-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 09/30/2009 05:15 PM, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> Yes, it is. I didn't want to repeat my previous mistake and push this
> without a second pair of eyes.
The patch looks fine, updates only .po files -- I don't think it's
necessary to update anything e
On Wed, 2009-09-30 at 11:15 -0400, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> Yes, it is. I didn't want to repeat my previous mistake and push this
> without a second pair of eyes.
>
> On Sep 30, 2009, at 11:14 AM, Simo Sorce wrote:
>
> > On Sun, 2009-09-27 at 10:11 -0400, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> >> Sent on
Yes, it is. I didn't want to repeat my previous mistake and push this
without a second pair of eyes.
On Sep 30, 2009, at 11:14 AM, Simo Sorce wrote:
> On Sun, 2009-09-27 at 10:11 -0400, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
>> Sent on behalf of Piotr Drąg
>
> Is this waiting an ack ?
>
> Simo.
>
> __
On Sun, 2009-09-27 at 10:11 -0400, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> Sent on behalf of Piotr Drąg
Is this waiting an ack ?
Simo.
___
sssd-devel mailing list
sssd-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org
https://fedorahosted.org/mailman/listinfo/sssd-devel
On Wed, 2009-09-30 at 09:28 -0400, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> Requiring libldb 0.9.3 explicitly broke using sssd on the Fedora 12 beta.
>
> Pushed to master under the one-line rule.
I'd like to start requiring tevent >= 0.9.8 and ldb >= 0.9.6 at least in
F12 ...
Simo.
__
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Similar to Simo's patch that fixed the tools, this one converts the
python bindings to the start_transaction/end_transaction functions.
Also fixes memory hierarchy so that tools_ctx is allocated in every
operation and used as memory context for the op
Requiring libldb 0.9.3 explicitly broke using sssd on the Fedora 12 beta.
Pushed to master under the one-line rule.
--
Stephen Gallagher
RHCE 804006346421761
Looking to carve out IT costs?
www.redhat.com/carveoutcosts/
From ce32c36ae2154b0fc5d6c53e1e1a67cbf6261364 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 09/28/2009 04:56 AM, Dmitri Pal wrote:
> Resending COLLECTION related patches with issues addressed except
> enhancing sorting. For that I opened a ticket.
> There is one more patch with new functions and couple of enhancements
> added in comparison