-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Fixes: #261
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Fedora - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
iEYEARECAAYFAkr4DYkACgkQHsardTLnvCXsowCfT+Y397TDtbHi/URDiQ9QGTJp
YFMAnjM94R+flCjOxwmjJAw4snG7U4FO
=inC1
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 11/09/2009 07:36 AM, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
On 11/09/2009 05:11 AM, Sumit Bose wrote:
On Sun, Nov 08, 2009 at 01:19:35AM -0500, Simo Sorce wrote:
Save all entries, not just the first one.
Simo.
ACK
bye,
Sumit
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 11/09/2009 07:52 AM, Brian J. Murrell wrote:
On Mon, 2009-11-09 at 07:33 -0500, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
Brian, can you open a bug at https://fedorahosted.org
I would but I can't make out the stupid captcha and there is no button
to generate
On Thu, 2009-11-05 at 16:27 -0500, Brian J. Murrell wrote:
I didn't see any response to the following. As far as I can see and
have explained this is still a problem. If you disagree, please present
your argument so that I can take it back to the pam_unix folks for their
consideration. But
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Tracked as #255
Assorted manpage fixes, found by David during his review of documentation.
* do not mention the sbus_timeout parameter at all
* document the config_file_version parameter
* different wording for negative cache
Jakub
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 11/09/2009 07:55 AM, Brian J. Murrell wrote:
On Thu, 2009-11-05 at 16:27 -0500, Brian J. Murrell wrote:
I didn't see any response to the following. As far as I can see and
have explained this is still a problem. If you disagree, please
On Mon, 2009-11-09 at 08:05 -0500, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
Sorry Brian, we discussed this off-list in #freeipa the other day.
Transcript included here for posterity.
OK...
==
07:51:45 AM) sgallagh: sbose: Unrelated: Do
On Mon, 2009-11-09 at 07:58 -0500, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
If you create an account at https://admin.fedoraproject.org/accounts you
will not be required to validate the captcha.
That's what site (including the https) I am at. Anyway, I seem to have
found one I could actually read.
Brian,
On Mon, Nov 09, 2009 at 07:52:43AM -0500, Brian J. Murrell wrote:
On Mon, 2009-11-09 at 07:33 -0500, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
Brian, can you open a bug at https://fedorahosted.org
I would but I can't make out the stupid captcha and there is no button
to generate a new one! I really hate
Simple one-liner.
Martin
From ad04b74a8e9c60392cda5859e97b151eaeabbad6 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Martin Nagy mn...@redhat.com
Date: Wed, 4 Nov 2009 18:19:31 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] Fix a bad free in async_resolv.c
---
server/resolv/async_resolv.c |2 +-
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+),
On Thu, 2009-11-05 at 15:53 -0500, Simo Sorce wrote:
On Wed, 2009-11-04 at 18:32 +0100, Martin Nagy wrote:
On Mon, 2009-11-02 at 16:02 -0500, Simo Sorce wrote:
On Fri, 2009-10-30 at 14:07 +0100, Martin Nagy wrote:
Hi,
attached are patches needed for the fail over functionality. The
The files tests are broken and don't compile, attached patch fixes that.
Martin
From a37cbc89a167eaf0f8cd5d5e6845f5fe9e3109e3 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Martin Nagy mn...@redhat.com
Date: Fri, 6 Nov 2009 17:48:37 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] Add missing include file to files-tests.c
---
On Mon, Nov 09, 2009 at 08:48:19AM -0500, Brian J. Murrell wrote:
On Mon, 2009-11-09 at 14:34 +0100, Sumit Bose wrote:
Can you send krb5_child.log, too?
Nothing too exciting:
(1257770543) [[sssd[krb5_child[23777 [get_and_save_tgt] (1): 241:
[-1765328191][Credentials cache I/O
On Mon, 2009-11-09 at 07:58 -0500, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
Hmm, this looks incorrect here. Why are we getting child status[0]
and
then no child with pid [23777]
Sumit, do you have any ideas here?
I think that we have concurrent functions using waitpid() for children.
one in sig_cld and
On Mon, 2009-11-09 at 15:13 +0100, Sumit Bose wrote:
This error indicates a short write.
Ahhh. Now that is meaningful to me. :-)
Can you check if a ccache file is
create at all and if yes check the content with klist?
I didn't realize it was the ccache it was complaining about and I
On Mon, 2009-11-09 at 08:59 -0500, Simo Sorce wrote:
If someone opens a bug for that, yes :-)
Done. https://fedorahosted.org/sssd/ticket/266
However keep in mind that I don't care much for what pam_unix does in
any pam target,
That's fair enough, but you have to respect what other pam
On Mon, 2009-11-09 at 15:47 +0100, Sumit Bose wrote:
yes, can you send the log files for the gnome-screensaver case ?
Sure. Nothing new in the krb5_child.log, however, sssd_pam.log:
(1257778320) [sssd[pam]] [accept_fd_handler] (4): Client connected!
(1257778320) [sssd[pam]]
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 11/09/2009 09:56 AM, Brian J. Murrell wrote:
On Mon, 2009-11-09 at 15:47 +0100, Sumit Bose wrote:
yes, can you send the log files for the gnome-screensaver case ?
Sure. Nothing new in the krb5_child.log, however, sssd_pam.log:
On Mon, 2009-11-09 at 09:41 -0500, Brian J. Murrell wrote:
On Mon, 2009-11-09 at 08:59 -0500, Simo Sorce wrote:
If someone opens a bug for that, yes :-)
Done. https://fedorahosted.org/sssd/ticket/266
However keep in mind that I don't care much for what pam_unix does in
any pam
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 11/09/2009 07:23 AM, Martin Nagy wrote:
On Sat, 2009-11-07 at 13:22 -0500, Simo Sorce wrote:
On Sat, 2009-11-07 at 09:47 +0100, Martin Nagy wrote:
Simo Sorce wrote:
if (tevent_req_is_error(req, tstate, err)) {
-return -1;
+
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 11/09/2009 07:36 AM, Sumit Bose wrote:
On Mon, Nov 09, 2009 at 01:20:28PM +0100, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 11/09/2009 12:29 PM, Sumit Bose wrote:
[PATCH 2/2] IPA time rules parsing routines
Adds an
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 11/09/2009 07:53 AM, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
On 11/09/2009 07:36 AM, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
On 11/09/2009 05:11 AM, Sumit Bose wrote:
On Sun, Nov 08, 2009 at 01:19:35AM -0500, Simo Sorce wrote:
Save all entries, not just the first one.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 11/09/2009 08:47 AM, Simo Sorce wrote:
On Mon, 2009-11-09 at 11:23 +0100, Sumit Bose wrote:
On Sat, Nov 07, 2009 at 08:01:39PM -0500, Simo Sorce wrote:
On Sat, 2009-11-07 at 13:24 -0500, Simo Sorce wrote:
Except some rare cases out use of
On Mon, 2009-11-09 at 10:06 -0500, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
Please also attach sssd_KRB5.log. That is more likely to have the
relevant information.
Not at all I'm afraid.
The last timestamp I have in that file is 1257770543 and the last
timestamp of the gnome-screensaver use that I sent
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 11/09/2009 11:14 AM, Simo Sorce wrote:
On Mon, 2009-11-09 at 13:39 +0100, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
Fixes: #261
ack
Pushed to master.
- --
Stephen Gallagher
RHCE 804006346421761
Delivering value year after year.
Red Hat ranks #1 in value among
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 11/09/2009 12:16 PM, Simo Sorce wrote:
On Mon, 2009-11-09 at 12:14 -0500, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
The root cause was that preq-domain was set to NULL, because it
couldn't locate a corresponding domain for this user.
I have reordered this
On Mon, Nov 09, 2009 at 09:56:24AM -0500, Brian J. Murrell wrote:
On Mon, 2009-11-09 at 15:47 +0100, Sumit Bose wrote:
yes, can you send the log files for the gnome-screensaver case ?
Sure. Nothing new in the krb5_child.log, however, sssd_pam.log:
Does this mean you are still seeing
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 11/09/2009 02:20 PM, Simo Sorce wrote:
Ok, so far we have been sort of cheating as we never removed users once
added.
In the last few weeks, part of the work I did with various patches was
in preparation to add this clean-up task in a way
Simo Sorce wrote:
Please update manpages for ldap_purge_cache timeout, as well as the
SSSDConfig API configuration files.
Like for other timeouts I'd like to keep this undocumented for now.
I added the option for the API configuration file.
What's the scope of this preference? Should I
29 matches
Mail list logo
