-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 09/11/2009 05:13 PM, Dmitri Pal wrote:
> See patch comment.
Ack
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Fedora - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
iEYEARECAAYFAkqvZMoACgkQHsardTLnvCWSAQCgqHgubpmaSyvdwRSX
Due to differences in autotools, building RPMS on RHEL5 requires the m4
directories to be included in the tarball.
--
Stephen Gallagher
RHCE 804006346421761
Looking to carve out IT costs?
www.redhat.com/carveoutcosts/
From ff0b8bfa91a46fe28a088ad52738d56d63b9c8ff Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: S
On Tue, Sep 15, 2009 at 09:16:24AM -0400, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> Due to differences in autotools, building RPMS on RHEL5 requires the m4
> directories to be included in the tarball.
>
ACK
SLES10 needs this, too.
bye,
Sumit
___
sssd-devel mailing l
We were missing two files from the tarball distribution that
prevented autoreconf from running successfully: VERSION and
replace/autoconf-2.60.m4
This was a request from the Ubuntu dev team, as their build system
requires rerunning autoreconf.
--
Stephen Gallagher
RHCE 804006346421761
Looking to
On Tue, 2009-09-15 at 09:16 -0400, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> Due to differences in autotools, building RPMS on RHEL5 requires the
> m4
> directories to be included in the tarball.
Is there any way to have symlinks between these directories, we have 5
or more copies of the same files (AFAIK) there
On Tue, 2009-09-15 at 09:42 -0400, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> We were missing two files from the tarball distribution that
> prevented autoreconf from running successfully: VERSION and
> replace/autoconf-2.60.m4
>
> This was a request from the Ubuntu dev team, as their build system
> requires reru
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 09/15/2009 09:45 AM, Simo Sorce wrote:
> On Tue, 2009-09-15 at 09:16 -0400, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
>> Due to differences in autotools, building RPMS on RHEL5 requires the
>> m4
>> directories to be included in the tarball.
>
> Is there any way to
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 09/15/2009 05:56 AM, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
> On 09/11/2009 05:13 PM, Dmitri Pal wrote:
>> See patch comment.
>
> Ack
Pushed to master.
___
sssd-devel mailing list
sssd-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org
https://
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 09/15/2009 09:37 AM, Sumit Bose wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 15, 2009 at 09:16:24AM -0400, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
>> Due to differences in autotools, building RPMS on RHEL5 requires the m4
>> directories to be included in the tarball.
>>
>
> ACK
>
> SLE
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 09/15/2009 09:45 AM, Simo Sorce wrote:
> On Tue, 2009-09-15 at 09:42 -0400, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
>> We were missing two files from the tarball distribution that
>> prevented autoreconf from running successfully: VERSION and
>> replace/autoconf-2
On Tue, 2009-09-15 at 09:51 -0400, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On 09/15/2009 09:45 AM, Simo Sorce wrote:
> > On Tue, 2009-09-15 at 09:16 -0400, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> >> Due to differences in autotools, building RPMS on RHEL5 requires the
> >>
This will add a second, optional line to the VERSION file that
will be used by the automated build scripts to create snapshot
versions.
--
Stephen Gallagher
RHCE 804006346421761
Looking to carve out IT costs?
www.redhat.com/carveoutcosts/
From f1bcde7fc13f8d3e21850dae15d2f05da747e56e Mon Sep 17
On Tue, 2009-09-15 at 13:21 -0400, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> This will add a second, optional line to the VERSION file that
> will be used by the automated build scripts to create snapshot
> versions.
Ack
--
Simo Sorce * Red Hat, Inc * New York
___
s
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 09/15/2009 02:37 PM, Simo Sorce wrote:
> On Tue, 2009-09-15 at 13:21 -0400, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
>> This will add a second, optional line to the VERSION file that
>> will be used by the automated build scripts to create snapshot
>> versions.
>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
The SSSD now has a translation project hosted for us by the good people
at transifex.net. It can be found at
http://www.transifex.net/projects/p/sssd/
If you have any interest in seeing the SSSD translated into your
favorite language, please join up a
This patch "should" fix a bug seen today in the wild concerning the
proxy provider.
I say should because I was not able to reproduce the bug in the first
place, but from the debug I've seen this should fix it.
Simo.
--
Simo Sorce * Red Hat, Inc * New York
>From b11ab80038ec140b0b6e5a4dfa6d2e7ff0
16 matches
Mail list logo