Hi,
since the LDAP provider does calls into the krb5 libs it should also be linked
against them :). Attached patch should fix that.
--
regards,
Ralf
From 6169242cc432b48d86eaae03fbee52af69527860 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Ralf Haferkamp rha...@suse.de
Date: Mon, 12 Oct 2009
On Mon, Oct 12, 2009 at 12:20:37PM +0200, Ralf Haferkamp wrote:
Hi,
since the LDAP provider does calls into the krb5 libs it should also be
linked
against them :). Attached patch should fix that.
--
regards,
Ralf
Obviously correct.
ACK
Thanks.
bye,
Sumit
Hi,
Martin was so nice to point me to a bug introduced by the short read
patch. This patch should fix it.
bye,
Sumit
From 190ac953255966ad49d915f9ce6741543a3fa824 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Sumit Bose sb...@redhat.com
Date: Mon, 12 Oct 2009 12:13:36 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] fix a wrong
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 10/12/2009 06:35 AM, Sumit Bose wrote:
Hi,
Martin was so nice to point me to a bug introduced by the short read
patch. This patch should fix it.
bye,
Sumit
___
sssd-devel mailing list
On Fri, Oct 09, 2009 at 04:29:42PM -0400, Simo Sorce wrote:
On Fri, 2009-10-09 at 21:02 +0200, Sumit Bose wrote:
Hi,
this one should fix #223. Because sshd runs as root the old password
was
not sent to sssd and changing the user password failed. Please review
carefully.
I guess
Hi,
Although there are lots of DEBUG calls in krb5_child it always runs with
debug_level=0. This patch starts krb5_child with the debugging options
of the backend.
There is a problem with --debug-to-files. krb5_child runs as the user
requesting the ticket so the path to krb5_child.log needs to
On Mon, 2009-10-12 at 15:46 +0200, Sumit Bose wrote:
There is a problem with --debug-to-files. krb5_child runs as the user
requesting the ticket so the path to krb5_child.log needs to have
matching permissions. A possible solution would be to create the file
with 666 permissions during the
On Mon, 2009-10-12 at 09:49 -0400, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
This is what the ELAPI is for.
No ELAPI is for logging not for the debug stuff, and an api can't
overcome file permissions no more than anything else.
Just pass the fd to the client, it's simple and doesn't require us to
replicate
Stephen Gallagher wrote:
On 10/12/2009 10:29 AM, Simo Sorce wrote:
On Mon, 2009-10-12 at 09:49 -0400, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
This is what the ELAPI is for.
No ELAPI is for logging not for the debug stuff, and an api can't
overcome file permissions no more than anything else.
ELAPI has
Simo Sorce wrote:
On Mon, 2009-10-12 at 10:47 -0400, Dmitri Pal wrote:
Just pass the fd to the client, it's simple and doesn't require us to
replicate logic to open/close debug files in the children.
I didn't realize you could do that.
I am not sure this approach is
On Mon, Oct 12, 2009 at 12:10:43PM -0400, Dmitri Pal wrote:
Simo Sorce wrote:
On Mon, 2009-10-12 at 10:47 -0400, Dmitri Pal wrote:
Just pass the fd to the client, it's simple and doesn't require us to
replicate logic to open/close debug files in the children.
I didn't
--
Stephen Gallagher
RHCE 804006346421761
Looking to carve out IT costs?
www.redhat.com/carveoutcosts/
From f5db2669075b92a636098c65d9e7acf630e87eb6 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Stephen Gallagher sgall...@redhat.com
Date: Mon, 12 Oct 2009 17:20:22 -0400
Subject: [PATCH] Package SSSDConfig API
On Mon, 2009-10-12 at 17:21 -0400, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
ACK
--
Simo Sorce * Red Hat, Inc * New York
___
sssd-devel mailing list
sssd-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org
https://fedorahosted.org/mailman/listinfo/sssd-devel
13 matches
Mail list logo
