On Mon, 2009-10-12 at 17:21 -0400, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
""
ACK
--
Simo Sorce * Red Hat, Inc * New York
___
sssd-devel mailing list
sssd-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org
https://fedorahosted.org/mailman/listinfo/sssd-devel
--
Stephen Gallagher
RHCE 804006346421761
Looking to carve out IT costs?
www.redhat.com/carveoutcosts/
From f5db2669075b92a636098c65d9e7acf630e87eb6 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Stephen Gallagher
Date: Mon, 12 Oct 2009 17:20:22 -0400
Subject: [PATCH] Package SSSDConfig API
---
contrib/sssd.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 10/12/2009 03:01 PM, Simo Sorce wrote:
> When only LOCAL is configured I forgot to mark the services started at
> startup, so they were started twice.
>
> Simo.
>
>
>
>
> ___
> sssd-devel mailing list
When only LOCAL is configured I forgot to mark the services started at
startup, so they were started twice.
Simo.
--
Simo Sorce * Red Hat, Inc * New York
>From 06e29cdf515715646b8c273a17672ba98165a27a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Simo Sorce
Date: Mon, 12 Oct 2009 08:55:24 -0400
Subject: [PATC
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 10/12/2009 06:32 AM, Sumit Bose wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 12, 2009 at 12:20:37PM +0200, Ralf Haferkamp wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> since the LDAP provider does calls into the krb5 libs it should also be
>> linked
>> against them :). Attached patch should fix t
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 10/12/2009 07:48 AM, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> On 10/12/2009 06:35 AM, Sumit Bose wrote:
>> Hi,
>
>> Martin was so nice to point me to a bug introduced by the short read
>> patch. This patch should fix it.
>
>> bye,
>> Sumit
>
>
>
>> _
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 10/12/2009 02:11 PM, Simo Sorce wrote:
> On Mon, 2009-10-12 at 13:54 -0400, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
>>
>> New patch attached.
>
> Looks good to me.
>
> Ack.
>
> Simo.
Pushed to master.
- --
Stephen Gallagher
RHCE 804006346421761
Looking to c
On Mon, 2009-10-12 at 13:54 -0400, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
>
> New patch attached.
Looks good to me.
Ack.
Simo.
--
Simo Sorce * Red Hat, Inc * New York
___
sssd-devel mailing list
sssd-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org
https://fedorahosted.org/mailman/l
On Mon, Oct 12, 2009 at 12:10:43PM -0400, Dmitri Pal wrote:
> Simo Sorce wrote:
> > On Mon, 2009-10-12 at 10:47 -0400, Dmitri Pal wrote:
> >
> >
> Just pass the fd to the client, it's simple and doesn't require us to
> replicate logic to open/close debug files in the children.
>
Simo Sorce wrote:
> On Mon, 2009-10-12 at 12:10 -0400, Dmitri Pal wrote:
>
>> Yes this way it is standard. I thought you wanted to pass a socket
>> between processes later after fork.
>> But here is the question. If you have multiple children writing to the
>> same fd at the same time how you th
On Mon, 2009-10-12 at 12:10 -0400, Dmitri Pal wrote:
> Yes this way it is standard. I thought you wanted to pass a socket
> between processes later after fork.
> But here is the question. If you have multiple children writing to the
> same fd at the same time how you then sort which one has written
Simo Sorce wrote:
> On Mon, 2009-10-12 at 10:47 -0400, Dmitri Pal wrote:
>
>
Just pass the fd to the client, it's simple and doesn't require us to
replicate logic to open/close debug files in the children.
>>> I didn't realize you could do that.
>>>
>>>
>> I am not
On Mon, 2009-10-12 at 10:47 -0400, Dmitri Pal wrote:
> > > Just pass the fd to the client, it's simple and doesn't require us to
> > > replicate logic to open/close debug files in the children.
> >
> > I didn't realize you could do that.
> >
>
> I am not sure this approach is portable.
> I know S
Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> On 10/12/2009 10:29 AM, Simo Sorce wrote:
> > On Mon, 2009-10-12 at 09:49 -0400, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> >> This is what the ELAPI is for.
> > No ELAPI is for logging not for the debug stuff, and an api can't
> > overcome file permissions no more than anything else.
>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 10/12/2009 10:29 AM, Simo Sorce wrote:
> On Mon, 2009-10-12 at 09:49 -0400, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
>> This is what the ELAPI is for.
>
> No ELAPI is for logging not for the debug stuff, and an api can't
> overcome file permissions no more than an
On Mon, 2009-10-12 at 09:49 -0400, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> This is what the ELAPI is for.
No ELAPI is for logging not for the debug stuff, and an api can't
overcome file permissions no more than anything else.
Just pass the fd to the client, it's simple and doesn't require us to
replicate logi
On Mon, 2009-10-12 at 15:46 +0200, Sumit Bose wrote:
> There is a problem with --debug-to-files. krb5_child runs as the user
> requesting the ticket so the path to krb5_child.log needs to have
> matching permissions. A possible solution would be to create the file
> with 666 permissions during the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 10/12/2009 09:46 AM, Sumit Bose wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Although there are lots of DEBUG calls in krb5_child it always runs with
> debug_level=0. This patch starts krb5_child with the debugging options
> of the backend.
>
> There is a problem with --debu
Hi,
Although there are lots of DEBUG calls in krb5_child it always runs with
debug_level=0. This patch starts krb5_child with the debugging options
of the backend.
There is a problem with --debug-to-files. krb5_child runs as the user
requesting the ticket so the path to krb5_child.log needs to ha
On Mon, 2009-10-12 at 14:49 +0200, Sumit Bose wrote:
> > Do they skip checks or ignore if the provided password is valid or
> not ?
> > Should we think of forking a child in proxy and running it as the
> user
> > that is attempting the password change? (Assuming we know it ?)
>
> I think forking i
On Fri, Oct 09, 2009 at 04:29:42PM -0400, Simo Sorce wrote:
> On Fri, 2009-10-09 at 21:02 +0200, Sumit Bose wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > this one should fix #223. Because sshd runs as root the old password
> > was
> > not sent to sssd and changing the user password failed. Please review
> > carefully.
>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 10/12/2009 06:35 AM, Sumit Bose wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Martin was so nice to point me to a bug introduced by the short read
> patch. This patch should fix it.
>
> bye,
> Sumit
>
>
>
> ___
> sssd-devel maili
Hi,
Martin was so nice to point me to a bug introduced by the short read
patch. This patch should fix it.
bye,
Sumit
>From 190ac953255966ad49d915f9ce6741543a3fa824 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Sumit Bose
Date: Mon, 12 Oct 2009 12:13:36 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] fix a wrong argument to unpack_buff
On Mon, Oct 12, 2009 at 12:20:37PM +0200, Ralf Haferkamp wrote:
> Hi,
>
> since the LDAP provider does calls into the krb5 libs it should also be
> linked
> against them :). Attached patch should fix that.
>
> --
> regards,
> Ralf
Obviously correct.
ACK
Thanks.
bye,
Sumit
__
Hi,
since the LDAP provider does calls into the krb5 libs it should also be linked
against them :). Attached patch should fix that.
--
regards,
Ralf
From 6169242cc432b48d86eaae03fbee52af69527860 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Ralf Haferkamp
Date: Mon, 12 Oct 2009 11:50:30 +0200
Subject
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 10/06/2009 08:29 PM, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> Nack after all. Jenny noticed that there are some places where the
> returned error code should be nonzero and it is not.
>
> Please fix these up and resubmit.
I looked at the test cases and I think
26 matches
Mail list logo