-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 03/04/2010 06:50 PM, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> Jakub, I think you may have sent the wrong patch. 0001 does not apply
> cleanly on top of the current master. Please check your rebase.
Sorry for the inconvenience, it looks I have sent the first patc
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 03/04/2010 06:27 PM, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
> The attached patch also moves the localhost test into the networked
> tests so we can safely build on systems that lack the localhost
> definition in /etc/hosts.
>
> Also prints a warning when running in n
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 03/02/2010 10:00 AM, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
> On 02/26/2010 05:33 PM, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
>> Nack.
>
>> This is partly my fault. update_monitor_config() is broken and
>> dangerous. I thought I had disabled all access to it. I didn't realize
>> it
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 03/04/2010 06:43 AM, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
> On 03/03/2010 09:32 PM, Simo Sorce wrote:
>
>> See patch.
>
>
> ACK
Pushed to master and 1-1-0
- --
Stephen Gallagher
RHCE 804006346421761
Delivering value year after year.
Red Hat ranks #1 in value
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 03/03/2010 07:58 AM, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
> On 03/03/2010 09:31 AM, Martin Nagy wrote:
>> Logs from confdb with missing '\n' in the DEBUG statements annoyed me so
>> I decided to fix them. I also made a quick grep through the code and
>> found other
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 03/03/2010 07:24 AM, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
> On 03/03/2010 09:29 AM, Martin Nagy wrote:
>> SSIA
>
>> Martin
>
>
Pushed to master and 1-1-0
- --
Stephen Gallagher
RHCE 804006346421761
Delivering value year after year.
Red Hat ranks #1 in value
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 03/02/2010 08:18 AM, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
> On 03/02/2010 01:40 PM, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
>> Jakub, please review
>
>
> Looks good to me, ACK.
>
>> and if you ack this, rebase your logrotate patch
>> atop it.
>
>
> Will do!
Pushed to master
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 03/02/2010 07:39 AM, Sumit Bose wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 02, 2010 at 07:24:27AM -0500, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> On 03/02/2010 07:20 AM, Sumit Bose wrote:
>
ahh, sorry,
NACK,
there is another #ifdef SYSDB_TEST where ABS_BUILD_DIR needs
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 02/26/2010 07:50 AM, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> On 02/25/2010 02:07 PM, ad...@transifex.net wrote:
>> Hello sssd, this is Transifex at http://www.transifex.net.
>
>> The following attached files were submitted to SSSD | master by ruigo
>>
>
>>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 02/26/2010 07:50 AM, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> On 02/25/2010 02:15 PM, ad...@transifex.net wrote:
>> Hello sssd, this is Transifex at http://www.transifex.net.
>
>> The following attached files were submitted to SSSD | master by raven
>>
>
>>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 03/01/2010 05:18 AM, Sumit Bose wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 26, 2010 at 12:07:29PM -0600, George McCollister wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> The latest version of sssd failed to compile for me until I applied this
>> patch.
>>
>> Regards,
>> George McCollister
>
> AC
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 03/01/2010 05:18 AM, Sumit Bose wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 26, 2010 at 12:25:38PM -0500, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> Regression test failures should be considered build breakages.
>
> ACK
Pushed to master and 1-1-0
- --
Stephen Gallagher
RHCE 8040063
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 03/04/2010 06:03 PM, Martin Nagy wrote:
> On Wed, 2010-03-03 at 14:49 +0100, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
>> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
>> Hash: SHA1
>>
>> One of our resolv tests tries to resolve a nonexistent hostname. Do not
>> run this test unles
On Wed, 2010-03-03 at 14:49 +0100, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> One of our resolv tests tries to resolve a nonexistent hostname. Do not
> run this test unless we are explicitly told that a network connection
> is available (-n).
>
> Our tests now pass
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 03/03/2010 08:44 PM, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
> Fixes: 290
Self-nack, the attached patch fixes a bug related to error handling in
the patch.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Fedora - http://enigm
I've attached a new version of the patch that uses the macros.
Regards,
George McCollister
On 03/03/2010 10:14 AM, Sumit Bose wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 01, 2010 at 09:52:12AM -0600, George McCollister wrote:
>
>> I fixed a handful of alignment problems in sss_client and nss responder.
>> Enumeratin
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 03/03/2010 09:32 PM, Simo Sorce wrote:
>
> See patch.
>
ACK
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Fedora - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
iEYEARECAAYFAkuPnNwACgkQHsardTLnvCVPqQCdGqxURfM8TJL5e1FEt
On Thu, Mar 04, 2010 at 12:38:43PM +1000, David O'Brien wrote:
> Sumit Bose wrote:
> > On Thu, Feb 25, 2010 at 08:50:43PM +0100, Sumit Bose wrote:
> >> On Thu, Feb 25, 2010 at 01:27:34PM -0500, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> >>> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> >>> Hash: SHA1
> >>>
> >>> On 02/25/2
18 matches
Mail list logo