-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Fixes https://fedorahosted.org/sssd/ticket/614
- --
Stephen Gallagher
RHCE 804006346421761
Delivering value year after year.
Red Hat ranks #1 in value among software vendors.
http://www.redhat.com/promo/vendor/
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
On Wed, Sep 08, 2010 at 09:52:31AM -0400, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 09/08/2010 09:50 AM, Sumit Bose wrote:
On Wed, Sep 08, 2010 at 09:33:04AM -0400, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
On 07/08/2010 12:57 PM, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
Just a reminder
I made a stupid error in the decryption code which caused the decryption
to fail on i686. Sumit found the bug out and the attached patch fixes it.
From d5934e29143db5d772da720b6789324dad9a05b3 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Jakub Hrozek jhro...@redhat.com
Date: Thu, 9 Sep 2010 15:06:21 +0200
Hi,
Is it really the intended behaviour of the sssd LDAP backend (I am
running the current code from the master branch) to only return the group
members that are already cached in sysdb and to silently ignore
everything else? E.g. when I start sssd with empty caches and do a
getent group
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 09/09/2010 09:14 AM, Ralf Haferkamp wrote:
Hi,
Is it really the intended behaviour of the sssd LDAP backend (I am
running the current code from the master branch) to only return the group
members that are already cached in sysdb and to
On Thu, 09 Sep 2010 09:18:12 -0400
Stephen Gallagher sgall...@redhat.com wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 09/09/2010 09:14 AM, Ralf Haferkamp wrote:
Hi,
Is it really the intended behaviour of the sssd LDAP backend (I am
running the current code from the
On Thursday 09 September 2010 15:59:46 Simo Sorce wrote:
On Thu, 09 Sep 2010 09:18:12 -0400
Stephen Gallagher sgall...@redhat.com wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 09/09/2010 09:14 AM, Ralf Haferkamp wrote:
Hi,
Is it really the intended behaviour of the
On Thu, 9 Sep 2010 16:46:35 +0200
Ralf Haferkamp rha...@suse.de wrote:
On Thursday 09 September 2010 15:59:46 Simo Sorce wrote:
On Thu, 09 Sep 2010 09:18:12 -0400
Stephen Gallagher sgall...@redhat.com wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 09/09/2010 09:14
On Thu, Sep 9, 2010 at 8:48 AM, Simo Sorce sso...@redhat.com wrote:
On Thu, 9 Sep 2010 16:46:35 +0200
Ralf Haferkamp rha...@suse.de wrote:
On Thursday 09 September 2010 15:59:46 Simo Sorce wrote:
On Thu, 09 Sep 2010 09:18:12 -0400
Stephen Gallagher sgall...@redhat.com wrote:
On Thu, 9 Sep 2010 08:57:37 -0700
Jeff Schroeder jeffschroe...@computer.org wrote:
On Thu, Sep 9, 2010 at 8:48 AM, Simo Sorce sso...@redhat.com wrote:
On Thu, 9 Sep 2010 16:46:35 +0200
Ralf Haferkamp rha...@suse.de wrote:
On Thursday 09 September 2010 15:59:46 Simo Sorce wrote:
On
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 09/08/2010 09:04 AM, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
I've also been thinking about how we're going to handle processing the
nested groups, and I think what I'm going to do is take advantage of
some of the nicer features of libcollection.
Internal
11 matches
Mail list logo