Re: [SSSD] [PATCH] raise a couple of timeouts

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 11/20/2009 02:48 PM, Stephen Gallagher wrote: > On 11/20/2009 02:22 PM, Simo Sorce wrote: >> They were a bit too strict with high debug levels. > >> Simo. > > Ack. > > A note to QA: when this patch is pushed it will probably cause a lot of > trou

Re: [SSSD] [PATCH] Make use of failover code in backends.

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 11/20/2009 03:56 PM, Sumit Bose wrote: > > I still find it hard to test, but I think the general logic is right. > > ACK > Pushed to master - -- Stephen Gallagher RHCE 804006346421761 Delivering value year after year. Red Hat ranks #1 in valu

Re: [SSSD] [PATCH] Optimize gorup enumerations

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 11/20/2009 01:30 PM, Stephen Gallagher wrote: > > You're welcome. That's why the tests are there. > > Ack. > Pushed to master. - -- Stephen Gallagher RHCE 804006346421761 Delivering value year after year. Red Hat ranks #1 in value among softw

Re: [SSSD] [PATCH] Only display errors in unit tests

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 11/20/2009 12:48 PM, Simo Sorce wrote: > On Fri, 2009-11-20 at 12:18 -0500, Stephen Gallagher wrote: To view output the old (verbose) way, just set >> CK_VERBOSITY=verbose. >>> >>> This time with the patch attached... >>> >> >> This time w

Re: [SSSD] [PATCH] move id range checks into providers

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 11/20/2009 03:54 PM, Stephen Gallagher wrote: > > > I just tested building this. I see no warnings in this code. > > Ack. > Pushed to master. - -- Stephen Gallagher RHCE 804006346421761 Delivering value year after year. Red Hat ranks #1 in v

Re: [SSSD] [PATCH] Enhance check for remote hosts

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 11/20/2009 03:29 PM, Stephen Gallagher wrote: > On 11/16/2009 05:52 AM, Sumit Bose wrote: >> Hi, > >> with this patch the ipa_access target should be functional complete (if >> I haven't forgotten something). It tries to resolve to group membership

Re: [SSSD] [PATCH] raise a couple of timeouts

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 11/20/2009 02:48 PM, Stephen Gallagher wrote: > On 11/20/2009 02:22 PM, Simo Sorce wrote: >> They were a bit too strict with high debug levels. > >> Simo. > > Ack. > > A note to QA: when this patch is pushed it will probably cause a lot of > trou

Re: [SSSD] [PATCH] Add ipa_auth

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 11/20/2009 02:49 PM, Stephen Gallagher wrote: > On 11/09/2009 05:35 PM, Sumit Bose wrote: >> Hi, > >> this patch adds a separate IPA authentication target which glues together >> Kerberos and LDAP authentication to support IPA password migration. >

Re: [SSSD] [PATCH] Read KDC info from file instead from environment

On Thu, 2009-11-19 at 18:32 +0100, Sumit Bose wrote: > Hi, > > this patch changes the way the locator plugin finds out about the KDC. > Now the information is written to a file which is read by the plugin. > > Two thing will be address in different patches. > > - the enviroment variables are sti

Re: [SSSD] [PATCH] Make use of failover code in backends.

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 11/20/2009 12:14 PM, Simo Sorce wrote: > On Fri, 2009-11-20 at 10:03 -0500, Simo Sorce wrote: >> ok, >> modified patch attached. > > Rebased on top of current master. > > Simo. Ack - -- Stephen Gallagher RHCE 804006346421761 Delivering value y

Re: [SSSD] [PATCH] Make use of failover code in backends.

On Fri, Nov 20, 2009 at 12:14:22PM -0500, Simo Sorce wrote: > On Fri, 2009-11-20 at 10:03 -0500, Simo Sorce wrote: > > ok, > > modified patch attached. > > Rebased on top of current master. > > Simo. > I still find it hard to test, but I think the general logic is right. ACK bye, Sumit __

Re: [SSSD] [PATCH] move id range checks into providers

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 11/20/2009 03:49 PM, Simo Sorce wrote: > This is because you applied this patch before the enumgrent optimization > one. That patch removes the uid and comes before this patch in my tree. > > Simo. > I just tested building this. I see no warnings

Re: [SSSD] [PATCH] move id range checks into providers

On Fri, 2009-11-20 at 21:35 +0100, Sumit Bose wrote: > On Fri, Nov 20, 2009 at 01:36:30PM -0500, Simo Sorce wrote: > > On Fri, 2009-11-20 at 10:40 +0100, Sumit Bose wrote: > > > Works well, especially with Optimize-sysdb_enumgrent.patch, but > > > please create a utility function or a macro for the

Re: [SSSD] [PATCH] move id range checks into providers

On Fri, Nov 20, 2009 at 01:36:30PM -0500, Simo Sorce wrote: > On Fri, 2009-11-20 at 10:40 +0100, Sumit Bose wrote: > > Works well, especially with Optimize-sysdb_enumgrent.patch, but > > please create a utility function or a macro for the range check and > > fix > > Revised patch to use a macro. >

Re: [SSSD] [PATCH] Enhance check for remote hosts

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 11/16/2009 05:52 AM, Sumit Bose wrote: > Hi, > > with this patch the ipa_access target should be functional complete (if > I haven't forgotten something). It tries to resolve to group memberships > of the remote host and checks the hbac rule agains

Re: [SSSD] ELAPI fundamental architectural issue

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 11/20/2009 03:07 PM, Dmitri Pal wrote: > > I was thinking this way too but Steve brought a point that the > application might want to use the sync interface in this case exactly > for the reason of bypassing its main loop and sending the event righ

Re: [SSSD] ELAPI fundamental architectural issue

> No I think that apps that use mixed async and sycn logging do so only > when sending a sync log requires it to know the operation went through. > Ok so I will add a queue at the beginning... Ohh. More complexity and more work... > In that case the application is prepared to wait the time it

Re: [SSSD] [PATCH] Ignore shadow attributes

On Mon, Nov 16, 2009 at 09:23:17AM -0500, Simo Sorce wrote: > On Mon, 2009-11-16 at 14:06 +0100, Sumit Bose wrote: > > Hi, > > > > this patch should fix #279 by ignoring the shadow attributes by > > default. > > I was thinking about this and I think I don't want to go down this way. > While autom

Re: [SSSD] [PATCH] raise a couple of timeouts

Stephen Gallagher wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > On 11/20/2009 02:22 PM, Simo Sorce wrote: > >> They were a bit too strict with high debug levels. >> >> Simo. >> > > Ack. > > A note to QA: when this patch is pushed it will probably cause a lot of > trouble with

Re: [SSSD] ELAPI fundamental architectural issue

On Fri, 2009-11-20 at 14:27 -0500, Dmitri Pal wrote: > If I understand you correctly you agree that having an internal queue > is > the right approach. > > Do you agree with the recommendation to use different dispatchers if > application wants to log sync and async events at the same time? No. I

Re: [SSSD] [PATCH] Add ipa_auth

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 11/09/2009 05:35 PM, Sumit Bose wrote: > Hi, > > this patch adds a separate IPA authentication target which glues together > Kerberos and LDAP authentication to support IPA password migration. Ack - -- Stephen Gallagher RHCE 804006346421761 Del

Re: [SSSD] [PATCH] raise a couple of timeouts

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 11/20/2009 02:22 PM, Simo Sorce wrote: > They were a bit too strict with high debug levels. > > Simo. Ack. A note to QA: when this patch is pushed it will probably cause a lot of trouble with the tests. It may be up to 10 seconds before the SSSD

Re: [SSSD] ELAPI fundamental architectural issue

Simo Sorce wrote: > On Fri, 2009-11-20 at 12:50 -0500, Dmitri Pal wrote: > >> b) Hold the events in queue inside ELAPI dispatcher and let them go >> through the whole sink chain only one at a time. In this case there >> will >> be only one event traveling the callbacks at a time. This approach >

[SSSD] [PATCH] raise a couple of timeouts

They were a bit too strict with high debug levels. Simo. -- Simo Sorce * Red Hat, Inc * New York >From bcd36543f40ac48f944970735eddfd37f9cf9ab6 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Simo Sorce Date: Fri, 20 Nov 2009 14:19:35 -0500 Subject: [PATCH] Raise some timeouts When using high debug levels or v

Re: [SSSD] [PATCH] move id range checks into providers

On Fri, 2009-11-20 at 10:40 +0100, Sumit Bose wrote: > Works well, especially with Optimize-sysdb_enumgrent.patch, but > please create a utility function or a macro for the range check and > fix Revised patch to use a macro. -- Simo Sorce * Red Hat, Inc * New York >From 723f6d0750ea952b1b4ec3c92

Re: [SSSD] [PATCH] Optimize gorup enumerations

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 11/20/2009 12:49 PM, Simo Sorce wrote: > > Thanks for catching this, it unveiled a serious error. > > Attached patch that correctly passes all tests. > > Simo. > You're welcome. That's why the tests are there. Ack. - -- Stephen Gallagher RHC

Re: [SSSD] ELAPI fundamental architectural issue

On Fri, 2009-11-20 at 12:50 -0500, Dmitri Pal wrote: > b) Hold the events in queue inside ELAPI dispatcher and let them go > through the whole sink chain only one at a time. In this case there > will > be only one event traveling the callbacks at a time. This approach > though avoids the blocking o

[SSSD] ELAPI fundamental architectural issue

Hi, I am pretty close to having ELAPI based on the async processing to at least building. This means that I finally embraced the logic or async programming and managed to understand what should be done where and how. Big progress I should say. So... The events now can be created and logged asynchr

Re: [SSSD] [PATCH] Optimize gorup enumerations

On Fri, 2009-11-20 at 11:16 -0500, Stephen Gallagher wrote: > Nack > You broke the sysdb tests > > ../../server/tests/sysdb-tests.c:1758:F:SYSDB > Tests:test_sysdb_get_user_attr:27010: [5]: Could not get attributes > for > user testuser27010 [..] Thanks for catching this, it unveiled a serious er

Re: [SSSD] [PATCH] Only display errors in unit tests

On Fri, 2009-11-20 at 12:18 -0500, Stephen Gallagher wrote: > >> To view output the old (verbose) way, just set > CK_VERBOSITY=verbose. > >> > > > > This time with the patch attached... > > > > This time with the RIGHT patch attached... ACK, although it seem like collection tests do not obey th

Re: [SSSD] [PATCH] Only display errors in unit tests

On 11/20/2009 12:14 PM, Stephen Gallagher wrote: > On 11/20/2009 12:13 PM, Stephen Gallagher wrote: >> >> Self-nack. >> The better way to do this is with CK_ENV which will take the value of >> the environment variable CK_VERBOSITY or default to CK_NORMAL (which >> only prints the summary and errors

Re: [SSSD] [PATCH] Only display errors in unit tests

On 11/20/2009 12:13 PM, Stephen Gallagher wrote: > > Self-nack. > The better way to do this is with CK_ENV which will take the value of > the environment variable CK_VERBOSITY or default to CK_NORMAL (which > only prints the summary and errors) > > To view output the old (verbose) way, just set C

Re: [SSSD] [PATCH] Make use of failover code in backends.

On Fri, 2009-11-20 at 10:03 -0500, Simo Sorce wrote: > ok, > modified patch attached. Rebased on top of current master. Simo. -- Simo Sorce * Red Hat, Inc * New York >From 623b66a6817c4b87eefddb2d0f2591d18b16ba76 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Simo Sorce Date: Fri, 20 Nov 2009 12:11:28 -0500 S

Re: [SSSD] [PATCH] Only display errors in unit tests

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 11/20/2009 12:03 PM, Stephen Gallagher wrote: > This patch cuts down the output for the unit tests, so they only display > errors instead of both error and success statements. > > This will make it easier to discover what went wrong. Self-nack. Th

[SSSD] [PATCH] Only display errors in unit tests

This patch cuts down the output for the unit tests, so they only display errors instead of both error and success statements. This will make it easier to discover what went wrong. -- Stephen Gallagher RHCE 804006346421761 Delivering value year after year. Red Hat ranks #1 in value among software

Re: [SSSD] [PATCH] man page fix

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 11/20/2009 10:18 AM, Stephen Gallagher wrote: > On 11/20/2009 10:16 AM, Simo Sorce wrote: >> Trivial man page fix. > >> Simo. > > > > >> ___ >> sssd-devel mailing list >> sssd-devel@lists.fedorahosted

Re: [SSSD] [PATCH] Add empty NL translation

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 11/20/2009 10:11 AM, Simo Sorce wrote: > On Thu, 2009-11-19 at 09:20 -0500, Stephen Gallagher wrote: >> $SUBJECT > > ACK > Pushed to master. - -- Stephen Gallagher RHCE 804006346421761 Delivering value year after year. Red Hat ranks #1 in val

Re: [SSSD] [PATCH] Improve handling of ccache files

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 11/20/2009 09:55 AM, Stephen Gallagher wrote: > On 11/20/2009 08:41 AM, Sumit Bose wrote: >> On Thu, Nov 19, 2009 at 02:31:36PM +0100, Sumit Bose wrote: >>> Hi, >>> >>> this patch improves the handling of ccache files. It addresses two >>> issues al

Re: [SSSD] [PATCH] correctly escape RDNs

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 11/20/2009 09:17 AM, Sumit Bose wrote: > On Fri, Nov 20, 2009 at 09:07:31AM -0500, Simo Sorce wrote: >> On Fri, 2009-11-20 at 09:50 +0100, Sumit Bose wrote: >>> On Thu, Nov 19, 2009 at 07:30:32PM -0500, Simo Sorce wrote: See commit comment. >>>

Re: [SSSD] [PATCHES] Use ipachangeconf in the upgrade script

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 11/20/2009 08:42 AM, Stephen Gallagher wrote: > On 11/20/2009 08:32 AM, Jakub Hrozek wrote: >> On 11/20/2009 01:54 PM, Stephen Gallagher wrote: [PATCH 6/6] upgrade_config fixes for SSSD 0.6 and later > Incorporates changes we made to v2 aft

Re: [SSSD] [PATCH] better cleanup task for ldap driver

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 11/20/2009 08:11 AM, Stephen Gallagher wrote: > On 11/19/2009 05:36 PM, Simo Sorce wrote: >> On Thu, 2009-11-19 at 08:55 -0500, Simo Sorce wrote: >>> On Thu, 2009-11-19 at 09:18 +0100, Sumit Bose wrote: On Wed, Nov 18, 2009 at 07:23:09PM -0500,

Re: [SSSD] [PATCH] Validate Kerberos cerdentials with local keytab

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 11/19/2009 09:22 AM, Stephen Gallagher wrote: > On 11/19/2009 07:58 AM, Sumit Bose wrote: >> On Wed, Nov 18, 2009 at 05:13:30PM -0500, Stephen Gallagher wrote: >> On 11/13/2009 09:29 AM, Sumit Bose wrote: > On Thu, Nov 12, 2009 at 01:46:39PM -05

Re: [SSSD] [PATCH] Optimize gorup enumerations

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 11/20/2009 05:16 AM, Sumit Bose wrote: > On Tue, Nov 17, 2009 at 08:38:00PM -0500, Simo Sorce wrote: >> I've been thinking about optimizing group enumerations for a while as >> they were way too slow for my taste. >> >> I did that by relying on the

Re: [SSSD] [PATCH] man page fix

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 11/20/2009 10:16 AM, Simo Sorce wrote: > Trivial man page fix. > > Simo. > > > > > ___ > sssd-devel mailing list > sssd-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org > https://fedorahosted.org/mailman/listinfo/sssd-de

[SSSD] [PATCH] man page fix

Trivial man page fix. Simo. -- Simo Sorce * Red Hat, Inc * New York >From c1b86765854124e37e1898f3861c53ac5a818cf7 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Simo Sorce Date: Fri, 20 Nov 2009 10:14:40 -0500 Subject: [PATCH] Add reference to sssd-krb5 man page. Thanks to Marko Myllynen for spotting this. -

Re: [SSSD] [PATCH] Add empty NL translation

On Thu, 2009-11-19 at 09:20 -0500, Stephen Gallagher wrote: > $SUBJECT ACK -- Simo Sorce * Red Hat, Inc * New York ___ sssd-devel mailing list sssd-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org https://fedorahosted.org/mailman/listinfo/sssd-devel

Re: [SSSD] [PATCH] Make use of failover code in backends.

On Fri, 2009-11-20 at 15:16 +0100, Sumit Bose wrote: > On Fri, Nov 20, 2009 at 08:59:49AM -0500, Simo Sorce wrote: > > On Fri, 2009-11-20 at 12:23 +0100, Sumit Bose wrote: > > > On Mon, Nov 16, 2009 at 05:55:51PM -0500, Simo Sorce wrote: > > > > This patch implements the use of the fail_over code u

Re: [SSSD] [PATCH] Improve handling of ccache files

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 11/20/2009 08:41 AM, Sumit Bose wrote: > On Thu, Nov 19, 2009 at 02:31:36PM +0100, Sumit Bose wrote: >> Hi, >> >> this patch improves the handling of ccache files. It addresses two >> issues already discussed on the list. >> >> When randomized ccach

Re: [SSSD] [PATCH] correctly escape RDNs

On Fri, Nov 20, 2009 at 09:07:31AM -0500, Simo Sorce wrote: > On Fri, 2009-11-20 at 09:50 +0100, Sumit Bose wrote: > > On Thu, Nov 19, 2009 at 07:30:32PM -0500, Simo Sorce wrote: > > > See commit comment. > > > > > > -- > > > Simo Sorce * Red Hat, Inc * New York > > > > > >From 49862816e3b7077bc

Re: [SSSD] [PATCH] Make use of failover code in backends.

On Fri, Nov 20, 2009 at 08:59:49AM -0500, Simo Sorce wrote: > On Fri, 2009-11-20 at 12:23 +0100, Sumit Bose wrote: > > On Mon, Nov 16, 2009 at 05:55:51PM -0500, Simo Sorce wrote: > > > This patch implements the use of the fail_over code under the control of > > > the data provider backend code. All

Re: [SSSD] [PATCH] correctly escape RDNs

On Fri, 2009-11-20 at 09:50 +0100, Sumit Bose wrote: > On Thu, Nov 19, 2009 at 07:30:32PM -0500, Simo Sorce wrote: > > See commit comment. > > > > -- > > Simo Sorce * Red Hat, Inc * New York > > > >From 49862816e3b7077bc7a002c980901d31aff06269 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 > > From: Simo Sorce > > D

Re: [SSSD] [PATCH] move id range checks into providers

On Fri, 2009-11-20 at 11:19 +0100, Sumit Bose wrote: > On Fri, Nov 20, 2009 at 10:40:29AM +0100, Sumit Bose wrote: > > On Wed, Nov 18, 2009 at 12:09:58PM -0500, Simo Sorce wrote: > > > This way we check them once at storage time instead of checking again > > > and again at search time. > > > > > >

Re: [SSSD] [PATCH] Make use of failover code in backends.

On Fri, 2009-11-20 at 12:23 +0100, Sumit Bose wrote: > On Mon, Nov 16, 2009 at 05:55:51PM -0500, Simo Sorce wrote: > > This patch implements the use of the fail_over code under the control of > > the data provider backend code. All providers share the same failover > > structure and if they use the

Re: [SSSD] [PATCHES] Use ipachangeconf in the upgrade script

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 11/20/2009 08:32 AM, Jakub Hrozek wrote: > On 11/20/2009 01:54 PM, Stephen Gallagher wrote: >>> [PATCH 6/6] upgrade_config fixes for SSSD 0.6 and later Incorporates changes we made to v2 after 0.6, or that were missed by the original upgra

Re: [SSSD] [PATCH] Improve handling of ccache files

On Thu, Nov 19, 2009 at 02:31:36PM +0100, Sumit Bose wrote: > Hi, > > this patch improves the handling of ccache files. It addresses two > issues already discussed on the list. > > When randomized ccache file are used (or the client process id is used > in the name of the ccache file) each authen

Re: [SSSD] [PATCHES] Use ipachangeconf in the upgrade script

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 11/20/2009 01:54 PM, Stephen Gallagher wrote: >> [PATCH 6/6] upgrade_config fixes for SSSD 0.6 and later >> > Incorporates changes we made to v2 after 0.6, or that were missed by the >> > original upgrade script: >> > * removes magic_private_groups

Re: [SSSD] [PATCH] better cleanup task for ldap driver

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 11/19/2009 05:36 PM, Simo Sorce wrote: > On Thu, 2009-11-19 at 08:55 -0500, Simo Sorce wrote: >> On Thu, 2009-11-19 at 09:18 +0100, Sumit Bose wrote: >>> On Wed, Nov 18, 2009 at 07:23:09PM -0500, Simo Sorce wrote: See the commit comment, b

Re: [SSSD] [PATCHES] Use ipachangeconf in the upgrade script

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 11/19/2009 02:45 PM, Jakub Hrozek wrote: > On 11/17/2009 04:16 PM, Jakub Hrozek wrote: >> On 11/17/2009 12:16 PM, Jakub Hrozek wrote: >>> On 11/17/2009 01:06 AM, Jakub Hrozek wrote: [PATCH 1/2] Add Simo's ipachangeconf This patch adds the

Re: [SSSD] [PATCH] Make use of failover code in backends.

On Mon, Nov 16, 2009 at 05:55:51PM -0500, Simo Sorce wrote: > This patch implements the use of the fail_over code under the control of > the data provider backend code. All providers share the same failover > structure and if they use the same service name, they also share the > same servers lists.

Re: [SSSD] [PATCH] move id range checks into providers

On Fri, Nov 20, 2009 at 10:40:29AM +0100, Sumit Bose wrote: > On Wed, Nov 18, 2009 at 12:09:58PM -0500, Simo Sorce wrote: > > This way we check them once at storage time instead of checking again > > and again at search time. > > > > Applies only on top of the sysdb_enumgrent optimization patch. >

Re: [SSSD] [PATCH] Optimize gorup enumerations

On Tue, Nov 17, 2009 at 08:38:00PM -0500, Simo Sorce wrote: > I've been thinking about optimizing group enumerations for a while as > they were way too slow for my taste. > > I did that by relying on the way we store users in the database and by > parsing the member attribute of the groups countin

Re: [SSSD] [PATCH] move id range checks into providers

On Wed, Nov 18, 2009 at 12:09:58PM -0500, Simo Sorce wrote: > This way we check them once at storage time instead of checking again > and again at search time. > > Applies only on top of the sysdb_enumgrent optimization patch. > > Simo. > Works well, especially with Optimize-sysdb_enumgrent.pat

Re: [SSSD] [PATCH] correctly escape RDNs

On Thu, Nov 19, 2009 at 07:30:32PM -0500, Simo Sorce wrote: > See commit comment. > > -- > Simo Sorce * Red Hat, Inc * New York > >From 49862816e3b7077bc7a002c980901d31aff06269 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 > From: Simo Sorce > Date: Thu, 19 Nov 2009 19:28:36 -0500 > Subject: [PATCH] Correctly escap