On Sat, 27 Feb 2010 17:37:27 -0500
Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> Simo, see my recent patch to add a --with-test-dir. If you set this
> to /dev/shm, it increases performance immensely.
>
Yes, I've seen that, but NOSYNC seem a better way then hacking up a RAM
disk ... we may even think of adding a p
Simo, see my recent patch to add a --with-test-dir. If you set this
to /dev/shm, it increases performance immensely.
On Feb 27, 2010, at 4:36 PM, Simo Sorce wrote:
>
> I hadn't run make check in a while while and today I discovered it was
> horrendously slow. The problem lies almost entirely in
I hadn't run make check in a while while and today I discovered it was
horrendously slow. The problem lies almost entirely in the fact that we
use fsync a lot in all tests, this is because we want a "safe" behavior
for our DB, so that a system crash will not also crash the db
consistency and, at m
While looking at the code I found this mismatch.
The error is mostly cosmetic, but it's an error nonetheless.
Simo.
--
Simo Sorce * Red Hat, Inc * New York
>From fe86826a2ad9f586e532fedce5ffc872a1311c32 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Simo Sorce
Date: Sat, 27 Feb 2010 15:14:52 -0500
Subject: [P
