Hi,
I have opened several tickets regarding ELAPI and INI.
They are tickets 140-143.
Please take a look. Note the priorities.
Comments and suggestions are welcome.
--
Thank you,
Dmitri Pal
Engineering Manager IPA project,
Red Hat Inc.
---
Looking to carve out IT co
On Wed, 2009-08-26 at 11:01 +0200, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
> One more change, while working on #138 I realized that the copyright
> headers were incorrect -- I had a GPLv2 header in my personal c source
> file template, while the rest of the project uses GPLv3.
>
> I also squashed in a fix for a typo
On Fri, 2009-08-28 at 11:49 +0200, Sumit Bose wrote:
> this patch just makes sure that the LDAP backend does not die if the
> group object returned by the LDAP server does not contain a gid. In a
> previous patch I have sent the same fix for uid/gid in a returned user
> object, but have forgotten t
On Fri, 2009-08-28 at 13:55 +0200, Sumit Bose wrote:
>
> a previous patch added a new attribute and also changed the internal
> order of the existing attributes. This patch changes the numbering of
> the attributes to match the new order.
I wonder how it worked without this patch.
Full ACK and p
On Fri, 2009-08-28 at 13:44 +0200, Sumit Bose wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 28, 2009 at 12:16:51PM +0200, Sumit Bose wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > the environment variable which are send back by this patch are
> currently
> > needed in the user session of the client. When the DNS helper is
> > available and used
On Fri, 2009-08-28 at 12:03 +0200, Sumit Bose wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 27, 2009 at 01:58:15PM -0400, Simo Sorce wrote:
> > This patch should make the enumeration code ~ O(log n) instead of
> O(n)
> >
> > On my system it brought enumeration down from 12s to 4s with the
> same
> > data set.
> >
>
> Al
On Fri, 2009-08-28 at 11:53 +0200, Sumit Bose wrote:
> > Sumit,
> > I can't do a successful build with this patch, it says errno_t is
> > re-defined in sss_cli.h when parsing util.h
> >
> > Does it depend on other patches ?
> > Can you check it again against current master ?
> >
>
> ah, sorry, t
>
> > I do not see any of those comments to be critical (unless of cause
> > others do).
> > I would prefer opening tickets to improve different areas and work on
> > them later and take this patch as is.
> > Any concerns or objections?
>
> No, none of this was critical, more like things I noticed
Hi,
a previous patch added a new attribute and also changed the internal
order of the existing attributes. This patch changes the numbering of
the attributes to match the new order.
bye,
Sumit
>From a4e1484f0dc9297f9c609196e4356e97d244ad14 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Sumit Bose
Date: Fri, 28
On Fri, Aug 28, 2009 at 12:16:51PM +0200, Sumit Bose wrote:
> Hi,
>
> the environment variable which are send back by this patch are currently
> needed in the user session of the client. When the DNS helper is
> available and used by the kerberos locator plugin they can be removed.
>
> bye,
> Sum
Hi,
the environment variable which are send back by this patch are currently
needed in the user session of the client. When the DNS helper is
available and used by the kerberos locator plugin they can be removed.
bye,
Sumit
>From 8cc4ea16832b5997bb74d20f12ef5d8505c05e73 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
F
On Thu, Aug 27, 2009 at 01:58:15PM -0400, Simo Sorce wrote:
> This patch should make the enumeration code ~ O(log n) instead of O(n)
>
> On my system it brought enumeration down from 12s to 4s with the same
> data set.
>
Although I haven't measured it I see a speed-up, too.
I have only one issu
On Thu, Aug 27, 2009 at 09:38:14AM -0400, Simo Sorce wrote:
> On Wed, 2009-08-26 at 13:25 +0200, Sumit Bose wrote:
> >
> > I have include the check in the sss_client directory, but I'm
> > reluctant
> > to add it to common, too. IMO the maintainers of the packages should
> > decide if errno_t make
Hi,
this patch just makes sure that the LDAP backend does not die if the
group object returned by the LDAP server does not contain a gid. In a
previous patch I have sent the same fix for uid/gid in a returned user
object, but have forgotten the group object.
bye,
Sumit
>From a9a1c7e26b919c2edb6fa
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
> Thank you for the review.
> My comments are inline.
>
>> Couple of comments:
>> * Instead of putting libprovider.la into _SOURCES, maybe you wanted to
>> add it to libelapi_la_LIBADD?
>>
> I consulted Steve on this one and showed him the makefile.
>
15 matches
Mail list logo