1. No facility for renaming a group? e.g. groupmod -n
2. No facility for creating multiple groups? (Actually in a separate
email with examples, but no replies yet)
3. No facility to remove a user from a group if that group membership is
by way of nested groups? I don't know if this is somethi
On Wed, Dec 9, 2009 at 8:16 PM, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> > Is this something you want me to be looking into or is it
> > developer-level only?
> >
>
> developer-level only, this patch adds the capability to operate on some
> LDAP and Kerberos knobs
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
> Is this something you want me to be looking into or is it
> developer-level only?
>
developer-level only, this patch adds the capability to operate on some
LDAP and Kerberos knobs with the config API.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v
Simo Sorce wrote:
> On Wed, 2009-12-09 at 11:21 -0500, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
>> The SSSDConfig API only listed the options specific to the IPA
>> provider,
>> but it should be possible to tweak all of the LDAP and KRB5 options
>> individually as well.
>
> ack.
>
> although we should doc which
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
There were two functions for parsing strings by a separator. This patch
consolidates on the one previously used in confdb. This also allows
stripping the tokens of whitespace.
Fixes: #319
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 12/09/2009 03:18 PM, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> On 12/09/2009 03:03 PM, transi...@gmail.com wrote:
>> Hello sssd, this is Transifex at http://www.transifex.net.
>
>> The following attached files were submitted to SSSD | master by goeran
>>
>
>>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 12/09/2009 03:03 PM, transi...@gmail.com wrote:
> Hello sssd, this is Transifex at http://www.transifex.net.
>
> The following attached files were submitted to SSSD | master by goeran
>
>
> Please, visit Transifex at http://www.transifex.net/pr
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 12/09/2009 02:26 PM, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> On 12/09/2009 12:21 PM, Sumit Bose wrote:
>> Hi,
>
>> this is a quick fix for #285 by calling sysdb_upgrade_03() after
>> sysdb_upgrade_02() is done. I'm thinking of refactoring all the upgrade
>> cal
On Wed, 2009-12-09 at 14:18 -0500, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> Somehow we had forgotten to ensure that the sssd-ipa.conf file was
> installed by 'make install', thus rendering SSSDConfig incapable of
> configuring IPA domains.
>
> This patch corrects that omission.
ACK
Simo.
--
Simo Sorce * Red
Hello sssd, this is Transifex at http://www.transifex.net.
The following attached files were submitted to SSSD | master by goeran
Please, visit Transifex at http://www.transifex.net/projects/p/sssd/c/master/
in order to see the component page.
Thank you,
Transifex
# Swedish messages for sssd
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 12/07/2009 09:51 AM, Dmitri Pal wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Please find a series of patches related to $subj.
>
> 0001 - Trace improvements. See patch comments. (independent patch)
Ack
> 0003 - Collection enhancements needed for ELAPI
Ack.
> 0006 - Clean
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 12/09/2009 12:21 PM, Sumit Bose wrote:
> Hi,
>
> this is a quick fix for #285 by calling sysdb_upgrade_03() after
> sysdb_upgrade_02() is done. I'm thinking of refactoring all the upgrade
> calls into one function which can be called multiple time
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Somehow we had forgotten to ensure that the sssd-ipa.conf file was
installed by 'make install', thus rendering SSSDConfig incapable of
configuring IPA domains.
This patch corrects that omission.
- --
Stephen Gallagher
RHCE 804006346421761
Delivering
Hi,
this is a quick fix for #285 by calling sysdb_upgrade_03() after
sysdb_upgrade_02() is done. I'm thinking of refactoring all the upgrade
calls into one function which can be called multiple time from different
places of the code, but for the time being I think the patch is
sufficient.
bye,
Su
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 12/09/2009 11:29 AM, Simo Sorce wrote:
> On Wed, 2009-12-09 at 11:21 -0500, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
>> The SSSDConfig API only listed the options specific to the IPA
>> provider,
>> but it should be possible to tweak all of the LDAP and KRB5 option
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 12/09/2009 11:39 AM, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> On 12/09/2009 10:01 AM, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
>> On 12/09/2009 09:47 AM, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
>>> On 12/09/2009 08:13 AM, Sumit Bose wrote:
On Wed, Dec 09, 2009 at 07:11:52AM -0500, Stephen
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 12/09/2009 10:01 AM, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> On 12/09/2009 09:47 AM, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
>> On 12/09/2009 08:13 AM, Sumit Bose wrote:
>>> On Wed, Dec 09, 2009 at 07:11:52AM -0500, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
>>> See $SUBJECT
>
>
>>> I have ad
On Wed, 2009-12-09 at 11:21 -0500, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> The SSSDConfig API only listed the options specific to the IPA
> provider,
> but it should be possible to tweak all of the LDAP and KRB5 options
> individually as well.
ack.
although we should doc which options are actually honored whe
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
The SSSDConfig API only listed the options specific to the IPA provider,
but it should be possible to tweak all of the LDAP and KRB5 options
individually as well.
- --
Stephen Gallagher
RHCE 804006346421761
Delivering value year after year.
Red Hat
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 12/09/2009 03:35 AM, Martin Nagy wrote:
> On Tue, 2009-12-08 at 20:43 +0100, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
>> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
>> Hash: SHA1
>>
>> On 12/08/2009 07:53 PM, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
>>> Thank you for the review, the issues should be
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 12/09/2009 09:19 AM, Simo Sorce wrote:
> On Wed, 2009-12-09 at 09:15 -0500, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
>> Fixes https://fedorahosted.org/sssd/ticket/233
>>
>> The previous patch had the check in the wrong location. It needs to be
>> in confdb_get_doma
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 12/09/2009 09:19 AM, Simo Sorce wrote:
> On Wed, 2009-12-09 at 15:02 +0100, Martin Nagy wrote:
>> So, when I tried to fix #302, I first thought the problem was that
>> there
>> was no feedback to mark servers as working, plus I discovered that
>> th
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 12/09/2009 08:58 AM, Martin Nagy wrote:
> These were very useful for debugging and hopefully still will be in the
> future.
>
> Martin
>
Ack and pushed to master.
- --
Stephen Gallagher
RHCE 804006346421761
Delivering value year after year.
Re
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 12/09/2009 08:52 AM, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> On 12/09/2009 08:20 AM, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
>> Previously, we were accidentally filtering out domains that were
>> not configured, so deleted domains might still appear in the
>> active domain lis
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 12/09/2009 08:51 AM, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> On 12/09/2009 07:43 AM, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
>> When getting a domain from the configuration, we weren't checking if it
>> was in the active list, and it defaults to inactive.
>
>> This patch will
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 12/09/2009 08:51 AM, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> On 12/09/2009 07:11 AM, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
>> deactivate_domain() would crash if it attempted to deactivate an
>> already-inactive domain
>
>> This makes it tolerant of double-deactivations.
>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 12/09/2009 06:56 AM, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> On 12/09/2009 06:52 AM, Martin Nagy wrote:
>> The make rpms target is broken, see the patch text:
>
>> We were actually listing files that are on the system, not those that we
>> created in the $RPM_B
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 12/09/2009 05:08 AM, Sumit Bose wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 08, 2009 at 08:52:57PM +0100, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
> Fixes: #294
> works fine for me,
> ACK
> bye,
> Sumit
Pushed to master.
- --
Stephen Gallagher
RHCE 804006346421761
Delivering value year
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 12/09/2009 03:40 AM, Martin Nagy wrote:
> On Tue, 2009-12-08 at 13:35 -0500, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
>> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
>> Hash: SHA1
>>
>> Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6 will eventuall be based on Fedora. Currently
>> our spec file
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 12/09/2009 09:47 AM, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> On 12/09/2009 08:13 AM, Sumit Bose wrote:
>> On Wed, Dec 09, 2009 at 07:11:52AM -0500, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
>> See $SUBJECT
>
>
>> I have added some missing trailing spaces and (hopefully) fixed
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 12/09/2009 08:13 AM, Sumit Bose wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 09, 2009 at 07:11:52AM -0500, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> See $SUBJECT
>
> I have added some missing trailing spaces and (hopefully) fixed the
> non-acsii utf-8 characters.
> bye,
> Sumit
Ack.
Ok, i'll do this.
2009/12/9 Sumit Bose :
> On Wed, Dec 09, 2009 at 02:21:05PM +0300, Sergei V. Kovylov wrote:
>> Here you may find a patch for sssd.spec file which provide correct
>> build sssd for SLES (testes on SLES10SP1).
>> In brief:
>> There are 3 essences:
>> redhat
>> fedora
>> sles
>> whi
On Wed, 2009-12-09 at 09:15 -0500, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> Fixes https://fedorahosted.org/sssd/ticket/233
>
> The previous patch had the check in the wrong location. It needs to be
> in confdb_get_domains() so it happens before the monitor daemonizes.
ack
Simo.
--
Simo Sorce * Red Hat, Inc
On Wed, 2009-12-09 at 15:02 +0100, Martin Nagy wrote:
> So, when I tried to fix #302, I first thought the problem was that
> there
> was no feedback to mark servers as working, plus I discovered that
> there
> are some missing status sets in the fail over code itself. However,
> the
> truth was tha
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Fixes https://fedorahosted.org/sssd/ticket/233
The previous patch had the check in the wrong location. It needs to be
in confdb_get_domains() so it happens before the monitor daemonizes.
- --
Stephen Gallagher
RHCE 804006346421761
Delivering value y
So, when I tried to fix #302, I first thought the problem was that there
was no feedback to mark servers as working, plus I discovered that there
are some missing status sets in the fail over code itself. However, the
truth was that the problem was much simpler than that, attached patch
fixes it. T
These were very useful for debugging and hopefully still will be in the
future.
Martin
>From c67a854ffeb36db5d28e1182a14018ec99cf37e0 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Martin Nagy
Date: Tue, 8 Dec 2009 19:26:50 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] Add some debugging statements to fail_over and resolver
These wer
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 12/09/2009 08:20 AM, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> Previously, we were accidentally filtering out domains that were
> not configured, so deleted domains might still appear in the
> active domain list.
>
> This patch should ensure that this never happe
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 12/09/2009 07:43 AM, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> When getting a domain from the configuration, we weren't checking if it
> was in the active list, and it defaults to inactive.
>
> This patch will ensure that we set the appropriate active state.
Ack
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 12/09/2009 07:11 AM, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> deactivate_domain() would crash if it attempted to deactivate an
> already-inactive domain
>
> This makes it tolerant of double-deactivations.
>
> The patch also adds a set of unit tests for both act
On Wed, Dec 09, 2009 at 02:21:05PM +0300, Sergei V. Kovylov wrote:
> Here you may find a patch for sssd.spec file which provide correct
> build sssd for SLES (testes on SLES10SP1).
> In brief:
> There are 3 essences:
> redhat
> fedora
> sles
> which are detected by /etc/ existence (ex.
> /etc/SuSE
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Previously, we were accidentally filtering out domains that were
not configured, so deleted domains might still appear in the
active domain list.
This patch should ensure that this never happens.
This also fixes a bug where renaming a domain that was
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 12/09/2009 08:16 AM, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> The attached patch should fix the problem with the old domain remaining
> in the active list.
>
Sorry, that was sent as a reply to the wrong message. I will start a new
thread for this patch.
- --
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
The attached patch should fix the problem with the old domain remaining
in the active list.
- --
Stephen Gallagher
RHCE 804006346421761
Delivering value year after year.
Red Hat ranks #1 in value among software vendors.
http://www.redhat.com/promo/v
On Wed, Dec 09, 2009 at 07:11:52AM -0500, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> See $SUBJECT
>
> - --
> Stephen Gallagher
> RHCE 804006346421761
>
> Delivering value year after year.
> Red Hat ranks #1 in value among software vendors.
> http://www.redhat
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
When getting a domain from the configuration, we weren't checking if it
was in the active list, and it defaults to inactive.
This patch will ensure that we set the appropriate active state.
- --
Stephen Gallagher
RHCE 804006346421761
Delivering valu
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
See $SUBJECT
- --
Stephen Gallagher
RHCE 804006346421761
Delivering value year after year.
Red Hat ranks #1 in value among software vendors.
http://www.redhat.com/promo/vendor/
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)
Comment
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
deactivate_domain() would crash if it attempted to deactivate an
already-inactive domain
This makes it tolerant of double-deactivations.
The patch also adds a set of unit tests for both activate_domain() and
deactivate_domain()
- --
Stephen Gallaghe
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 12/09/2009 05:33 AM, transi...@gmail.com wrote:
> Hello sssd, this is Transifex at http://www.transifex.net.
>
> The following attached files were submitted to SSSD | master by fgonz
>
>
> Please, visit Transifex at http://www.transifex.net/pro
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 12/09/2009 03:58 AM, transi...@gmail.com wrote:
> Hello sssd, this is Transifex at http://www.transifex.net.
>
> The following attached files were submitted to SSSD | master by fgonz
>
>
> Please, visit Transifex at http://www.transifex.net/pro
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 12/09/2009 06:52 AM, Martin Nagy wrote:
> The make rpms target is broken, see the patch text:
>
> We were actually listing files that are on the system, not those that we
> created in the $RPM_BUILD_ROOT. Also, by doing an echo with the regular
> e
The make rpms target is broken, see the patch text:
We were actually listing files that are on the system, not those that we
created in the $RPM_BUILD_ROOT. Also, by doing an echo with the regular
expression, we put more than one file on one line. Rpmbuild doesn't like
that and will not generate t
Here you may find a patch for sssd.spec file which provide correct
build sssd for SLES (testes on SLES10SP1).
In brief:
There are 3 essences:
redhat
fedora
sles
which are detected by /etc/ existence (ex.
/etc/SuSE-release) in spec and all necessary actions are doing along
the OS detection.
Additio
Hello sssd, this is Transifex at http://www.transifex.net.
The following attached files were submitted to SSSD | master by fgonz
Please, visit Transifex at http://www.transifex.net/projects/p/sssd/c/master/
in order to see the component page.
Thank you,
Transifex
# English translations for s
Hello sssd, this is Transifex at http://www.transifex.net.
The following attached files were submitted to SSSD | master by fab
Please, visit Transifex at http://www.transifex.net/projects/p/sssd/c/master/
in order to see the component page.
Thank you,
Transifex
# German translation of SSSd c
Hello sssd, this is Transifex at http://www.transifex.net.
The following attached files were submitted to SSSD | master by fab
Please, visit Transifex at http://www.transifex.net/projects/p/sssd/c/master/
in order to see the component page.
Thank you,
Transifex
# German translation of sssd.
On Tue, Dec 08, 2009 at 08:52:57PM +0100, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Fixes: #294
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
> Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)
> Comment: Using GnuPG with Fedora - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
>
> iEYEARECAAYFAkserpAACgkQHsardTL
Hello sssd, this is Transifex at http://www.transifex.net.
The following attached files were submitted to SSSD | master by fgonz
Please, visit Transifex at http://www.transifex.net/projects/p/sssd/c/master/
in order to see the component page.
Thank you,
Transifex
# English translations for s
Hello sssd, this is Transifex at http://www.transifex.net.
The following attached files were submitted to SSSD | master by fgonz
Please, visit Transifex at http://www.transifex.net/projects/p/sssd/c/master/
in order to see the component page.
Thank you,
Transifex
# English translations for s
On Tue, 2009-12-08 at 13:35 -0500, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6 will eventuall be based on Fedora. Currently
> our spec file treats all versions of RHEL the same. This will cause it
> to fail on RHEL6.
Ack.
Martin
_
On Tue, 2009-12-08 at 20:43 +0100, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On 12/08/2009 07:53 PM, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
> > Thank you for the review, the issues should be fixed now.
>
> Two more small fixes - clean up when talloc fails and fix one bad typo
> (comp
61 matches
Mail list logo
