Re: [SSSD] [PATCHES] Sysdb interface for netgroups

2010-09-20 Thread Stephen Gallagher
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 09/20/2010 06:46 AM, Sumit Bose wrote: >> The patches apply fine. There is a whitespace issue, 0001 adds an empty >> line at the end of sysdb_search.c . All tests passed, please find some >> comments below. Fixed. > ret is undefined Good catch.

Re: [SSSD] Behaviour of getgrnam/getgrgid

2010-09-20 Thread Ralf Haferkamp
On Friday 17 September 2010 19:56:15 Stephen Gallagher wrote: > On 09/17/2010 12:16 PM, Ralf Haferkamp wrote: > > Find a new version attached. Does that look better? If that is not > > what you were referring to lets discuss it in IRC on monday. > > > > Note, I needed to implement sdap_process_gro

Re: [SSSD] [PATCHES] Sysdb interface for netgroups

2010-09-20 Thread Stephen Gallagher
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Thanks for the review, Sumit. I will fix these in the next iteration. I also realized that just returning the final triples won't work, as our NSS responder code needs other attributes to determine whether the cache is expired. I'm planning to split t

Re: [SSSD] [PATCHES] Sysdb interface for netgroups

2010-09-20 Thread Dmitri Pal
Jan Zelený wrote: > Stephen Gallagher wrote: > >> On 09/17/2010 07:18 PM, Jan Zeleny wrote: >> >>> I went through the code of the first patch and there are some things >>> which don't seem to be right. >>> >>> First of all, the code is missing the memory hierarchy entirely. Here are >>> so

Re: [SSSD] [PATCHES] Sysdb interface for netgroups

2010-09-20 Thread Sumit Bose
On Fri, Sep 17, 2010 at 11:21:40AM -0400, Stephen Gallagher wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > On 09/17/2010 11:16 AM, Dmitri Pal wrote: > > Stephen Gallagher wrote: > >> On 09/16/2010 05:05 PM, Stephen Gallagher wrote: > >>> I've rewritten these patches. Now, instead of

Re: [SSSD] [PATCHES] Sysdb interface for netgroups

2010-09-20 Thread Jan Zelený
Stephen Gallagher wrote: > On 09/17/2010 07:18 PM, Jan Zeleny wrote: > > I went through the code of the first patch and there are some things > > which don't seem to be right. > > > > First of all, the code is missing the memory hierarchy entirely. Here are > > some examples: > > src/db/sys_ops.c