Hi,
this patch increase the required version number of libdhash. Older
version cannot update hash entries with hash_enter(). I think we
currently do not use hash_enter() to update entries (I had a netgroup
patch where it was used, but since we let glibc do all the unrolling and
loop-detection it i
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Sumit discovered and fixed a serious bug in libdhash. Specifically, the
hash_enter() function was incapable of updating an existing entry.
We are releasing ding-libs 0.1.2 immediately with a fix for this
incorrect behavior.
ding-libs-0.1.2 is availab
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 09/29/2010 06:58 AM, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> On 09/29/2010 06:39 AM, Sumit Bose wrote:
>> Hi,
>
>> Patch 0003 add update capabilities to hash_enter(). The current
>> behaviour was to keep the old entry and return HASH_SUCCESS. I have
>> added an
On Mon, 11 Oct 2010 09:34:05 -0400
Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On 10/11/2010 09:31 AM, Simo Sorce wrote:
> > On Mon, 11 Oct 2010 08:42:58 -0400
> > Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> >
> >> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> >> Hash: SHA1
> >>
> >>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 10/12/2010 11:35 AM, Eric Doutreleau wrote:
> hi
>
> we re using sssd 1.3.0 with ldap authentication and as soon as we have
> populated a lot of groups login just after reboot is very slow ( about
> 45 seconds ).
>
> After the first initial logi
hi
we re using sssd 1.3.0 with ldap authentication and as soon as we have
populated a lot of groups login just after reboot is very slow ( about
45 seconds ).
After the first initial login all the subsequent login are immediate.
I know that there were some performance problem with initgroup. Ar
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 10/12/2010 10:18 AM, Sumit Bose wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 11, 2010 at 02:32:59PM -0400, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> Also, I'm not sure that this is safe for aligned platforms like MIPS. It
> might be wisest to just make this a 32-bit value and use the ali
On Tue, 12 Oct 2010 16:26:43 +0200
Sumit Bose wrote:
> Hi,
>
> by chance I came across these two defines which are not used
> (anymore).
ACK.
Should we also remove the tevent compat macros we have in util/util.h
at this point ?
Simo.
--
Simo Sorce * Red Hat, Inc * New York
_
Hi,
by chance I came across these two defines which are not used (anymore).
bye,
Sumit
From 1c4eb185d276d32bea80387d4053ad54be6249c1 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Sumit Bose
Date: Tue, 12 Oct 2010 10:17:46 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] Remove unused defines
---
Makefile.am |2 --
1 files changed
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 10/11/2010 01:52 PM, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
> Hi,
> these two patches add the same functionality we have in the 1.2 branch
> into master. I think they read much better b/c of the synchronous sysdb
> interface. Both must be applied on top of Ralf's patc
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 10/11/2010 05:17 PM, Ralf Haferkamp wrote:
> On Monday 11 October 2010 10:30:01 Jakub Hrozek wrote:
> [..]
>> Hi Ralf,
>>
>> I'm sorry for the delay but we have been swamped releasing the 1.2.4
>> version. We will get back to fixing the issues in th
11 matches
Mail list logo