
Since this is only an aesthetic change, I assume no new draft version needs to
be announced.
Daphne
On 23 Sep 2023, at 20:30, Chris Hanson wrote:
> The example code in "R6RS-compatible semantics" is broken, at least on my
> browser (Firefox). See attached screenshot.
That’s what it’s supposed to look like. I agree it doesn’t look great
layout-wise. Maybe I can change the indentation and/or a
The example code in "R6RS-compatible semantics" is broken, at least on
my browser (Firefox). See attached screenshot.
Scheme Request for Implementation 245,
"Mixing definitions and expressions within bodies",
by Daphne Preston-Kendal,
is now available for discussion.
Its draft and an archive of the ongoing discussion are available at
https://srfi.schemers.org/srfi-245/.
You can join the discussion of the draft b
