On 12/2/02 at 10:16 pm, Mike Chaney said:
>Tag, are you sure this is what you mean?
>
>> John Hemmens is now not legally able to run
>> a business in the UK.
>
>..or is he barred from being a Company director?
>
>Mike
>
>
>
Sorry Mike sloppy writing. Doing 4 things at once.
--
Yours Aye
Ta
Tag, are you sure this is what you mean?
> John Hemmens is now not legally able to run
> a business in the UK.
..or is he barred from being a Company director?
Mike
On 11/2/02 at 3:39 am, Harry Wade said:
>At 04:56 PM 2/11/02 -0800, you wrote:
>>Hi Harry and Tag,
>>In defence of the recent comments regarding the Maxwell Hemmens
>
>Tony,
> I have no need to hang John Hemmens "by a sour apple tree"
>necessarily, I have never met the man, and it may very
On 11/2/02 at 3:39 am, Harry Wade said:
>At 04:56 PM 2/11/02 -0800, you wrote:
>>Hi Harry and Tag,
>>In defence of the recent comments regarding the Maxwell Hemmens
This may possibly be correct. Nevertheless I have known several people
who are very unhappy about their dealings with this organi
At 04:56 PM 2/11/02 -0800, you wrote:
>Hi Harry and Tag,
>In defence of the recent comments regarding the Maxwell Hemmens
Tony,
I have no need to hang John Hemmens "by a sour apple tree"
necessarily, I have never met the man, and it may very well be that the US
perception of Hemmens busin
Hi Harry and Tag,
In defence of the recent comments regarding the Maxwell Hemmens
Company, UK shipments etc. I have some personal input, perspectives, and
experiences with this company, and the original owner Maxwell Hemmens. To
help clarify some of the so called "problems" . i.e. stor
