Re: [SSSD] [PATCH] INI Error handling and interface cleanup

2009-09-15 Thread Jakub Hrozek
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 09/11/2009 05:13 PM, Dmitri Pal wrote: > See patch comment. Ack -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Fedora - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iEYEARECAAYFAkqvZMoACgkQHsardTLnvCWSAQCgqHgubpmaSyvdwRSX

[SSSD] [PATCH] Include m4 directories in tarball

2009-09-15 Thread Stephen Gallagher
Due to differences in autotools, building RPMS on RHEL5 requires the m4 directories to be included in the tarball. -- Stephen Gallagher RHCE 804006346421761 Looking to carve out IT costs? www.redhat.com/carveoutcosts/ From ff0b8bfa91a46fe28a088ad52738d56d63b9c8ff Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: S

Re: [SSSD] [PATCH] Include m4 directories in tarball

2009-09-15 Thread Sumit Bose
On Tue, Sep 15, 2009 at 09:16:24AM -0400, Stephen Gallagher wrote: > Due to differences in autotools, building RPMS on RHEL5 requires the m4 > directories to be included in the tarball. > ACK SLES10 needs this, too. bye, Sumit ___ sssd-devel mailing l

[SSSD] [PATCH] Allow rerunning autoreconf from the tarball

2009-09-15 Thread Stephen Gallagher
We were missing two files from the tarball distribution that prevented autoreconf from running successfully: VERSION and replace/autoconf-2.60.m4 This was a request from the Ubuntu dev team, as their build system requires rerunning autoreconf. -- Stephen Gallagher RHCE 804006346421761 Looking to

Re: [SSSD] [PATCH] Include m4 directories in tarball

2009-09-15 Thread Simo Sorce
On Tue, 2009-09-15 at 09:16 -0400, Stephen Gallagher wrote: > Due to differences in autotools, building RPMS on RHEL5 requires the > m4 > directories to be included in the tarball. Is there any way to have symlinks between these directories, we have 5 or more copies of the same files (AFAIK) there

Re: [SSSD] [PATCH] Allow rerunning autoreconf from the tarball

2009-09-15 Thread Simo Sorce
On Tue, 2009-09-15 at 09:42 -0400, Stephen Gallagher wrote: > We were missing two files from the tarball distribution that > prevented autoreconf from running successfully: VERSION and > replace/autoconf-2.60.m4 > > This was a request from the Ubuntu dev team, as their build system > requires reru

Re: [SSSD] [PATCH] Include m4 directories in tarball

2009-09-15 Thread Stephen Gallagher
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 09/15/2009 09:45 AM, Simo Sorce wrote: > On Tue, 2009-09-15 at 09:16 -0400, Stephen Gallagher wrote: >> Due to differences in autotools, building RPMS on RHEL5 requires the >> m4 >> directories to be included in the tarball. > > Is there any way to

Re: [SSSD] [PATCH] INI Error handling and interface cleanup

2009-09-15 Thread Stephen Gallagher
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 09/15/2009 05:56 AM, Jakub Hrozek wrote: > On 09/11/2009 05:13 PM, Dmitri Pal wrote: >> See patch comment. > > Ack Pushed to master. ___ sssd-devel mailing list sssd-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org https://

Re: [SSSD] [PATCH] Include m4 directories in tarball

2009-09-15 Thread Stephen Gallagher
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 09/15/2009 09:37 AM, Sumit Bose wrote: > On Tue, Sep 15, 2009 at 09:16:24AM -0400, Stephen Gallagher wrote: >> Due to differences in autotools, building RPMS on RHEL5 requires the m4 >> directories to be included in the tarball. >> > > ACK > > SLE

Re: [SSSD] [PATCH] Allow rerunning autoreconf from the tarball

2009-09-15 Thread Stephen Gallagher
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 09/15/2009 09:45 AM, Simo Sorce wrote: > On Tue, 2009-09-15 at 09:42 -0400, Stephen Gallagher wrote: >> We were missing two files from the tarball distribution that >> prevented autoreconf from running successfully: VERSION and >> replace/autoconf-2

Re: [SSSD] [PATCH] Include m4 directories in tarball

2009-09-15 Thread Simo Sorce
On Tue, 2009-09-15 at 09:51 -0400, Stephen Gallagher wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > On 09/15/2009 09:45 AM, Simo Sorce wrote: > > On Tue, 2009-09-15 at 09:16 -0400, Stephen Gallagher wrote: > >> Due to differences in autotools, building RPMS on RHEL5 requires the > >>

[SSSD] [PATCH] Add PRERELEASE_VERSION variable for use in sssd.spec.i

2009-09-15 Thread Stephen Gallagher
This will add a second, optional line to the VERSION file that will be used by the automated build scripts to create snapshot versions. -- Stephen Gallagher RHCE 804006346421761 Looking to carve out IT costs? www.redhat.com/carveoutcosts/ From f1bcde7fc13f8d3e21850dae15d2f05da747e56e Mon Sep 17

Re: [SSSD] [PATCH] Add PRERELEASE_VERSION variable for use in sssd.spec.i

2009-09-15 Thread Simo Sorce
On Tue, 2009-09-15 at 13:21 -0400, Stephen Gallagher wrote: > This will add a second, optional line to the VERSION file that > will be used by the automated build scripts to create snapshot > versions. Ack -- Simo Sorce * Red Hat, Inc * New York ___ s

Re: [SSSD] [PATCH] Add PRERELEASE_VERSION variable for use in sssd.spec.i

2009-09-15 Thread Stephen Gallagher
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 09/15/2009 02:37 PM, Simo Sorce wrote: > On Tue, 2009-09-15 at 13:21 -0400, Stephen Gallagher wrote: >> This will add a second, optional line to the VERSION file that >> will be used by the automated build scripts to create snapshot >> versions. >

[SSSD] SSSD Translation Project Created

2009-09-15 Thread Stephen Gallagher
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 The SSSD now has a translation project hosted for us by the good people at transifex.net. It can be found at http://www.transifex.net/projects/p/sssd/ If you have any interest in seeing the SSSD translated into your favorite language, please join up a

[SSSD] [PATCH] proxy bug

2009-09-15 Thread Simo Sorce
This patch "should" fix a bug seen today in the wild concerning the proxy provider. I say should because I was not able to reproduce the bug in the first place, but from the debug I've seen this should fix it. Simo. -- Simo Sorce * Red Hat, Inc * New York >From b11ab80038ec140b0b6e5a4dfa6d2e7ff0